ICTChris Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 A new documentary has been made on Michael Jackson, suggesting that the late singer was, in fact, a massive nonce and that he was probably guilty of the molestations he was accused of during his lifetime. The documentary, Leaving Neverland, features the stories of Wade Robson and James Safechuck, both of whom claim to have been absued by Jackson during the 1990s. Robson, now a judge on the US version of Strictly Come Dancing, acted as a witness for jackson in his trial in 2005, when he was acquited of molesting another young boy. Jackson and his estate deny all the allegations and have accused the director of cashing in. The director has denied this and defended the film, saying it's about victims of abuse and the cult of celebrity. In an interview with the BBC Dan Reed said that the documentary should serve a warning to those taken in by the cult of celebrity, something I think is very fair. It's amazing that people allowed a man like Jackson, clearly completely batshit, to have unsupervised access to their children. Do P&Bers think Jackson was a massive nonce or are they still believers? Would P&Bers allow a man in his 30s who lives in a theme park, looks like a melted crash test dummy and has a history of being accused of noncery unfettered access to their kids? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A.F.C Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 Bubbles might eat his banana but she ain't got a hair on her god damn body. You know what I'm talking about chamone eee heee Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTChris Posted February 25, 2019 Author Share Posted February 25, 2019 Chris Rock on the mid 2000s Jackson scandal "YES" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 5 minutes ago, ICTChris said: A new documentary has been made on Michael Jackson, suggesting that the late singer was, in fact, a massive nonce and that he was probably guilty of the molestations he was accused of during his lifetime. The documentary, Leaving Neverland, features the stories of Wade Robson and James Safechuck, both of whom claim to have been absued by Jackson during the 1990s. Robson, now a judge on the US version of Strictly Come Dancing, acted as a witness for jackson in his trial in 2005, when he was acquited of molesting another young boy. Jackson and his estate deny all the allegations and have accused the director of cashing in. The director has denied this and defended the film, saying it's about victims of abuse and the cult of celebrity. In an interview with the BBC Dan Reed said that the documentary should serve a warning to those taken in by the cult of celebrity, something I think is very fair. It's amazing that people allowed a man like Jackson, clearly completely batshit, to have unsupervised access to their children. Do P&Bers think Jackson was a massive nonce or are they still believers? Would P&Bers allow a man in his 30s who lives in a theme park, looks like a melted crash test dummy and has a history of being accused of noncery unfettered access to their kids? Quite interested to watch this documentary, when is it on? The final point is interesting, it always truly baffled me at the time of these accusations why any parent was allowing their kids to go and stay over at a celebrities house. It's just fucked up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTChris Posted February 25, 2019 Author Share Posted February 25, 2019 2 minutes ago, Dons_1988 said: Quite interested to watch this documentary, when is it on? The final point is interesting, it always truly baffled me at the time of these accusations why any parent was allowing their kids to go and stay over at a celebrities house. It's just fucked up. A week tonight on Channel 4, I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derry Alli Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 Will Wade Robson now be prosecuted for admitting to lying under oath? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 Controversial name for the programme IMO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanius Mullarkey Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 5 minutes ago, Gaz said: Controversial name for the programme IMO Thought it was the name of a new Greatest Hits album when I saw the title. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Watson Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 2 hours ago, Dons_1988 said: Quite interested to watch this documentary, when is it on? The final point is interesting, it always truly baffled me at the time of these accusations why any parent was allowing their kids to go and stay over at a celebrities house. It's just fucked up. Likewise. There must be a case for prosecutions against the parents for allowing this. Thankfully, the days of celebrities being able to fúck whoever they want are well and truly on the way out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 2 hours ago, Gaz said: Controversial name for the programme IMO Great title for a musical imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
throbber Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 I said this a year ago, and I still stand by it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skerla Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 2 hours ago, Dons_1988 said: Quite interested to watch this documentary, when is it on? The final point is interesting, it always truly baffled me at the time of these accusations why any parent was allowing their kids to go and stay over at a celebrities house. It's just fucked up. Think in all or most cases the parents stayed at the house too? Sometimes even in the same ‘bedroom’ as the kids and Jackson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTChris Posted February 25, 2019 Author Share Posted February 25, 2019 I remember when Jacko was acquited in the 2005 trial, a fan outside the court released a white dove after every 'Not Guilty' verdict. What was she going to do with the doves if he'd been found guilty? Rip their heads off? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 2 hours ago, Skerla said: Think in all or most cases the parents stayed at the house too? Sometimes even in the same ‘bedroom’ as the kids and Jackson. That would make more sense although it's still weird Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTChris Posted February 25, 2019 Author Share Posted February 25, 2019 For some not suitable for work thoughts on it, here's Dave Chappelle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Moonster Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 If his voice/moves didn't make loads of people loads of money he'd have been submitted to a padded room years ago. The people around him wanted his money though so his problems went largely covered up and this is the consequence. Serious questioned got to be asked of the parents - from MJ's parents to the kids parents IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Venti Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dee Man Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 I can't say I've noticed it before but if you look really closely it looks as though MJ might have had some plastic surgery done on his face before his untimely demise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 3 hours ago, throbber said: I said this a year ago, and I still stand by it. Is that your line in the sand throbber? You can w**k in bed with kids, as long as you dont wake them up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mathematics Posted February 25, 2019 Share Posted February 25, 2019 Look at it this way: if you said that MJ abused your kids, and let him pay you off to stop it going to court, then you were either lying in the first place, or you don't deserve to have kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.