Jump to content

The official Boris pm cluster-fuck thread


pandarilla

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Mr Heliums said:

Kind of sums up the British really: 30,000 deaths doesn't seem to register, but one specky bald twat thinking he's better than us and the entire UK is raging.

Or perhaps because there have been almost 40,000 official deaths, the British are raging at a specky twat in authority flouting the rules and risking even more deaths.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mr Heliums said:

Kind of sums up the British really: 30,000 deaths doesn't seem to register, but one specky bald twat thinking he's better than us and the entire UK is raging.

That’s a terrible analysis tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, peternapper said:

Amazed Douglas Ross finally managed to get a decision correct  he now just needs to find somewhere to stick  his flag.

 

Tbf, Douglas's parents would have been amazed to see him get in the P&J far less the front page of the Guardian. Well played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Labour seem content to just let the Tories drown themselves over this. Apparently one of their MPs was asked where their representative was this morning. They said it was Michael Gove.

Shame the pills are only going that way five months into a mammoth Tory majority.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, paul-r-cfc said:

Labour seem content to just let the Tories drown themselves over this. Apparently one of their MPs was asked where their representative was this morning. They said it was Michael Gove.

Shame the pills are only going that way five months into a mammoth Tory majority.

There’s a political strategy that says when your opponent is making a mistake never to interrupt them. 
 

If I were Labour I would allow the story to percolate naturally (which each Cabinet member is doing every time they try and explain/justify it) but when it begins to drop off the news agenda then Is the time to wade in with demands of resignations. 

If the story is still front page news this weekend it will be interesting to see if Johnson blinks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has there been any Scottish polls of late?

No, but it would be interesting to see one.
This also explains why some Scots Tories are coming out against Cummings as unlike Westminster they have an election to fight here next year and not the luxury of 4 1/2 years and an 80 seat majority like Johnson.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dunfermline Don said:


No, but it would be interesting to see one.
This also explains why some Scots Tories are coming out against Cummings as unlike Westminster they have an election to fight here next year and not the luxury of 4 1/2 years and an 80 seat majority like Johnson.

I honestly never considered that. Must be going doolally.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Dunfermline Don said:


No, but it would be interesting to see one.
This also explains why some Scots Tories are coming out against Cummings as unlike Westminster they have an election to fight here next year and not the luxury of 4 1/2 years and an 80 seat majority like Johnson.

There is also an obvious comparison with Catherine Calderwood who had some expertise in her field, drove a much shorter distance and was not infected but resigned anyway.

 It was interesting that when she was mentioned, Boris simply referred to her as "that woman" and hadn't considered any similarity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Fullerene said:

There is also an obvious comparison with Catherine Calderwood who had some expertise in her field, drove a much shorter distance and was not infected but resigned anyway.

 It was interesting that when she was mentioned, Boris simply referred to her as "that woman" and hadn't considered any similarity.

Johnson would refer to her as ‘that woman’ because he would not be able to recall her name.

That is not a flippant remark, it is a serious point.

Johnson has no head for detail, none whatsoever.  Neither does he accept or recognise this sufficiently to prepare himself for obvious questions.

This trait/failing makes him unsuitable to be PM at any time, let alone at a time of national crisis.

Maybe the reason he is defending Cummings so vigorously is because he knows how much more easily he will be exposed without that foil.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...