Jump to content

FA Cup 2019/20


Eednud

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, eez-eh said:

I don’t think it’s difficult to argue that illegally handling the ball while an opposition player is bearing down on you constitutes denying a goal scoring opportunity.

Any time I can remember seeing a foul awarded in that situation it’s been accompanied by a red card.

(it's denial of an obvious goal-scoring opportunity)

but it was on the line anyway

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Ginaro said:

(it's denial of an obvious goal-scoring opportunity)

but it was on the line anyway

 

Given he was the last player between attacker and the goal it clearly would have been a red had he been adjudged to have been outside the box.

But alas it was inside the box so it doesn’t matter anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Yep, a great deal of chuntering on about a correct decision on here.
Which no one knew if it was the correct decision or not. That's the reason it was being discussed. If BBC had shown a replay there wouldn't have been any discussion about it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Bishop Briggs said:

Win? Fyvie did not get off Wigan's bench in the 2013 FA Cup Final.

To win and to play are two different things.

Fyvie and Gary f***ing Caldwell were both on the Wigan bench in 2013. Shaun Maloney played in the game - and had the assist for the goal.

All three are FA cup winners by virtue of being in the nominated squad on the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To win and to play are two different things.
Fyvie and Gary f***ing Caldwell were both on the Wigan bench in 2013. Shaun Maloney played in the game - and had the assist for the goal.
All three are FA cup winners by virtue of being in the nominated squad on the day.
I'm contractually obliged to mention that two other Scots (well, maybe one and a half) also played in the final.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are an idiot.

Given he was the last player between attacker and the goal it clearly would have been a red had he been adjudged to have been outside the box.
But alas it was inside the box so it doesn’t matter anyway.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, printer said:

You are an idiot.

Great input m8.

A goalkeeper snatching the ball outside of the box when an attacker is bearing down on him, and there’s no one else between them and the goal is almost always a red card.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, eez-eh said:

Great input m8.

A goalkeeper snatching the ball outside of the box when an attacker is bearing down on him, and there’s no one else between them and the goal is almost always a red card.

You have completely made that up.    It’s probably a yellow, and maybe just a free kick.  Had Martinez been outside his box there is no chance he’d have been sent off.  

Its not an obvious goalscoring opportunity of the nearest opponent in 5 yards away from the ball.    Absolutely nobody is watching that ball come through and thinking ‘he’s got a great chance of scoring here’. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, parsforlife said:

You have completely made that up.    It’s probably a yellow, and maybe just a free kick.  Had Martinez been outside his box there is no chance he’d have been sent off.  

Its not an obvious goalscoring opportunity of the nearest opponent in 5 yards away from the ball.    Absolutely nobody is watching that ball come through and thinking ‘he’s got a great chance of scoring here’. 

The nearest defenders were about 10 yards away from the ball and all the wrong side of the attacker. If the keeper has to let the ball run past him rather than catching it because he’s out the box then it’s him and the attacker chasing it down with no one else between them and the goal. It really isn’t a huge stretch to say that’s a red.

No one thought he had a great chance of scoring because the keeper was able to gather the ball. If the keeper was outside his box (which we now know he wasn’t) and unable to do so then that clearly changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, eez-eh said:

The nearest defenders were about 10 yards away from the ball and all the wrong side of the attacker. If the keeper has to let the ball run past him rather than catching it because he’s out the box then it’s him and the attacker chasing it down with no one else between them and the goal. It really isn’t a huge stretch to say that’s a red.

No one thought he had a great chance of scoring because the keeper was able to gather the ball. If the keeper was outside his box (which we now know he wasn’t) and unable to do so then that clearly changes.

So even if we take your scenario, 2 players chasing a ball, one has a 5 yard head start but you think the attacker is obviously going to get there first, control the ball comfortably in an area where he’s got a reasonable angle to work with and get a decent strike away with no one being able to get back ?   How can you accurately calculate that?


I don’t think I’ve ever seen anyone get a red card for denying an obvious goal scoring opportunity when the attacker hadn’t got the ball under control.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...