Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Baxter's Nutmeg

LL Relegation

Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Wee Smiler said:

wsnt it Whitehill who raised this at the last leauge meeting?

 

20 minutes ago, Wee Smiler said:

so propose a rule change just like others have done

Don't know I follow the club from afar.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 minutes ago, Jerry Macguire said:

Really that’s where you want to go. Imagine we must be the first club in the history of anything to play 30 miles from the hoose. Yeah but your right that’s what everybody in EoS & SoS leagues will be talking about, not the fact that we changed rules mid season just to save one club. Laying waste to any ambitions they had of being promoted. What was I thinking about. 

I'm fairly certain when yous were accepted it was nae t play over 30 miles away. 

Your still bitter aboot that tackle and have it in for ww. 

Imagine if aw this came from the star :thumsup2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Jerry Macguire said:

Common decency would be to respect the rules and get on with it.

And what were these rules in regards to teams dropping out after a season starts

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, newcastle broon said:

I'm fairly certain when yous were accepted it was nae t play over 30 miles away. 

Your still bitter aboot that tackle and have it in for ww. 

Imagine if aw this came from the star :thumsup2

I seem to have touched a nerve. Bringing up the tackle on Adam Strachan is totally uncalled for. That lads playing career could be over and your throwing that at me.  Class real class.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Midge said:

Or perhaps they are of the opinion they knew at the start of the season only one club would be leaving the division and now that one has it’s unfair that Whitehill or any other club in that position should be relegated in this way.

That's incorrect, as there's always a chance that two clubs can be relegated - this season if Cove win the play-off against Albion Rovers then Whitehill as club 15 would still be getting relegated.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Ginaro said:

That's incorrect, as there's always a chance that two clubs can be relegated - this season if Cove win the play-off against Albion Rovers then Whitehill as club 15 would still be getting relegated.

Does that mean club 14 go down now under same senario

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Ginaro said:

That's incorrect, as there's always a chance that two clubs can be relegated - this season if Cove win the play-off against Albion Rovers then Whitehill as club 15 would still be getting relegated.

That would also relegate the 14th placed team which nobody expected at the start of the season.

The constitution doesn't mention an EGM but a Special General Meeting

image.png.61586cff9ff59ced552fd855ce5af68a.png

So there's got to be 3 clubs involved in this if its happening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, magoo said:

And what were these rules in regards to teams dropping out after a season starts

Rule H4 covers that eventuality.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, FairWeatherFan said:
8 minutes ago, Ginaro said:

 

That would also relegate the 14th placed team which nobody expected at the start of the season.

It does say In order to maintain a membership of sixteen clubs, the following will apply if there is an inequality between clubs entering and leaving the league through promotion and relegation: - could be argued that the first part of that would be fulfilled if Cove won the play-off as Albion would fill the 16th place?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Jerry Macguire said:

I seem to have touched a nerve. Bringing up the tackle on Adam Strachan is totally uncalled for. That lads playing career could be over and your throwing that at me.  Class real class.

Too right you've touched a nerve nobody mentioned it being ww then you come in wi both feet and expect me/us to sit back. 

I'm Rosewell born and bred and will follow them no matter what league they're in in the forseeable but let's no aw play the high and mighty here,you've forgot where yous came from. 

Edited by newcastle broon

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Ginaro said:

It does say In order to maintain a membership of sixteen clubs, the following will apply if there is an inequality between clubs entering and leaving the league through promotion and relegation: - could be argued that the first part of that would be fulfilled if Cove won the play-off as Albion would fill the 16th place?

I asked when it was decided that 15th would count as the bottom club if it meant 14th was also at risk of relegation laid out in B4 (b) (HL promoted, SPFL42 relegated to LL). The response:

image.thumb.png.3955258c6ca86ebc4f21b4c2aa4459a1.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well then, looks like relegation has been taken care and the only thing left to sort is who replaces Selkirk (unsure if 14th or 15th could even apply?) - surely they'll need to open up applications for that position at some point so they can choose from the licensed teams at the end of March.

Assuming of course the clubs don't get together and decide to change the rules - that would be very sneaky.

Edited by Ginaro

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, newcastle broon said:

Too right you've touched a nerve nobody mentioned it being ww then you come in wi both feet and expect me/us to sit back. 

I'm Rosewell born and bred and will follow them no matter what league they're in in the forseeable but let's no as play the high and mighty here,you've forgot where yous came from. 

As I said others mentioned Welfare before me. In any case you don’t need to be a rocket scientist to figure out where this is coming from.

I have an opinion, it’s my own opinion and I think it’s valid. You can throw whatever shit you like in my direction but you won’t stop me from posting.

Fact is I love my trips to Ferguson Park, it’s where we won our first and to date only trophy.  High and mighty geeusabrek.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Jerry Macguire said:

As I said others mentioned Welfare before me. In any case you don’t need to be a rocket scientist to figure out where this is coming from.

I have an opinion, it’s my own opinion and I think it’s valid. You can throw whatever shit you like in my direction but you won’t stop me from posting.

Fact is I love my trips to Ferguson Park, it’s where we won our first and to date only trophy.  High and mighty geeusabrek.

Of course it's either ww or the star,they seem to be the only teams (ww at present) that are heading for bottom placed team. 

Who's stopping you from posting? 

It's good to get input from other teams fans in the league.

It's a fitba forum though there are gonnae be posts that are liked and disliked  :o  ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, newcastle broon said:

Of course it's either ww or the star,they seem to be the only teams (ww at present) that are heading for bottom placed team. 

Who's stopping you from posting? 

It's good to get input from other teams fans in the league.

It's a fitba forum though there are gonnae be posts that are liked and disliked  :o  ?

You went on the attack when no one was attacking you. The stuff about where we currently play and the tackle on Strachan was totally off point and completely unnecessary. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Jerry Macguire said:

It could go the other way. A team demanding a change of rules during the season to save their own skin does nothing for the credibility of the league. I would imagine that point won’t be lost on the board and may stand against them if they lose the vote at the EGM and then have to apply for re-entry. 

The fact that a team who was involved in setting the rules when the league was set up is now complaining about them because it doesn’t suit them is bad enough. But why leave it until now to make an issue of the decision made by the board at the start of the season? I dare say had Whitehill been sitting mid table they would have been quite happy with the rules as they are.

You started it :P

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Has anyone checked if Jason King is ok?  

Edited by Rab B Nesbit

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...