Jump to content

Semi-Final Draw


Recommended Posts

Guest Bob Mahelp
10 hours ago, HibeeJibee said:

 


Tbh, it's becoming a bit of an old chestnut nowadays - OF have actually drawn each other in Semi-Finals as often in recent times than they've been drawn apart.

Where it originates from was a fairly incredible run from about 1960 to 1990 where they only drew each other 3 times out of almost 50 appearances in Semi-Finals. If you believe the conspiracy theory this came to a halt at about the time draws began to be televised live from late 1980s/early 1990s.


This is the list of occasions they've both appeared in the Semi-Finals of first-team tournaments and the outcome:

1889-90   GLA      APART
1891-92   SCO      TOGETHER
1891-92   GLC      APART
1892-93   GLC      APART
1892-93   GLA      APART
1893-94   SCO      APART
1893-94   GLA      TOGETHER
1893-94   GLC      APART
1894-95   GLA      APART
1894-95   GLC      APART
1895-96   GLC      TOGETHER
1896-97   GLA      APART
1896-97   GLC      TOGETHER
1897-98   GLA      TOGETHER
1897-98   GLC      TOGETHER
1898-99   SCO      APART
1898-99   GLA      TOGETHER
1898-99   GLC      APART
1899-00   SCO      TOGETHER
1899-00   GLA       APART
1899-00   GLC       APART
1900-01   GLC      TOGETHER
1901-02   SCO      APART
1901-02   GLA       APART
1903-04   SCO      APART
1903-04   GLC      APART
1904-05   SCO      TOGETHER
1904-05   GLA      APART
1905-06   GLA      APART
1905-06   GLC      TOGETHER
1906-07   GLC      APART
1907-08   GLA      APART
1907-08   GLC      APART
1908-09   SCO      APART
1908-09   GLA      TOGETHER
1908-09   GLC      APART
1909-10   GLA      APART
1910-11   GLA      APART
1910-11   GLC      APART
1911-12   GLC      APART
1912-13   GLA      APART
1912-13   GLC      APART
1913-14   GLA      APART
1913-14   GLC      APART
1914-15   GLC      APART
1915-16   GLA      APART
1915-16   GLC      TOGETHER
1916-17   GLA      TOGETHER
1916-17   GLC      TOGETHER
1917-18   WAR    APART
1917-18   GLA      TOGETHER

1918-19   GLA      APART
1918-19   GLC      APART
1919-20   GLC      TOGETHER
1920-21   GLA      TOGETHER
1920-21   GLC      APART
1921-22   GLA      APART
1921-22   GLC      TOGETHER
1922-23   GLC      TOGETHER
1923-24   GLA      TOGETHER
1923-24   GLC      APART
1924-25   SCO      TOGETHER
1924-25   GLA      APART
1925-26   SCO      APART
1925-26   GLA      TOGETHER
1926-27   GLA      APART
1926-27   GLC      TOGETHER
1927-28   SCO      APART
1927-28   GLA      APART
1927-28   GLC      TOGETHER
1928-29   SCO      APART
1928-29   GLC      APART
1929-30   GLA      APART
1929-30   GLC      APART
1930-31   GLA      APART
1931-32   GLA      TOGETHER
1931-32   GLC      APART
1932-33   GLA      APART
1932-33   GLC      APART
1933-34   GLA      TOGETHER
1933-34   GLC      APART
1934-35   GLA      TOGETHER
1934-35   GLC      APART
1935-36   GLA      APART
1935-36   GLC      APART
1936-37   GLA      TOGETHER
1937-38   GLA      TOGETHER
1937-38   GLC      APART
1939-40   GLA      APART
1939-40   GLC      TOGETHER
1940-41   SLG       APART
1940-41   GLA      APART
1940-41   GLC      APART
1941-42   SLG       TOGETHER
1941-42   GLA      TOGETHER
1941-42   GLC      TOGETHER
1943-44   SLG       TOGETHER
1943-44   GLC      APART
1944-45   GLA      APART
1944-45   GLC      APART

1945-46   VIC       TOGETHER
1945-46   GLC      TOGETHER
1946-47   GLC      APART
1947-48   SCO      APART
1947-48   GLA      APART
1947-48   GLC      APART
1948-49   GLA      APART
1948-49   GLC      APART
1949-50   GLA      TOGETHER
1949-50   GLC      APART
1950-51   GLA      APART
1951-52   LGE      TOGETHER
1952-53   GLC      APART
1953-54   SCO      APART
1953-54   GLA      TOGETHER
1954-55   GLA      APART
1954-55   GLC      TOGETHER
1955-56   GLA      APART
1957-58   LGE       APART
1957-58   GLC      TOGETHER
1958-59   GLC      TOGETHER
1959-60   SCO      TOGETHER
1959-60   GLC      TOGETHER
1961-62   SCO      APART
1961-62   GLA      APART
1962-63   SCO      APART
1963-64   GLA      APART
1964-65   LGE       APART
1965-66   LGE       APART
1965-66   SCO      APART
1966-67   LGE       APART
1968-69   SCO      APART
1968-69   GLA      TOGETHER
1969-70   GLA      APART
1970-71   LGE       APART
1970-71   SCO      APART
1970-71   GLA      APART
1971-72   SCO      APART
1972-73   DRY      APART
1972-73   LGE       APART
1972-73   SCO      APART
1973-74   DRY      APART
1973-74   LGE       TOGETHER
1974-75   DRY      APART
1974-75   GLA      APART
1975-76   LGE       APART
1975-76   GLA      APART
1976-77   LGE       APART
1976-77   SCO      APART
1977-78   LGE       APART
1978-79   LGE       TOGETHER
1978-79   GLA       APART
1979-80   DRY      APART
1979-80   SCO      APART
1979-80   GLA      APART
1980-81   SCO      APART
1980-81   GLA      APART
1981-82   GLA      APART
1982-83   LGE       APART
1982-83   SCO      APART
1982-83   GLA      APART
1983-84   LGE       APART
1984-85   GLA      APART
1985-86   GLA      APART
1986-87   LGE       APART
1986-87   GLA      APART
1987-88   GLA      APART
1988-89   SCO      APART
1989-90   LGE       APART
1990-91   LGE       APART
1991-92   SCO      TOGETHER
1992-93   LGE       APART
1993-94   LGE       TOGETHER
1995-96   SCO      TOGETHER
1997-98   SCO      TOGETHER
1998-99   SCO      APART
2000-01   LGE       TOGETHER
2001-02   LGE       TOGETHER
2001-02   SCO      APART
2002-03   LGE       APART
2008-09   LGE       APART
2010-11   LGE       APART
2014-15   LGE       TOGETHER
2015-16   SCO      TOGETHER
2016-17   LGE       TOGETHER
2016-17   SCO      TOGETHER
2017-18   LGE       APART
2017-18   SCO      TOGETHER
2018-19   LGE       APART
2018-19   SCO      TOGETHER

The OF were in 49 semi-finals from 61/62 to 91/92 and they were drawn together 4 times.  And then only once in the Scottish cup.

That's where the rumours of a constant fix come from.

Funnily enough, once the draws started to be televised then the number of times they've met in semi-finals has been far more balanced.

 

Edit : Ooooooooooooooops. I should have read the first 2 paragraphs before posting. Sorry.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply
12 hours ago, Monkey Tennis said:

It's actually remarkable the extent to which they don't get kept apart these days.

It would be good to plot the draws that put them together with when draws were actually televised. From the mid 1950s crowds began to wane and chairmen outwith the OF were no doubt pleased with the money that a cup draw against the OF would bring. From the mid 50s through the 60s and 70s to the mid 80s,  despite them both being in almost every Scottish and League cup draw, 1st round, 2nd round, quarters  and even semis (where it was 1 in 3 chance), I think they were only ever drawn together a handful of times. Then came regular televising of cup draws and, by coincidence, they started getting drawn together sometimes. Could their mutual avoidance just have been a very long statistical blip ? Call me a cynic...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could just as easily argue that being drawn together in 6 of the last 8 semi-final draws is incredibly unlikely given that they should only have a 1 in 3 chance. People always look for patterns in randomness.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, craigkillie said:

You could just as easily argue that being drawn together in 6 of the last 8 semi-final draws is incredibly unlikely given that they should only have a 1 in 3 chance. People always look for patterns in randomness.

Yes, but where there is motive and strange runs of draws, cynics are bound to ask the question. For balance. I would have to say that Rangers run of home draws in the cups was handy for a team desperate to get to Hampden and be relevant in a period when  Celtic  were on a different planet and Hearts run of "money-spinner" home cup draws against Celtic and Hibs just when we desperately needed to money to climb back out of Admin woes, was fortuitous. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, craigkillie said:

You could just as easily argue that being drawn together in 6 of the last 8 semi-final draws is incredibly unlikely given that they should only have a 1 in 3 chance. People always look for patterns in randomness.

It's a bit more than double what you'd expect. Of course, you could argue that now the incentive is actually to draw them together for TV money ! But 6 instead of 2 or 3, over a short period of time is not in the same incredulity league as only being drawn together 4 times out of 49 semis over 3 decades !! Is it ? And that's before you even take in to consideration the quarters and all the early rounds too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Pet Jeden said:

Yes, but where there is motive and strange runs of draws, cynics are bound to ask the question. For balance. I would have to say that Rangers run of home draws in the cups was handy for a team desperate to get to Hampden and be relevant in a period when  Celtic  were on a different planet and Hearts run of "money-spinner" home cup draws against Celtic and Hibs just when we desperately needed to money to climb back out of Admin woes, was fortuitous. 

What you are suggesting here is that a series of celebrities and former footballers have been willing to put their reputation on the line in order to fix a cup draw. It's not like it's some wee guy from the SFA picking them out in secret.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, craigkillie said:

You could just as easily argue that being drawn together in 6 of the last 8 semi-final draws is incredibly unlikely given that they should only have a 1 in 3 chance. People always look for patterns in randomness.

The odds against them meeting more than 5 times out of 8 are about 50/1

The odds against then not meeting at all in 8 draws  are about 25/1

Both are unlikely  but not incredibly  so

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We all make jokes about it, which is fine - but anyone who genuinely believes that any cup draw in the last 30 years or so has been rigged in favour of keeping the "Old Firm" apart needs their head examined. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, craigkillie said:

What you are suggesting here is that a series of celebrities and former footballers have been willing to put their reputation on the line in order to fix a cup draw. It's not like it's some wee guy from the SFA picking them out in secret.

No. I'm kind of arguing against myself. I'm saying the old non-televised draws keeping the OF apart are hard to believe. But, on the other hand, longish  sequences of open, televised draws can also throw up weird, lucky runs - which Hearts and Rangers have both benefited from in recent years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, topcat(The most tip top) said:

The odds against them meeting more than 5 times out of 8 are about 50/1

The odds against then not meeting at all in 8 draws  are about 25/1

Both are unlikely  but not incredibly  so

topcat - if you have the maths nous for it (I certainly don't)  - what would have been the  odds on the OF only being drawn together at any stage of the SC or LC 3 times between 1955 and 1990 ? ( or, on average, how many times would they be expected to meet ?)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, craigkillie said:

What you are suggesting here is that a series of celebrities and former footballers have been willing to put their reputation on the line in order to fix a cup draw. It's not like it's some wee guy from the SFA picking them out in secret.

Tell you what - if I was fixing a draw I wouldn't be inviting an off-his-face Rod Stewart to help !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Pet Jeden said:

topcat - if you have the maths nous for it (I certainly don't)  - what would have been the  odds on the OF only being drawn together at any stage of the SC or LC 3 times between 1955 and 1990 ? ( or, on average, how many times would they be expected to meet ?)

If you can track down the data on how many rounds they were both in I'll crunch the data for you

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Pet Jeden said:

topcat - if you have the maths nous for it (I certainly don't)  - what would have been the  odds on the OF only being drawn together at any stage of the SC or LC 3 times between 1955 and 1990 ? ( or, on average, how many times would they be expected to meet ?)

I'm almost certainly wrong, but isn't it 1 in 3 for both, those being the odds of being drawn together in the semi-final draw?

At each round, the odds are 1 in (n-1), where n is the total number of teams in the hat. But if each round passes without them being drawn together, you end up at the shortest possible odds - 1 in 3. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, The Master said:

I'm almost certainly wrong, but isn't it 1 in 3 for both, those being the odds of being drawn together in the semi-final draw?

At each round, the odds are 1 in (n-1), where n is the total number of teams in the hat. But if each round passes without them being drawn together, you end up at the shortest possible odds - 1 in 3. 

Assuming neither side lose to anyone else it's slightly less than a 50% chance of  meeting before the final

We could do some difficult maths but instead it should be intuitively clear if you imagine doing the whole draw in advance like at Wimbledon In a 32 team draw there's 15 chances to be in the same half of the draw and 16 chances to be in the other. 

However Celtic and Rangers can and do get knocked out early by other teams which is why we'd need more data as to what draws they were in together.

In seasons where someone else eliminates one or both of them the chances are lower

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not hot on maths formula: what are the odds of that 1961 > 1991 run where they drew each other 3 from a possible 47 in SFs? That is what got people's eyebrows raised: the conspiracy theory assigns it to draws being done in private, inferring they were arranged to keep an OF final possible, and that this ended when draws started to be televised.

You need the hot-n-cold balls myth to perpetuate the conspiracy theory into the TV era (illogically given the "apart" trend stops).


Btw, they did meet in earlier rounds, from time-to-time... the conspiracy theory is that, both having made SFs, it was desirable they be kept apart.

Indeed they sometimes met in LC groups so often people claimed it was a fix - after crowd trouble the chief magistrate even queried it in 1971 (being 4th time in 5 seasons).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, HibeeJibee said:
  1. 1891-92   SCO      TOGETHER
  2. 1893-94   SCO      APART
  3. 1898-99   SCO      APART
  4. 1899-00   SCO      TOGETHER
  5. 1901-02   SCO      APART
  6. 1903-04   SCO      APART
  7. 1904-05   SCO      TOGETHER
  8. 1908-09   SCO      APART
  9. 1924-25   SCO      TOGETHER
  10. 1925-26   SCO      APART
  11. 1927-28   SCO      APART
  12. 1928-29   SCO      APART
  13. 1947-48   SCO      APART
  14. 1951-52   LGE      TOGETHER
  15. 1953-54   SCO      APART
  16. 1957-58   LGE       APART
  17. 1959-60   SCO      TOGETHER
  18. 1961-62   SCO      APART
  19. 1962-63   SCO      APART
  20. 1964-65   LGE       APART
  21. 1965-66   LGE       APART
  22. 1965-66   SCO      APART
  23. 1966-67   LGE       APART
  24. 1968-69   SCO      APART
  25. 1970-71   LGE       APART
  26. 1970-71   SCO      APART
  27. 1971-72   SCO      APART
  28. 1972-73   LGE       APART
  29. 1972-73   SCO      APART
  30. 1973-74   LGE       TOGETHER
  31. 1975-76   LGE       APART
  32. 1976-77   LGE       APART
  33. 1976-77   SCO      APART
  34. 1977-78   LGE       APART
  35. 1978-79   LGE       TOGETHER
  36. 1979-80   SCO      APART
  37. 1980-81   SCO      APART
  38. 1982-83   LGE       APART
  39. 1982-83   SCO      APART
  40. 1983-84   LGE       APART
  41. 1986-87   LGE       APART
  42. 1988-89   SCO      APART
  43. 1989-90   LGE       APART
  44. 1990-91   LGE       APART
  45. 1991-92   SCO      TOGETHER
  46. 1992-93   LGE       APART
  47. 1993-94   LGE       TOGETHER
  48. 1995-96   SCO      TOGETHER
  49. 1997-98   SCO      TOGETHER
  50. 1998-99   SCO      APART
  51. 2000-01   LGE       TOGETHER
  52. 2001-02   LGE       TOGETHER
  53. 2001-02   SCO      APART
  54. 2002-03   LGE       APART
  55. 2008-09   LGE       APART
  56. 2010-11   LGE       APART
  57. 2014-15   LGE       TOGETHER
  58. 2015-16   SCO      TOGETHER
  59. 2016-17   LGE       TOGETHER
  60. 2016-17   SCO      TOGETHER
  61. 2017-18   LGE       APART
  62. 2017-18   SCO      TOGETHER
  63. 2018-19   LGE       APART
  64. 2018-19   SCO      TOGETHER

Sorry, got a bit annoyed at trying to discount the Glasgow Cup stuff so I took them all out. This is just Scottish and League Cup Semi Finals now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, The Master said:

We all make jokes about it, which is fine - but anyone who genuinely believes that any cup draw in the last 30 years or so has been rigged in favour of keeping the "Old Firm" apart needs their head examined. 

Nah no having that! They've been kept (possibly) together this time cos can you imagine the fallout if septic achieved the treble treble against them in the final????

So I'm calling fix!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some great stats on this thread.

They pretty much confirm my increasingly fallible recollections. 

Basically, until they met early in the 1990 Scottish Cup, I couldn't remember them ever playing each other in cups outside of finals.  It turns out the pattern went way earlier than anything I could remember too.

Since the Rangers re-birth of course, it's happened an awful lot, and when it's not, Aberdeen and Motherwell have prevented an OF final.  

 

Another myth actually concerned how many OF finals we got for a while, especially in the Scottish Cup.  I remember in 1999 when we got an OF final, someone asking the presenter on Radio 5 - might have been John Inverdale - how many there'd been in the last 20 years.  The pillock guessed 7, when the answer was actually just 1, and that was from 19 years before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...