HughieMc Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 1 hour ago, Wadsley said: Somehow I now have Doris Day in my head. Whatever Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawfield shed boy Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 Time wasting didn’t even really have an affect on our goal. We scored in the 91st minute. Game lasts for 90. No?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HughieMc Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 19 minutes ago, shawfield shed boy said: 7 hours ago, Adolfo Rios said: Time wasting didn’t even really have an affect on our goal. We scored in the 91st minute. Game lasts for 90. No?? This will be a debate worth following with interest........ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantis Toboggan Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 Yup.. clear foul for Stirling's disallowed goal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adolfo Rios Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 Game lasts for 90. No?? Yeah, but I would have said the first minutes of additional time were for subs. Not many matches will have finished on 90 minutes with or without gamesmanship. Regardless, we scored. 1st, 91st or 93rd. As long as it’s us scoring that’s all that matters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde01 Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 Decent highlights package.That was a perfectly good goal Stirling had ruled out, grant far too easily beaten at the back post.Think criticism of Currie at the goal is harsh, was blasted at him from pretty close range, he was just unlucky it fell to their player.Who was the trialist at no18 for Albion? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cfcuk Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 Decent highlights package.That was a perfectly good goal Stirling had ruled out, grant far too easily beaten at the back post.Think criticism of Currie at the goal is harsh, was blasted at him from pretty close range, he was just unlucky it fell to their player.Who was the trialist at no18 for Albion?Blasted ? I think it's poor goalkeeping and grant doesn't react infact watches the ball come in and only moves when the Stirling player goes for the ball . I still don't see much wrong with Stirling goal A terrific delivery from Rankin for the one cogill hits the post. I thought Rankin did ok on Saturday I think the criticism of DGW is laughable look at the gets virtually nothing to his feet and no support when he has the ball can't remember the last time one of our midfielders went beyond him Positives cogill looks like he is getting back to his best, Kris S looks a player We need to sort out the left back position But we really need to get a settled 11 I would play same team Saturday If Stewart is fit I would replace grant If not then there is really no other option than stick with grant at left back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David W Posted November 12, 2018 Share Posted November 12, 2018 17 minutes ago, Clyde01 said: Decent highlights package. That was a perfectly good goal Stirling had ruled out, grant far too easily beaten at the back post. Think criticism of Currie at the goal is harsh, was blasted at him from pretty close range, he was just unlucky it fell to their player. Who was the trialist at no18 for Albion? Agree. Agree. Obviously. Michael McIndoe, ex-Doncaster Rovers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mo83 Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 Agree. Agree. Obviously. Michael McIndoe, ex-Doncaster Rovers.How did he play? Quite impressive CV on the lad,noticed he is 38 though can't have many more years left. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Come Away The Clyde Posted November 13, 2018 Author Share Posted November 13, 2018 Thought the crowd was decent (said to my son at the game looks like around the 800 mark) reading in the papers crowd was 500 odd, seems odd as Stirling had a decent wee turnout as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David W Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 Good guess; the attendance was 804. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeanMck Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 Currie definitely at fault with that goal. And not for the first time this season! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaggy Snake Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 Cogill is arguably as much at fault for the goal as Currie. He was originally marking the Stirling player who crossed the ball, but chose to run back towards his own goal leaving them acres of space, so when the cross came in Cogill was doing literally nothing. That would have been fine if he’d passed on his marking to a midfielder, but they were too slow to react and get back. Then you have McNiff caught on the back foot, allowing the first effort to come in far too easily, before Currie parries it. Finally Grant, who’s starting position was actually good, being too slow to react to the rebound. Currie will be disappointed but there’s blame all round for that goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wadsley Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 19 hours ago, HughieMc said: Whatever Que sera. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxruby Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 Good guess; the attendance was 804.Yes it was. It says so on the Official site. Why the debate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLClyde Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 Watching the highlights it looked much more than the original 500 odd that was reported. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Jung Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 1 hour ago, maxruby said: Yes it was. It says so on the Official site. Why the debate? Seemingly because information had led Stirling Albion to put up the 541 figure- wherever that had come from. But then- airing the dirty laundry (literally, as it could appear in this case) seems to be the way of the all-new transparent, yet quasi-authoritarian blueprint being displayed in certain quarters. This attention to detail was certainly lacking in previous seasons- well, among the mainstream it was, anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxruby Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 Thanks for that. My Ovaltine will taste extra malty tonight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cfcuk Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 Currie definitely at fault with that goal. And not for the first time this season! he wasn't solely at fault for the goal the defending wasn't clever but it as poor goalkeeping, didn't really had a lot to do on Saturday In summary not the worst I have seen ,bang average goalkeeper but seems to have quite a fan club amongst the support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Jung Posted November 13, 2018 Share Posted November 13, 2018 11 minutes ago, cfcuk said: 6 hours ago, DeanMck said: Currie definitely at fault with that goal. And not for the first time this season! he wasn't solely at fault for the goal the defending wasn't clever but it as poor goalkeeping, didn't really had a lot to do on Saturday In summary not the worst I have seen ,bang average goalkeeper but seems to have quite a fan club amongst the support. Joining the ranks of John Sweeney, Iain Gray, Pat Scullion, Jamie Barclay, David Gormley and Scott Ferguson. We used to be a knowledgable support. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.