stvr794 Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 Were you watching the same game?!I watched the game and it was a definite penalty. Just because it wasn’t a leg breaking challenge doesn’t mean it wasn’t a penalty. Lundie jumped into Samson committing a foul therefore it was a penalty. If it was anywhere else on the pitch outside the box it would also have been a free kick! Talbot were there for the taking yesterday so Cumnock fans have only their manager to blame for the defeat for his game plan which was to slow the game down at every opportunity and hound the ref constantly. If you actually had a go at Talbot who knows what would have happened so don’t blame the ref for defeat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bul2 Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 People on here talk about Nocknosh being a bit stupid , however, I think that this poster is giving him/ her a run for their moneyFirstly, the penalty looked as if it was outside the box and I didn’t think it was a penaltyHowever, being at the other end of the pitch I wasn’t in best place to give an opinion However, the “challenge” by Wilson on Montgomerie was a straight red card every day of the week From where I was standing you seen him deliberately elbow the man in the face , which was confirmed to me by two other people who were taking in the game as their teams game was offAs far as Cumnock not making a game of it , it takes two teams to make a game, if Cumnock were so bad, why were Talbot not running over Cumnock .Spoke to my auld mate George Caldwell , who I think knows a bit about fitba and him, and his two mates , said it was the worst game they had seen for many a long dayRef was a joke Semple booked for talking back - correct Montgomerie booked for talking backShankland running over to the wee linesman and giving him pelters , straight after Montgomerie got his card for disputing a decision - nothing That was the issue - lack of consistency There were at least 4-5 times the linesmen were giving a throw in one way , to Cumnock, and he overruled them to give it the other wayWithout the penalty , we would still have been playing as neither looked like they would score Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackie Gold Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 On the other hand they might have got a right royal pumping yesterday if they had went for it. I thought Burns tactics were spot on when a lower club comes up against a much more talented squad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Blackie Gold Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 5 minutes ago, Bul2 said: People on here talk about Nocknosh being a bit stupid , however, I think that this poster is giving him/ her a run for their money Firstly, the penalty looked as if it was outside the box and I didn’t think it was a penalty However, being at the other end of the pitch I wasn’t in best place to give an opinion However, the “challenge” by Wilson on Montgomerie was a straight red card every day of the week From where I was standing you seen him deliberately elbow the man in the face , which was confirmed to me by two other people who were taking in the game as their teams game was off As far as Cumnock not making a game of it , it takes two teams to make a game, if Cumnock were so bad, why were Talbot not running over Cumnock . Spoke to my auld mate George Caldwell , who I think knows a bit about fitba and him, and his two mates , said it was the worst game they had seen for many a long day Ref was a joke Semple booked for talking back - correct Montgomerie booked for talking back Shankland running over to the wee linesman and giving him pelters , straight after Montgomerie got his card for disputing a decision - nothing That was the issue - lack of consistency There were at least 4-5 times the linesmen were giving a throw in one way , to Cumnock, and he overruled them to give it the other way Without the penalty , we would still have been playing as neither looked like they would score I was straight in line with it and actually shouted for a free kick as I thought it was marginally outside the box, but it was still a foul. I also think the referee had a torrid time of it due to Burns and his cohorts continually surrounding him for every decision. I agree with Mr Caldwell it was a howler of a match but as I already said in this thread that on that plazzy pitch I would have taken a 1-0 win and the three points. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stvr794 Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 People on here talk about Nocknosh being a bit stupid , however, I think that this poster is giving him/ her a run for their moneyFirstly, the penalty looked as if it was outside the box and I didn’t think it was a penaltyHowever, being at the other end of the pitch I wasn’t in best place to give an opinion However, the “challenge” by Wilson on Montgomerie was a straight red card every day of the week From where I was standing you seen him deliberately elbow the man in the face , which was confirmed to me by two other people who were taking in the game as their teams game was offAs far as Cumnock not making a game of it , it takes two teams to make a game, if Cumnock were so bad, why were Talbot not running over Cumnock .Spoke to my auld mate George Caldwell , who I think knows a bit about fitba and him, and his two mates , said it was the worst game they had seen for many a long dayRef was a joke Semple booked for talking back - correct Montgomerie booked for talking backShankland running over to the wee linesman and giving him pelters , straight after Montgomerie got his card for disputing a decision - nothing That was the issue - lack of consistency There were at least 4-5 times the linesmen were giving a throw in one way , to Cumnock, and he overruled them to give it the other wayWithout the penalty , we would still have been playing as neither looked like they would scoreThat’s as poor as Talbot have played all season hence the reason I said they were there for the taking but Cumnock were more interested in killing the game at every opportunityFrom where I was it looked just inside the box either way it was a foul on Samson and the ref gave a penalty. Didn’t have a good view of the incident with Wilson and monty so cant comment but monty was booked in the 1st half then near the end committed 3 fouls and wasn’t given a 2nd yellow but you won’t mention that or the fair challenge from Hyslop that got him bookedIt amazes me that a grown man has to resort to name calling when somebody voices their opinion on a game that doesn’t agree with your own. Shows your mentality Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
geo 1909 Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 The cumnock committee were shouting after the game that they had video evidence that it wasnt a penalty, obviously a lot of pish or it would of been plastered all over social media by now, i was also right down that end of the park and thought the ref called it right i also think he had a nightmare and was card happy Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
murphy1970 Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 Brutal game but all that matters is the 3 points. Like other Bot fans have said, it was arguably our worst performance of the season but we still managed the win. We're now sitting in a very strong position within touching distance of Hurlford with plenty of games in hand. As for Cumnock they'll probably just avoid relegation but that's no certainty. They've 3 games left to play and will possibly need 4 points to make sure; no easy task when you carry no goal threat Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talbot supporter Posted March 10, 2019 Author Share Posted March 10, 2019 When last did Cumnock beat Talbot in the league, must be about 10 years? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy25 Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 2009. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talbot 1978 Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 2009.Glenafton should be our main rivals nowadays. In comparison to the old firm Cumnock would be considered Patrick Thistle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenmuir Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 8 minutes ago, Talbot 1978 said: Glenafton should be our main rivals nowadays. In comparison to the old firm Cumnock would be considered Patrick Thistle 8 minutes ago, Talbot 1978 said: Glenafton should be our main rivals nowadays. In comparison to the old firm Cumnock would be considered Patrick Thistle Last team to beat Talbot in the league Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talbot 1978 Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 Last team to beat Talbot in the leagueIt also proves that you don't need to be in the central belt area to be a big team. Two far away East Ayrshire teams beating the best, yet the club in the middle who arguably have the biggest access to funds and fans are struggling. Is it their mind set or lack of community? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spit Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 Watched the game yesterday as a neutral, wasn't much of a game, Talbot were far superior in all areas, penalty award was very soft happened right in front of me, Cumnock looked very average, Paul burns can't possibly be in charge next season, he's not even doing it as a player never mind as a manager, in fact Cumnock offered nothing really, didn't seem to have a striker being truthful they didn't need one yesterday, as he'd have got no service, ref must have booked 11-12 players and a would say 9-10 of the bookings were for decent by mouth, heard so much about these derby's, blood thunder, all in all it was a timmed affair Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nock10 Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 Watched the game yesterday as a neutral, wasn't much of a game, Talbot were far superior in all areas, penalty award was very soft happened right in front of me, Cumnock looked very average, Paul burns can't possibly be in charge next season, he's not even doing it as a player never mind as a manager, in fact Cumnock offered nothing really, didn't seem to have a striker being truthful they didn't need one yesterday, as he'd have got no service, ref must have booked 11-12 players and a would say 9-10 of the bookings were for decent by mouth, heard so much about these derby's, blood thunder, all in all it was a timmed affair Burns will 100% be in charge next year. Down to the bare bones yesterday with a few players missing through injury and suspension. Set the team up as best we could not to concede and unlucky not to achieve that. Irrespective of the result yesterday and where we finish there is a positive vibe around the place regards future plans and management team are absolutely part of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wile E Coyote Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 14 minutes ago, Nock10 said: Burns will 100% be in charge next year. Good. He has managed to turn a solid mid-table team into absolute dog shite. Looking forward to see what he does with a full season Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spit Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 Burns will 100% be in charge next year. Down to the bare bones yesterday with a few players missing through injury and suspension. Set the team up as best we could not to concede and unlucky not to achieve that. Irrespective of the result yesterday and where we finish there is a positive vibe around the place regards future plans and management team are absolutely part of that.Well a can only offer use good luck, a really hope Cumnock have a big budget as recruitment is most definitely needed, wee number 6 was miles off the pace, burns wasnt the player he used to be either and if he's serious about managing then he needs a player for his position, he can't manage from the centre of the pitch but overall the team looked as though they lacked all over , my own personal opinion burns appointment as manager could be a costly mistake for Cumnocks long term future, big wages on average players was the general impression a got from the Cumnock supporters I spoke to yesterday, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nock10 Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 Well a can only offer use good luck, a really hope Cumnock have a big budget as recruitment is most definitely needed, wee number 6 was miles off the pace, burns wasnt the player he used to be either and if he's serious about managing then he needs a player for his position, he can't manage from the centre of the pitch but overall the team looked as though they lacked all over , my own personal opinion burns appointment as manager could be a costly mistake for Cumnocks long term future, big wages on average players was the general impression a got from the Cumnock supporters I spoke to yesterday, We live in hope, players will come and go, budget will be a big factor like majority of clubs. In terms of Burns not being the player he used to be....IMO; man of the match performance against the champions last week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nocknosh1988 Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 3 hours ago, Talbot 1978 said: Glenafton should be our main rivals nowadays. In comparison to the old firm Cumnock would be considered Patrick Thistle The Cumnock v tablet derby is much biggger than Tablet glens . Glens had a one season wonder and have been woeful since . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Talbot 1978 Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 The Cumnock v tablet derby is much biggger than Tablet glens . Glens had a one season wonder and have been woeful since . I think they have been more successful in the last 25 years. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cumnockian Posted March 10, 2019 Share Posted March 10, 2019 Watched the game yesterday as a neutral, wasn't much of a game, Talbot were far superior in all areas, penalty award was very soft happened right in front of me, Cumnock looked very average, Paul burns can't possibly be in charge next season, he's not even doing it as a player never mind as a manager, in fact Cumnock offered nothing really, didn't seem to have a striker being truthful they didn't need one yesterday, as he'd have got no service, ref must have booked 11-12 players and a would say 9-10 of the bookings were for decent by mouth, heard so much about these derby's, blood thunder, all in all it was a timmed affair Is this based on watching one game v the best team currently in junior football, that Burns is not good enough to manage Cumnock? Surely every manager deserves a chance to bring in his own players and then see what happens?Either that or you are not quite a neutral... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.