Jump to content

Poverty Proofing


ICTChris

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Chicken Wing said:
10 minutes ago, Hand As Porn said:
It reminded her of her lover, Mike, the bloke from three doors down.

The trainers belonged to Mike. He put his name on the so no bugger would nick them!

Mullarkey is now pondering his Jim tshirt, Levi jeans, Manuel jumper and Adebiyi bag.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The OP said:

A lot of parents do take the 'I'm not paying that for a jacket' attitude when they can afford it

This is me pretty much every day, and that's just buying things for myself.

Undoubtedly inherited from my parents who evidently taught me difference between a trendy label on what is cheaply made shite and paying a little bit more for quality. 

Anybody who's not part of some Antarctic expedition and is paying anything near a grand for a jacket is nothing but a trying-too-hard moron. Additionally, anyone buying the likes of a Mackenzie t-shirt is basically doing it to impress others rather than because they actually like it and think it's worth £30. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The OP said:

Banana in 'shite dad' shocker. 

There's an actual difference in roles between a mummy and daddy, bro.

If my kids are still sucking at their mummy's teat much after 18 then I'll reconsider your 'shite dad' proposal.

Edited by banana
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LondonHMFC said:

In Primary school I was dealt a pretty low hand in the clothing stakes, but this was because I was growing at a stupid speed. I can always remember when "poppers" came into fashion. Not that stuff you sniff, but the trousers that had buttons all the way up the side (a perverts dream). My Mum refused to buy me Adidas one's, instead taking me to the 'More Store' and getting some delightful two stripe one's. 

After a day of ribbing, I came home and told her I wouldn't be wearing them again, so bless her she stitched on another stripe. to imitate the Adidas design. However she only did one leg for some reason. I got called "Five Stripes" for fucking years. 

Div should change your user name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Somewhat of an irony that we are protecting children from being bullied because they're poor when a Tory government will just wait until they're adults to attack them for being poor.

Sadly you can't run to a teacher or yer mammy because the Eton crew have cut yet benefits and housing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Melanius Mullarkey said:

 

625A7D63-5605-452C-8EC4-3176C3F065E0.jpeg

Young Farquhar Nathaniel Dee-Man III looking resplendent as ever.

The thing that strikes me most about that photo is that Rees-Mogg has had sexual intercourse at least 6 times. 

6 hours ago, Melanius Mullarkey said:

Yes. Why else would you buy a pair of “Mikes”?

Maybe your mum got you cheap clothes as her alcohol habit wasn't going to pay for itself. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Dee Man said:

 

The thing that strikes me most about that photo is that Rees-Mogg has had sexual intercourse at least 6 times. 

One at least was cloned from his wanksock.

P.S. Full names:

image.png.191bca7eff1c226413229d2960d78bb8.png

At least they'll have plenty names to choose from to call themselves.

Edited by welshbairn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Rowan said:

Sixtus!?!

The sixth son in the Rees Mogg family has always been sent to Rome at 4 to be trained up for being Pope. It's a family tradition but it never worked.

Edited by welshbairn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, banana said:

There's an actual difference in roles between a mummy and daddy, bro.

If my kids are still sucking at their mummy's teat much after 18 then I'll reconsider your 'shite dad' proposal.

It’s not a proposal, it’s an observation based upon the available evidence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Hedgecutter said:

This is me pretty much every day, and that's just buying things for myself.

Undoubtedly inherited from my parents who evidently taught me difference between a trendy label on what is cheaply made shite and paying a little bit more for quality. 

Anybody who's not part of some Antarctic expedition and is paying anything near a grand for a jacket is nothing but a trying-too-hard moron. Additionally, anyone buying the likes of a Mackenzie t-shirt is basically doing it to impress others rather than because they actually like it and think it's worth £30. 

Tbf the type of bams who used to buy Berghaus and Helly Hansen jackets did spend a lot of time hanging about outside shops, chippies and bus stops in winter in Scotland. Not sure that the spice boys cutting about these days have that excuse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, The OP said:

It’s not a proposal, it’s an observation based upon the available evidence.

Fair enough. Observation, proposal, analysis, blah blah.

Off home to experience a welcome home from said nippers now, nothing quite like it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...