Jump to content

Kazakhstan V Scotland


Enigma

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Everytime the Kazakhs go forward we look like we're going to conceed. No idea what this Scotland side is meant to be doing other than being absolutely honking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 minute ago, ali_91 said:

Absolute nonsense. We have vastly superior players and should be beating this dross. They’ve drawn with Andorra and Latvia in their Nations League group. 

It’s an embarrassment to drop any points here, never mind being down 2-0 in 10 minutes. 

We absolutely should be beating them on paper.  But if you hadn't seen either side and had to pick which one was technically superior and which had the better players, who would they pick?  Not us.

As with so many other "diddies", we for the most part either write them off or give them the "wha's like us" treatment, that we'll be beaten by a shite side.  Maybe if we started realising that they're catching up with us, we'll actually start playing like we're better for a change.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole week, at the start of a qualifying campaign, the tone has been set by players calling off.

Bad enough if understandable for friendlies but look where it has led to...

It would be nose off to spute face to tell these guys not to come back, but McLeish had better lay down the fucking law after this.




Dont see why he would when you consider two of the players missing are our best players
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, lanky_ffc said:

If anyone is looking for a glimmer of hope, we've got their LB on toast. That's the only root back into the game I can see at the moment. 

But benefiting from that would involve Burke doing something with the ball once he's past him.

If this was red rover we'd be fucking there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, forameus said:

 

We absolutely should be beating them on paper.  But if you hadn't seen either side and had to pick which one was technically superior and which had the better players, who would they pick?  Not us.

As with so many other "diddies", we for the most part either write them off or give them the "wha's like us" treatment, that we'll be beaten by a shite side.  Maybe if we started realising that they're catching up with us, we'll actually start playing like we're better for a change.

As it stands this has nothing to do with technical ability and everything to do with very basic shape and Organisation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, forameus said:

But benefiting from that would involve Burke doing something with the ball once he's past him.

If this was red rover we'd be fucking there.

Aye, his final ball has been terrible. Doesn't help that our runners have been taking up poor positions too. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, lanky_ffc said:

If anyone is looking for a glimmer of hope, we've got their LB on toast. That's the only root back into the game I can see at the moment. 

If we have their on toast, then they have ours on a spit-roast. I feel sorry for him though, not his position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But benefiting from that would involve Burke doing something with the ball once he's past him.
If this was red rover we'd be fucking there.

Burke's playing on the right mate!!!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, forameus said:

 

We absolutely should be beating them on paper.  But if you hadn't seen either side and had to pick which one was technically superior and which had the better players, who would they pick?  Not us.

As with so many other "diddies", we for the most part either write them off or give them the "wha's like us" treatment, that we'll be beaten by a shite side.  Maybe if we started realising that they're catching up with us, we'll actually start playing like we're better for a change.

Kazakhstan are one of the worst teams in the continent. They're not catching up with us, we're falling back to them. We've been on the slide for over 30 years and show no signs or arresting the fall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...