Jump to content

The Meh Derby - 24/11/2018 - When Juggernauts collide


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 304
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Kris Boyd making no attempt to play the ball and backing into the defender over a yard away from the ball discussed as a penalty claim on sportscene, whereas Chris Kane taken out in the box by a defender making no attempt to play the ball not mentioned after the highlights.

Makes sense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Lang Toon Saintee said:

Nope still.not quite there yet..You really need to cut down with the obvious seethe and inject a bit of reality..

I have no seethe at all as you suggest, I'm just curious as to your supposed position as some kind of Guru. Do you resort to invention and the same monotonous diatribe in every day life or is it just here? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, PauloPerth said:

Kris Boyd making no attempt to play the ball and backing into the defender over a yard away from the ball discussed as a penalty claim on sportscene, whereas Chris Kane taken out in the box by a defender making no attempt to play the ball not mentioned after the highlights.

Makes sense

It's because Clarke has been in the media today moaning about not getting a penalty, while Tommy Wright never mentioned it.

Actually watching the footage and picking up key points seems a struggle for Sportscene, so they rely on the press telling them what to show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said:

It's because Clarke has been in the media today moaning about not getting a penalty, while Tommy Wright never mentioned it.

Actually watching the footage and picking up key points seems a struggle for Sportscene, so they rely on the press telling them what to show.

They every week try to find something negative about saints and of course Kris Boyd is a pal. On the highlights the one with Chris Kane looked worse than at the game.

We always miss them anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said:

Actually watching the footage and picking up key points seems a struggle for Sportscene, so they rely on the press telling them what to show.

This is very true. To be fair to Stewart and Thomson, both dismissed Boyd's claim without a hint of uncertainty. As mentioned, the simple fact that Boyd has been claiming it was a stonewaller was justification to discuss it in their eyes.

For the Kane one, you often see a centre back block off a strikers run, but usually by stopping in his path. The killie defender actually charges into Kane to take him out, almost like an American football block. Stonewall penalty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, PauloPerth said:

For the Kane one, you often see a centre back block off a strikers run, but usually by stopping in his path. The killie defender actually charges into Kane to take him out, almost like an American football block. Stonewall penalty.

Boyd absolutely isn't a penalty, but what you've written is judt ludicrous. Defender takes a single step, hardly a fucking "charge". Absolutely zero chance of the forward getting anywhere near the ball FFS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thought we dominated large spells of the game without having that final piece of quality to finish them off, totally bossed the second half. Hope Brophy is back soon as he would not have held back today when others were fannying about instead of having a shot. 
I have no idea how Saints have won five games on the spin as they remind me of Hamilton with the time wasting and claiming  every time one of them fell over or a Killie player had the audacity to tackle the precious souls. 
Disappointed with just the point but we move on to next week and hopefully put a few past poor Neil's lot.


Roaster alert [emoji23]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Estragon said:

Boyd absolutely isn't a penalty, but what you've written is judt ludicrous. Defender takes a single step, hardly a fucking "charge". Absolutely zero chance of the forward getting anywhere near the ball FFS.

Thats shite, watch it again. The defender has a look up and sees Kane running in and takes him out. It's a foul. It's in the box. It's a penalty.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, kennysmassiveego said:

The long  and the short of it we are still above you GIRFUY 

On course to finish above us for the third time in ten seasons, can see why you're excited.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, RandomGuy. said:

1543174450236892.gif.e11262d46695aaa9c28f677d5c35897d.gif

Not even worthy of discussion

1543174540236861.gif.a32576bbb29b124c05dd51de81596523.gif

Stonewaller

Sportscene logic.

I wasn’t at the game, but don’t think either is a penalty.

Ours is a free-kick on the edge of the box IMO, before it reaches Boyd.

Saints one is more of a shout, and it was a very silly challenge, but the striker is never getting near the ball and it’s not a violent or dangerous challenge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PauloPerth said:

Thats shite, watch it again. The defender has a look up and sees Kane running in and takes him out. It's a foul. It's in the box. It's a penalty.

 

Dry your eyes ffs..... we're now into Monday morning & your still seethin about a nothin incident.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...