Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Gb1985

Clark Vs Gerrard diving comments

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, bennett said:

 

Are you seriously trying to deny that Broadfoot feigned an injury :lol:

 

 

 

At the risk of sounding like an SFA compliance officer..... there is insufficient evidence available to back up your accusation

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Casual Observer said:

Surely Lee Clark is nothing to do with it since he left the club long before the incident you’re getting excited about?

He doesn’t use Clarke because it’s the Irish catholic spelling and he’s a bigot

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Romeo said:

I think seethie g and SSC should have a square go on PPV.

I'd easily pay a tenner.

Giro week?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, killiefan27 said:

He doesn’t use Clarke because it’s the Irish catholic spelling and he’s a bigot

If true, what a sad way to live your life. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, killiefan27 said:

He doesn’t use Clarke because it’s the Irish catholic spelling and he’s a bigot

The  thread is titled " Clark Vs Gerrard diving comments"

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
If true, what a sad way to live your life. 

Although being the type of person that knows which spelling of Clark(e) is the Catholic one is pretty sad in its own right

 

Unfortunately, thanks to killiefan27, we’re now that type of people too

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, Casual Observer said:

If true, what a sad way to live your life. 

That's f**k all. He also enjoys pretending to be a female Viking, named Vicky, whilst hiding out in a grotty B&B....... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, Iain said:

"Insufficient evidence". Ha. :lol::blink:

tenor.gif.466802ee6b67a0fb64ea054e7597a6a1.gif

I'm with the Compliance Officer on this one, clearly insufficient evidence......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, killiefan27 said:

 

Screenshot 2019-02-06 at 00.56.28.png

Screenshot 2019-02-06 at 00.56.38.png

Screenshot 2019-02-06 at 00.56.48.png

FFS @bennett, that takes some doing, having more history than your team has of SFA cover ups..... 

 

Edited by C4mmy31

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think what we can all take away from this thread is the fact that Rangers, their team, their fans and their manager are absolute scum.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, bennett said:

I seem to recall Broadfoot diving and feigning injury to get a player sent off and Clarks reaction was......

 

 

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor broadfoot and jack

Are you seriously suggesting that a Senior Scottish Referee that close to the incident with an uninterrupted view could make a mistake that would be detrimental to "the rangers"?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

RANDOM FACT:  James Tavernier of the rangers currently sits in fourth place in the Scottish Premiership Goals table after 24 games with 8 goals,  every one a penalty.

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So to summarise;

A manager in Scotland's top flight - having previously voiced concerns relating to inconsistencies in both retrospective banning of players for simulation, and appeals on red cards - draws a comparison between two similar incidents, one of which his team were penalised for, and is roundly criticised by supporters and management of one club.

Why is it not in Rangers' interest to challenge for more consistency in these issues?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Especially since Slippy’s early season comments that there was an agenda against the The Rangers and it has been going on for years. I’d of thought he’d be at the forefront for demanding change and SFA accountability? Strangely quiet from Jabba on this. We (r) the people demand a Statement as the refereeing standards are not concomitant with fair play for all?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Estragon said:

So to summarise;

A manager in Scotland's top flight - having previously voiced concerns relating to inconsistencies in both retrospective banning of players for simulation, and appeals on red cards - draws a comparison between two similar incidents, one of which his team were penalised for, and is roundly criticised by supporters and management of one club.

Why is it not in Rangers' interest to challenge for more consistency in these issues?

I'll hazard a guess that it's because it suits them in this instance......

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

image.png.5397fbd1c31f667f5384738beebffcc4.png

Rangers' striker set to be banned at the start of next season
Play-actor Lafferty apologises for Charlie Mulgrew's red card

Perhaps the best act of simulation.

"But, but he looked at me and I anticipated a headbutt was forthcoming"  Kyle Laughaminute

Edited by Moonglum25

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...