Jump to content

Billy Gilmour


Kuro

Recommended Posts

12 minutes ago, Gordopolis said:


 

 


True. The only thing we can gauge is his apparent preference for known quantities and experience (he hasn't chopped and changed too much and has fallen back on guys he knows like Brophy, or when needing replacements has gone for guys like Paul McGinn and Considine - both in the later years of their careers - over youth and potential).

That makes me think the smart money is on McLean. Gilmour would be a much more exciting pick, but that's not quite Clarke's way.

 

Aye I think so, same with Hickey it will be very hard for them to force their way in in time. And there is a lot to be said for experience and team spirit and a bit of physique etc, guys like McLean are senior pros with hundreds of games under their belts, Hickey and Gilmour won't have a hundred between them by the time the Euros come round.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, nessies long lost ghost said:

Marshall, McLaughlin, Gordon

Paterson O'Donnell, McTominay, Gallacher, McKenna , Cooper, Tierney, Robertson

McLean, Jack, Armstrong, McGinn, McGregor, Gilmour, Christie, Fraser, Forrest

  Dykes McBurnie , Griffiths

I think will be the 23 that go

We're not taking a bunch of midgets

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Marshall, McLaughlin, Gordon
Paterson O'Donnell, McTominay, Gallacher, McKenna , Cooper, Tierney, Robertson
McLean, Jack, Armstrong, McGinn, McGregor, Gilmour, Christie, Fraser, Forrest
  Dykes McBurnie , Griffiths
I think will be the 23 that go


At first glance, I can't see any obvious omissions there, so you could well be right.
Second glance I see Shankland is gone, but that's fair enough - 3 proper strikers plus Forrest, Fraser and Christie as potential second strikers (or attacking midfield/wing) is plenty.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Gordopolis said:


 

 


At first glance, I can't see any obvious omissions there, so you could well be right.
Second glance I see Shankland is gone, but that's fair enough - 3 proper strikers plus Forrest, Fraser and Christie as potential second strikers (or attacking midfield/wing) is plenty.

 

I rate Shankland very highly - I'm a Dundee fan

He scored a brilliant goal last week against some c**t

But I think he will just miss out

Shankland, Burke, Fleck and Turnbull will just miss out I reckon

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, nessies long lost ghost said:

I think Paterson will go as he can cover quite a few positions. He won't start.

None of them all that well though. I think Palmer will be taken and then if needed someone like Forrest or Fraser could cover the right wing back position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Rodhull said:

None of them all that well though. I think Palmer will be taken and then if needed someone like Forrest or Fraser could cover the right wing back position.

I forgot about Palmer to be fair

You may be right, I'd personally go for Paterson over Palmer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jimi Shandrix said:

If we are really having a serious discussion as to whether Gilmour is a better player than either Fleck or McLean then we are fucked before we get started. 

Gilmour is a better player than Mclean

I think both will go though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nessies long lost ghost said:

Marshall, McLaughlin, Gordon

Paterson O'Donnell, McTominay, Gallacher, McKenna , Cooper, Tierney, Robertson

McLean, Jack, Armstrong, McGinn, McGregor, Gilmour, Christie, Fraser, Forrest

  Dykes McBurnie , Griffiths

I think will be the 23 that go

You're selecting McBurnie because idiotic managers have signed him.   Sheff Utd would have an increased points tally if Shankland was in their ranks.   

Almost certainly this post will trigger someone saying "If Shankland was better than McBurnie he wouldn't still be at Dundee Utd"  

It's classic P and Bovril and forum with loads of smart folk and many fools.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Erih Shtrep said:

You're selecting McBurnie because idiotic managers have signed him.   Sheff Utd would have an increased points tally if Shankland was in their ranks.   

Almost certainly this post will trigger someone saying "If Shankland was better than McBurnie he wouldn't still be at Dundee Utd"  

It's classic P and Bovril and forum with loads of smart folk and many fools.  

I think Nisbett is looking the best of the others just now and in with a decent chance.  I know that contradicts what I said about players who didn't help us get there going but sue me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Erih Shtrep said:

You're selecting McBurnie because idiotic managers have signed him.   Sheff Utd would have an increased points tally if Shankland was in their ranks.   

Almost certainly this post will trigger someone saying "If Shankland was better than McBurnie he wouldn't still be at Dundee Utd"  

It's classic P and Bovril and forum with loads of smart folk and many fools.  

What the f**k are you talking about?

I specifically said I believe this is the 23 who will go

I never said I would choose McBurnie over Shankland

Get your facts right before making a total c**t of yourself.

Edited by nessies long lost ghost
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, nessies long lost ghost said:

Marshall, McLaughlin, Gordon

Paterson O'Donnell, McTominay, Gallacher, McKenna , Cooper, Tierney, Robertson

McLean, Jack, Armstrong, McGinn, McGregor, Gilmour, Christie, Fraser, Forrest

  Dykes McBurnie , Griffiths

I think will be the 23 that go

be1qSK.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, nessies long lost ghost said:

Marshall, McLaughlin, Gordon

Paterson O'Donnell, McTominay, Gallacher, McKenna , Cooper, Tierney, Robertson

McLean, Jack, Armstrong, McGinn, McGregor, Gilmour, Christie, Fraser, Forrest

  Dykes McBurnie , Griffiths

I think will be the 23 that go

speak up......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...