MJC Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 (edited) 57 minutes ago, bennett said: The first time that Sevco have ever fallen foul of the system according to the little one and he's actually angry about it. You couldn't make it up.... In fairness, it's the first time I can remember McGregor 'falling foul of the system' and I don't see how anyone can seriously complain about it. The challenge was dangerous, reckless and intentional and he's been guilty of that sort of dirty play throughout his career and indeed has done it and got away with it on a good few occasions this season. You can't put in challenges like that repeatedly and expect to continually get away with it. There's been more high profile incidents obviously, but he very deliberately 'landed' on Peter Hartley elbow first at Fir Park back at the start of the season and got off scot free that day and faced no retrospective punishment then booted a Celtic player the very next week...and again got away with no action being taken against him. He's pushed his luck too far it seems this time. Edited February 13, 2019 by MJC 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 They are simply incapable of ever taking one on the chin. What a despicable mob. Violent bigots to a man. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hawkeye the Gnu Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 1 hour ago, Bairnardo said: Rangers have FINALLY fallen foul of the system then, and they choose now to decide a full review of the system is needed. Not following mass confusion at Morelos successful appeal at the start of the season, not following McGregors multiple instances of lashing out, not following Morelos three imcidents in the Celtic match, where many disagreed with the rulings. Rangers want a review NOW.... Quelle suprise. They truly have the collective mind of a child, and more neck than all the Giraffes in the Sahara. Still at least them and the other cheek are so blind to their own humiliation that the rest of us can continue to enjoy it. FTOF Agree totally, but in all honesty, I've got more neck than all the giraffes in the Sahara........ 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 (edited) 48 minutes ago, DA Baracus said: Don't engage that piece of shit bennett. He doesn't engage anyone else. He types up his wee posts which he thinks are so chucklesome then runs away and won't respond to any points or questions. I genuinely think hes broken this time, waffling all over the forum, to posts that have nothing to do with Rangers, speaking about "sevco". Stuck him on ignore, in the hope it saves some threads in the same way ignoring Rab means I can read the Misc section again. Edited February 13, 2019 by RandomGuy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DA Baracus Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 Just now, RandomGuy. said: I genuinely think hes broken this time, waffling all over the forum, to posts that have nothing to do with Rangers, speaking about "sevco". Nah he knows what he's doing since it's simple stuff. He just a wee p***k who needs ignored. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 Is there seriously a single person on P&B who doesn't have bennett on ignore? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 May already have been mentioned, but how pathetic is the BBC article which ends with: Quote Former Rangers striker Billy Dodds on Sportsound: ... Former Celtic striker Scott McDonald on Sportsound: ... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
7-2 Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, Monkey Tennis said: 'Rangers' is not a plural. Well it wasn't up until 2012 anyway. Edited February 13, 2019 by 7-2 8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJC Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 2 minutes ago, nsr said: May already have been mentioned, but how pathetic is the BBC article which ends with: It is pathetic but they know their audience and tailor their reports and headlines accordingly. At the time James McFadden was our most sellable asset it wasn't uncommon for certain media outlets to refer to him as "Celtic fan/Hoops daft James McFadden" rather than "Motherwell player". 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingjoey Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 1 hour ago, bennett said: The little one tells us that this is the first time that Sevco have fallen foul of system, is that really true? He also tells that this is the first time we've had a problem with the system, is that really true? The little one.... Why are you so insecure that you never, ever engage in any meaningful discussion on here? All you do is reply to any text that you disagree with with some snide little remark that suits your agenda, which is that Rangers are right, and if anyone is not Rangers minded, then they are wrong. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingjoey Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, nsr said: Is there seriously a single person on P&B who doesn't have bennett on ignore? Me. No idea how to. Edited February 13, 2019 by kingjoey 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 1 hour ago, MJC said: In fairness, it's the first time I can remember McGregor 'falling foul of the system' and I don't see how anyone can seriously complain about it. The challenge was dangerous, reckless and intentional and he's been guilty of that sort of dirty play throughout his career and indeed has done it and got away with it on a good few occasions this season. You can't put in challenges like that repeatedly and expect to continually get away with it. There's been more high profile incidents obviously, but he very deliberately 'landed' on Peter Hartley elbow first at Fir Park back at the start of the season and got off scot free that day and faced no retrospective punishment then booted a Celtic player the very next week...and again got away with no action being taken against him. He's pushed his luck too far it seems this time. Usually though the type of tackles that you mention happen week in/week out and hardly merit a mention, the problem is that we have a partisan media blowing certain incidents out of proportion while ignoring others and an SFA disciplinary system that is quite bewildering. Should McGregor have dived head first for the ball, it's fairly usual for keepers to protect themselves against forwards charging in. The last week has probably left most fans puzzled by what's acceptable and what isn't. 4 minutes ago, kingjoey said: Why are you so insecure that you never, ever engage in any meaningful discussion on here? All you do is reply to any text that you disagree with with some snide little remark that suits your agenda, which is that Rangers are right, and if anyone is not Rangers minded, then they are wrong. You do see the irony in the highlighted part of your post? On PnB Sevco is always wrong, everyone else is right. If meaningful discussion is received then it will be returned. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsr Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 9 minutes ago, kingjoey said: Me. No idea how to. You on your phone? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DA Baracus Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 20 minutes ago, kingjoey said: Why are you so insecure that you never, ever engage in any meaningful discussion on here? All you do is reply to any text that you disagree with with some snide little remark that suits your agenda, which is that Rangers are right, and if anyone is not Rangers minded, then they are wrong. Because he's a wee fanny troll. No idea how anyone is thick enough to still not get that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Marly Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 You do see the irony in the highlighted part of your post? On PnB Sevco is always wrong, everyone else is right. If meaningful discussion is received then it will be returned. aww just f**k OFF! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Kincardine Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 1 hour ago, nsr said: Is there seriously a single person on P&B who doesn't have bennett on ignore? Not you, obviously. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomGuy. Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 31 minutes ago, kingjoey said: Me. No idea how to. Account - Ignored Users - Type his name in and make sure you tick the box for posts. Don't confirm you've done it though, or he'll get so desperate for your attention you'll find hes started dotting all your posts. If @Div could make the ignore function ignore shite like that aswell, it would be perfect, I can't be arsed scrolling through 10 notifications every hour from him. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MJC Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 28 minutes ago, bennett said: Usually though the type of tackles that you mention happen week in/week out and hardly merit a mention, the problem is that we have a partisan media blowing certain incidents out of proportion while ignoring others and an SFA disciplinary system that is quite bewildering. Should McGregor have dived head first for the ball, it's fairly usual for keepers to protect themselves against forwards charging in. The last week has probably left most fans puzzled by what's acceptable and what isn't. You do see the irony in the highlighted part of your post? On PnB Sevco is always wrong, everyone else is right. If meaningful discussion is received then it will be returned. I don't disagree that there is a section of the media who magnify any incident relating to your club significantly more than they would do for a player of any other club and indeed, fans of various other clubs follow suit in that regard but it doesn't change the fact that your goalkeeper has plenty of 'previous' when it comes to 'dirty' challenges which he has got away with on a good few occasions over the past season alone. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loonytoons Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 You do see the irony in the highlighted part of your post? On PnB Sevco is always wrong, everyone else is right. If meaningful discussion is received then it will be returned. You are aware that there was no "protection" necessary when he gathered the ball? It wasn't a 50:50 or a 70:30 or even a 90:10. He was 100% collecting that ball and the forward wasn't posing any physical danger to the 'keeper; no diving in, raised foot or stamp.The "protection" argument is typical diversionary babble kicked up by those that think they can cheat the correct decision making of the appropriate authority.Sevco are the equivalent of someone getting clocked doing 140 mph and querying the validity of the instruments calibration.At least the Sevco mouthpiece McAllister looked thoroughly embarrassed on tv when he defended the foul. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alta-pete Posted February 13, 2019 Share Posted February 13, 2019 They are simply incapable of ever taking one on the chin. What a despicable mob. Violent bigots to a man.Not me chief. Can you make that us all -1 please? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.