AlanCamelonfan Posted October 1, 2019 Share Posted October 1, 2019 6 minutes ago, GordonS said: How much less though? £100 a week? £20? A fiver? Just trying to get an idea of the scale here. If twenty players are on a fiver week less. That's saving 100 a week. 400 s year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanCamelonfan Posted October 1, 2019 Share Posted October 1, 2019 6 minutes ago, lithgierose said: Has he got connections to folk at the rose. And or friends not directly connected now? I have no idea? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lithgierose Posted October 1, 2019 Share Posted October 1, 2019 4 minutes ago, AlanCamelonfan said: I have no idea? Mine neither. But I know someone who does. We can all speculate. But at the end of the day it will be the committee who decides who the manager will be. End off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheep77 Posted October 1, 2019 Share Posted October 1, 2019 Senior manager been approached the committee waiting on his answer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FuzzyBear Posted October 1, 2019 Share Posted October 1, 2019 Senior manager been approached the committee waiting on his answer Brown Ferguson ? -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinderbrokeyourhearts Posted October 1, 2019 Share Posted October 1, 2019 Well not really. I'm not about to fire out figures which are confidential in an AGM on here but it doesn't take a genius for anyone at any club to do a simple divide by 40 weeks and 20 players to work out an average - fair enough with assumptions on that. So basically what this has confirmed is no one has an idea about who pays what [emoji1] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auld Heid Posted October 1, 2019 Author Share Posted October 1, 2019 Senior manager been approached the committee waiting on his answer With our recent track record it will probably be Derek McInnes -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lithgierose Posted October 1, 2019 Share Posted October 1, 2019 24 minutes ago, Sheep77 said: Senior manager been approached the committee waiting on his answer John coughlin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lithgierose Posted October 1, 2019 Share Posted October 1, 2019 1 minute ago, Auld Heid said: 25 minutes ago, Sheep77 said: Senior manager been approached the committee waiting on his answer With our recent track record it will probably be Derek McInnes Oofftt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Legless Posted October 1, 2019 Share Posted October 1, 2019 With our recent track record it will probably be Derek McInnes It’s that the same guy who pumped you out of both cups last season? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lithgierose Posted October 1, 2019 Share Posted October 1, 2019 Op takes time to greenie a post. But won't answer questions. I smell buses. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 1, 2019 Share Posted October 1, 2019 To be honest, the running budget is no one else's business barring the clubs management and committee. I dont like this sharing of information society we live in. The rose will have supplied the manager a budget they think is good enough to make them competitive enough to access the LL and at least, draw dependant, the first two rounds of the Senior Scottish. What everyone has to understand is that not every player will be paid the same. Strikers generally cost more than defenders. Some players will be paid wages, some expenses. Every player negotiates their own deal and it isn't as simple as dividing a random number by 20 players. What you also have to factor in is the Linlithgow tax players may apply to their negotiations. For example, if a player wanted to get £xx a week for football, if Linlithgow came calling most will be asking for that plus an extra £25 just because it was Linlithgow. If twenty players are on a fiver week less. That's saving 100 a week. 400 s year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanCamelonfan Posted October 1, 2019 Share Posted October 1, 2019 57 minutes ago, G4Mac said: To be honest, the running budget is no one else's business barring the clubs management and committee. I dont like this sharing of information society we live in. The rose will have supplied the manager a budget they think is good enough to make them competitive enough to access the LL and at least, draw dependant, the first two rounds of the Senior Scottish. What everyone has to understand is that not every player will be paid the same. Strikers generally cost more than defenders. Some players will be paid wages, some expenses. Every player negotiates their own deal and it isn't as simple as dividing a random number by 20 players. What you also have to factor in is the Linlithgow tax players may apply to their negotiations. For example, if a player wanted to get £xx a week for football, if Linlithgow came calling most will be asking for that plus an extra £25 just because it was Linlithgow. Dividing it by 20 gives you an average yes some would be above and some below. They are given a budget but it you are bringing in ex seniors like they are. They wont come cheap. Who ever comes in though will have the same players I'm not sure what their committee think is going to be a whole lot different with a different manager Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grinderbrokeyourhearts Posted October 1, 2019 Share Posted October 1, 2019 Aye fair point. My original post wasn't intended to get into details anyway, I was just giving my opinion that I expect us to be doing better and that's maybe why MB was let go.Anyhow. Looking forwars to hearing who the new man is and getting behind him and the lads. Htg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sponsorsladdie Posted October 1, 2019 Share Posted October 1, 2019 Dividing it by 20 gives you an average yes some would be above and some below. They are given a budget but it you are bringing in ex seniors like they are. They wont come cheap. Who ever comes in though will have the same players I'm not sure what their committee think is going to be a whole lot different with a different managerSome seasoned juniors are on more that some seniors. Not sure why everyone is obsessed about money and who pays what.All walks of life companies run to a budget and people agree to contracts they are happy with. As long as the income covers the costs then there isn’t an issue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheep77 Posted October 1, 2019 Share Posted October 1, 2019 Agreed it matter who gets paid as long as they live within there means Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlanCamelonfan Posted October 1, 2019 Share Posted October 1, 2019 19 minutes ago, sponsorsladdie said: Some seasoned juniors are on more that some seniors. Not sure why everyone is obsessed about money and who pays what. All walks of life companies run to a budget and people agree to contracts they are happy with. As long as the income covers the costs then there isn’t an issue True but surely as a supporter you want your investment to pay off. The committee obviously not happy with the way they are playing or they wouldnt make the change they've made Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 1, 2019 Share Posted October 1, 2019 Dividing it by 20 gives you an average yes some would be above and some below. They are given a budget but it you are bringing in ex seniors like they are. They wont come cheap. Who ever comes in though will have the same players I'm not sure what their committee think is going to be a whole lot different with a different managerI know what you are saying Alan, however as pointed out certain non league players earn far in excess of what a player in L2 earns on a weekly basis. It's all relevant really. If Linlithgow can cover what they spend, who cares what it is they spend?On your point of a new manager, again that's a committee decision. If they feel a change is warranted they will make it. Rightly or wrongly. It happens at every club in the country, non league, professional, amateur and Premier league. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Braveheart72 Posted October 1, 2019 Share Posted October 1, 2019 1 hour ago, AlanCamelonfan said: True but surely as a supporter you want your investment to pay off. The committee obviously not happy with the way they are playing or they wouldnt make the change they've made To be fair , the committee were trying to interfere with the running of the team as well as training schedules etc. Also despite there supposedly being a big budget for players the management had hhehaw provided to them... Q when was the last time they paid a transfer fee for a player... Also at next AGM ask how much the Small rain shelter cost ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Auld Heid Posted October 1, 2019 Author Share Posted October 1, 2019 To be fair , the committee were trying to interfere with the running of the team as well as training schedules etc. Also despite there supposedly being a big budget for players the management had hhehaw provided to them... Q when was the last time they paid a transfer fee for a player... Also at next AGM ask how much the Small rain shelter cost ?Very few teams pay transfer fees at this level - it's mainly out of contract. The disabled viewing shelter was provided between capital and grants as part of our licence requirements. Such a provision doesn't impact playing resources. Can't answer about alleged interference on training schedules. But clearly you have given some suggestion - personally I think your information is wrong - both Bradley and Ronald wouldn't have allowed it. As for nothing provided - maybe the training and matchday kits were only for the photos...!!! Would be interested to hear what wasn't provided according to your information. -1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts