DeeTillEhDeh Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 Just watched the highlights - absolutely shocking display by Dallas - second penalty Defoe tripped over his own feet, third and fourth were both outside the box. And to compound it all he should have given the possible fifth penalty. Not the first time he's done this - bloody incompetent and shouldn't be near a top level match for some time to come. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 Inside / outside or penalty / no penalty is up for debate but whether or not it is a handball is not. Clear handball all day long Handball but outside the box. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wastecoatwilly Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 At least sevco's goal difference got a boost from the pens not that it will matter it the end of the season. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Munoz Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 4 minutes ago, wastecoatwilly said: At least sevco's goal difference got a boost from the pens not that it will matter it the end of the season. Goal difference could matter for us though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 7 minutes ago, wastecoatwilly said: At least sevco's goal difference got a boost from the pens not that it will matter it the end of the season. The Europa places look like they're going to be pretty tight this season Willie, goal difference may well matter. I reckon you guys have a pretty decent lead now too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobby_F Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 25 minutes ago, Munoz said: Goal difference could matter for us though. In case you haven’t realised by now - we don’t matter. The only club hurt by those dodgy penalty decisions is Celtic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Estragon Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 1st - stonewaller 2nd - agree with Michael Stewart. Not a penalty, but not a ban for Defoe. I can understand why it's been awarded at full speed certainly. But yes, a mistake. 3Rd - thought it looked like there was a second handball within the box. Can understand why there's a controversy because there's definitely a handball outside the box first. 4th is a scandal. Worse than what Jordan Jones received a two match ban. Lets see what happens shall we?... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 1st - stonewaller 2nd - agree with Michael Stewart. Not a penalty, but not a ban for Defoe. I can understand why it's been awarded at full speed certainly. But yes, a mistake. 3Rd - thought it looked like there was a second handball within the box. Can understand why there's a controversy because there's definitely a handball outside the box first. 4th is a scandal. Worse than what Jordan Jones received a two match ban. Lets see what happens shall we?...Honestly, my take is similar. The 3rd I don’t know the rules, but he definitely handles the ball in the box, as well as outside. The second is a mistake, and the fourth is a dive, which is really impossible for the referee to spot. The first is certainly a penalty. I’m no Andrew Dallas fan, but it was a pretty freakish set of circumstances. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenburn bud Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 48 minutes ago, Savage Henry said: Honestly, my take is similar. The 3rd I don’t know the rules, but he definitely handles the ball in the box, as well as outside. The second is a mistake, and the fourth is a dive, which is really impossible for the referee to spot. The first is certainly a penalty. I’m no Andrew Dallas fan, but it was a pretty freakish set of circumstances. After watching the highlights on the BBC website, it's not that clearcut as the foul continues into the box when Tansey clearly pulls Candeias down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 After watching the highlights on the BBC website, it's not that clearcut as the foul continues into the box when Tansey clearly pulls Candeias down. Candeias got the slightest touch about 2 yards out then throws himself in to the box like a rugby player doing the old double movement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LogieLivi Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 Just gonna leave this here.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenburn bud Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 5 minutes ago, bennett said: After watching the highlights on the BBC website, it's not that clearcut as the foul continues into the box when Tansey clearly pulls Candeias down. You don’t actually believe what you are posting. It’s not even pie & bovril levels of trolling, you are just a dick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 3 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said: 6 minutes ago, bennett said: After watching the highlights on the BBC website, it's not that clearcut as the foul continues into the box when Tansey clearly pulls Candeias down. Candeias got the slightest touch about 2 yards out then throws himself in to the box like a rugby player doing the old double movement. https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/av/scotland/47111185 Tansey clearly pulls his shorts in the box, it was a penalty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EpicMike Posted February 3, 2019 Share Posted February 3, 2019 Gonna get some slack for this... 1. Stonewall penalty, no question. 2. Defoe makes a meal of it but was definitely tripped. Penalty. 3. Handball but outside the box, can't blame Dallas for this though as the linesman was the one who said it was inside. 4. Foul but outside the box and should have been a free-kick, only one Dallas can really be blamed for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobWilliamson Posted February 4, 2019 Share Posted February 4, 2019 5 hours ago, geo87 said: I’ll send you a private pm if there’s anymore of your nonsense Awwwwww f**k no a pm! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
starkssandshoes Posted February 4, 2019 Share Posted February 4, 2019 Just imagine it had been the other way around, Controversy, what controversy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coventry Saint Posted February 4, 2019 Share Posted February 4, 2019 6 hours ago, starkssandshoes said: Just imagine it had been the other way around, Controversy, what controversy? See, people keep saying 'imagine it was the other way around' but, while I'm able to imagine Eiza Gonzalez wanting a ride with me, there are limits to my imagination. Rangers having four penalties given against them is well beyond those limits. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buddie06smfc Posted February 4, 2019 Share Posted February 4, 2019 Gonna get some slack for this... 2. Defoe makes a meal of it but was definitely tripped. Penalty.Neither of these things happen. Defoe went down anticipating contact, according to Michael Stewart. No contact was forthcoming so he bounced straight back up. It is a dive he has conned the referee. Whether he gets up straight away or rolls around for 5 minutes is irrelevant. He should be banned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DXBBud Posted February 4, 2019 Share Posted February 4, 2019 11 minutes ago, buddie06smfc said: Neither of these things happen. Defoe went down anticipating contact, according to Michael Stewart. No contact was forthcoming so he bounced straight back up. It is a dive he has conned the referee. Whether he gets up straight away or rolls around for 5 minutes is irrelevant. He should be banned. Why go down "anticipating contact". Put on a coat to protect you from anticipated rain - reasonable; fall over in case you get tackled in a contact sport - REALLY ????????? If that's the case he should have been booked for simulation as he went down without contact, presumably with the hope of gaining an advantage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.