Jump to content

Accies v Sevco


Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Muzza81 said:

Rangers fans singing the cheer up Steve Clarke song. Really are a different breed.

The idiots just don't care.

2 minutes ago, Dele said:

Kamara has been outstanding.

An absolute steal at £50k, can see him being a first team pick.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 146
  • Created
  • Last Reply
5 minutes ago, The Real Saints said:

I understand that it's easy to criticise Hamilton's performance so far, but there's not much you can do when Jermain Defoe is putting in such indomitable performances every single week. He has just scored his fourth goal in eight appearancesHe has been responsible for 33.3% of Rangers' goals this afternoon, meaning that Rangers would have only scored two goals without him. 

IMG_1329.GIF.a9a1938508f19b4c40423640f069f528.GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Absolutely suicidal line up.

Scott Martin should be in there before Mimnaugh every day of the week.

Offering lip service to fans by looking like an attacking team selection but defensively conceding the game before it even starts.

Easy away win by many, many goals I fear.
Fucking called it.

Completely defensively illiterate.
Only change is we now play more attacking players - our defence is still horrendous & nothing has been done to address this as far as I can see.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BBC feed:

43 mins

PENALTY FOR RANGERS

Hamilton 0-3 Rangers

Ryan Kent is inside the Hamilton box and pulls the ball back for Daniel Candeias, whose shot is blocked by referee Nick Walsh awards a penalty for Ziggy Gordon's late challenge on Kent.

 

So the pass is completed, a shot is taken, the ref blocks it and proceeds to give Rangers a penalty for a challenge that did not prevent Kent from completing the pass he made? Or have they messed up even more of that than is obvious here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, gkneil said:

So the pass is completed, a shot is taken, the ref blocks it and proceeds to give Rangers a penalty for a challenge that did not prevent Kent from completing the pass he made? Or have they messed up even more of that than is obvious here?

It was a foul for a late tackle.  There was nothing at all contentious about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...