Jump to content

Aberdeen vs A Class Above Aberdeen


Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, bennett said:

The first time that Sevco have ever fallen foul of the system according to the little one and he's actually angry about it.

 

You couldn't make it up....

 

 

In fairness, it's the first time I can remember McGregor 'falling foul of the system' and I don't see how anyone can seriously complain about it. The challenge was dangerous, reckless and intentional and he's been guilty of that sort of dirty play throughout his career and indeed has done it and got away with it on a good few occasions this season. You can't put in challenges like that repeatedly and expect to continually get away with it. There's been more high profile incidents obviously, but he very deliberately 'landed' on Peter Hartley elbow first at Fir Park back at the start of the season and got off scot free that day and faced no retrospective punishment then booted a Celtic player the very next week...and again got away with no action being taken against him. He's pushed his luck too far it seems this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 887
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, Bairnardo said:

Rangers have FINALLY fallen foul of the system then, and they choose now to decide a full review of the system is needed. 

Not following mass confusion at Morelos successful appeal at the start of the season, not following McGregors multiple instances of lashing out, not following Morelos three imcidents in the Celtic match, where many disagreed with the rulings. Rangers want a review NOW....

Quelle suprise. They truly have the collective mind of a child, and more neck than all the Giraffes in the Sahara

Still at least them and the other cheek are so blind to their own humiliation that the rest of us can continue to enjoy it. 

FTOF

Agree totally, but in all honesty, I've got more neck than all the giraffes in the Sahara........:)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, DA Baracus said:

Don't engage that piece of shit bennett. He doesn't engage anyone else. He types up his wee posts which he thinks are so chucklesome then runs away and won't respond to any points or questions.

I genuinely think hes broken this time, waffling all over the forum, to posts that have nothing to do with Rangers, speaking about "sevco".

Stuck him on ignore, in the hope it saves some threads in the same way ignoring Rab means I can read the Misc section again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RandomGuy. said:

I genuinely think hes broken this time, waffling all over the forum, to posts that have nothing to do with Rangers, speaking about "sevco".

 

Nah he knows what he's doing since it's simple stuff.

He just a wee p***k who needs ignored.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

May already have been mentioned, but how pathetic is the BBC article which ends with:
 

Quote

 

Former Rangers striker Billy Dodds on Sportsound:

...

Former Celtic striker Scott McDonald on Sportsound:

...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nsr said:

May already have been mentioned, but how pathetic is the BBC article which ends with:
 

 

It is pathetic but they know their audience and tailor their reports and headlines accordingly. 

At the time James McFadden was our most sellable asset it wasn't uncommon for certain media outlets to refer to him as "Celtic fan/Hoops daft James McFadden" rather than "Motherwell player".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bennett said:

The little one tells us that this is the first time that Sevco have fallen foul of system, is that really true?

He also tells that this is the first time we've had a problem with the system, is that really true?

The little one....

 

Why are you so insecure that you never, ever engage in any meaningful discussion on here? All you do is reply to any text that you disagree with with some snide little remark that suits your agenda, which is that Rangers are right, and if anyone is not Rangers minded, then they are wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, MJC said:

In fairness, it's the first time I can remember McGregor 'falling foul of the system' and I don't see how anyone can seriously complain about it. The challenge was dangerous, reckless and intentional and he's been guilty of that sort of dirty play throughout his career and indeed has done it and got away with it on a good few occasions this season. You can't put in challenges like that repeatedly and expect to continually get away with it. There's been more high profile incidents obviously, but he very deliberately 'landed' on Peter Hartley elbow first at Fir Park back at the start of the season and got off scot free that day and faced no retrospective punishment then booted a Celtic player the very next week...and again got away with no action being taken against him. He's pushed his luck too far it seems this time.

Usually though the type of tackles that you mention happen week in/week out and hardly merit a mention, the problem is that we have a partisan media blowing certain incidents out of proportion while ignoring others and an SFA disciplinary system that is quite bewildering.

Should McGregor have dived head first for the ball, it's fairly usual for keepers to protect themselves against forwards charging in. The last week has probably left most fans puzzled by what's acceptable and what isn't.

 

4 minutes ago, kingjoey said:

Why are you so insecure that you never, ever engage in any meaningful discussion on here? All you do is reply to any text that you disagree with with some snide little remark that suits your agenda, which is that Rangers are right, and if anyone is not Rangers minded, then they are wrong.

You do see the irony in the highlighted part of your post?

On PnB Sevco is always wrong, everyone else is right. If meaningful discussion is received then it will be returned.

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, kingjoey said:

Why are you so insecure that you never, ever engage in any meaningful discussion on here? All you do is reply to any text that you disagree with with some snide little remark that suits your agenda, which is that Rangers are right, and if anyone is not Rangers minded, then they are wrong.

Because he's a wee fanny troll.

No idea how anyone is thick enough to still not get that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, kingjoey said:

Me. No idea how to.

Account - Ignored Users - Type his name in and make sure you tick the box for posts.

Don't confirm you've done it though, or he'll get so desperate for your attention you'll find hes started dotting all your posts. If @Div could make the ignore function ignore shite like that aswell, it would be perfect, I can't be arsed scrolling through 10 notifications every hour from him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, bennett said:

Usually though the type of tackles that you mention happen week in/week out and hardly merit a mention, the problem is that we have a partisan media blowing certain incidents out of proportion while ignoring others and an SFA disciplinary system that is quite bewildering.

Should McGregor have dived head first for the ball, it's fairly usual for keepers to protect themselves against forwards charging in. The last week has probably left most fans puzzled by what's acceptable and what isn't.

 

You do see the irony in the highlighted part of your post?

On PnB Sevco is always wrong, everyone else is right. If meaningful discussion is received then it will be returned.

 

 

 

 

I don't disagree that there is a section of the media who magnify any incident relating to your club significantly more than they would do for a player of any other club and indeed, fans of various other clubs follow suit in that regard but it doesn't change the fact that your goalkeeper has plenty of 'previous' when it comes to 'dirty' challenges which he has got away with on a good few occasions over the past season alone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You do see the irony in the highlighted part of your post?
On PnB Sevco is always wrong, everyone else is right. If meaningful discussion is received then it will be returned.
 
 
 
 

You are aware that there was no "protection" necessary when he gathered the ball? It wasn't a 50:50 or a 70:30 or even a 90:10.
He was 100% collecting that ball and the forward wasn't posing any physical danger to the 'keeper; no diving in, raised foot or stamp.

The "protection" argument is typical diversionary babble kicked up by those that think they can cheat the correct decision making of the appropriate authority.
Sevco are the equivalent of someone getting clocked doing 140 mph and querying the validity of the instruments calibration.

At least the Sevco mouthpiece McAllister looked thoroughly embarrassed on tv when he defended the foul.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...