Melanius Mullarkey Posted October 1, 2018 Share Posted October 1, 2018 1 hour ago, Jimboyjones1976 said: I agree. Thing is though that posters on this thread are posting pictures of Logan and making comments that imply that if a Celtic fan boos him then they are racist so maybe it hasn’t died down for them. They’re “probably” right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dee Man Posted October 1, 2018 Share Posted October 1, 2018 2 hours ago, Jimboyjones1976 said: Even before the Tonev incident, I never liked this wee p***k. Tbh, I never believed the judgement that the SFA handed out. My initial thoughts on the situation was that Logan, the wee p***k, was now a wee p***k who had also used the race card against a player from my team. The SFA’s judgement was based on probability, and this from an organisation that couldn’t manage their own dinner. Personally, if this was racist, it should have been dealt with by the law, not the SFA. They are simply not equipped to deal with an issue like this. When racism, or racist incidents happen on the pitch, that doesn’t mean it should be handled by the governing body. It should be handled by the law. It wasn’t. I don’t even think there was enough evidence or back up testimony to make it a case in law. The fact that the SFA dealt with it meant that a very serious and shameful tag was handed to Tonev and was handed down without the thorough process of law. Tonev was branded the worst of the worst based on probability. Probability isn’t fact. Imagine how many wrongful convictions we’d have if law was based on probability. Fact is that Logan walked away from it only because he “seemed convincing” according to the SFA, who also managed to judge on Tonev’s convincibility even though he needed the manager to help with the language. I believe there were words between Logan and Tonev. But there’s no proof of the type needed to label someone racist in a legal sense. To this end, I’m still yet to be convinced that racist language was used and that Logan since then has gone out of his way to wind up Celtic and their fans. Pity is that he’s shite at doing that. Just because someone doesn’t believe he wasn’t racially abused doesn’t make that person racist themselves. However, someone who instantly judges someone who doesn’t believe Logan as racist, is probably more dangerous and narrow minded a person. Anyway, Logan has always been a wee p***k even before the Tonev clash. He still is. Lacks class and I wouldn’t be in tears to see him getting his puss smacked by a hearty Boyata challenge. Headsgone. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Day Posted October 1, 2018 Share Posted October 1, 2018 Who won the sectarian sing song competition? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The OP Posted October 1, 2018 Share Posted October 1, 2018 21 minutes ago, Green Day said: Who won the sectarian sing song competition? We didn't sing any songs at all and Aberdeen, to be fair to them, didn't mention Jimmy Savile or charge out any songs English provincial clubs used to sing about Liverpool slums or hubcaps or that in the early 1990s. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted October 1, 2018 Author Share Posted October 1, 2018 We didn't sing any songs at all and Aberdeen, to be fair to them, didn't mention Jimmy Savile or charge out any songs English provincial clubs used to sing about Liverpool slums or hubcaps or that in the early 1990s. I was singing about the IRA and their hats from start to finish mate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The OP Posted October 1, 2018 Share Posted October 1, 2018 8 minutes ago, Romeo said: I was singing about the IRA and their hats from start to finish mate. Ira Gershwin? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coprolite Posted October 1, 2018 Share Posted October 1, 2018 "convincibility" will use this in conversation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wastecoatwilly Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 Scott McKenna: Aberdeen defender faces ban over tackle on Odsonne Edouard - BBC Sport A bit late but worse than a red. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingjoey Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 2 minutes ago, wastecoatwilly said: Scott McKenna: Aberdeen defender faces ban over tackle on Odsonne Edouard - BBC Sport A bit late but worse than a red. How can it be worse than a red? Some other colour? And he wasn’t late, because he got the ball. This retrospective panel are having a whale of a time this season. Unbelievable. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wastecoatwilly Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 2 minutes ago, kingjoey said: How can it be worse than a red? Some other colour? And he wasn’t late, because he got the ball. This retrospective panel are having a whale of a time this season. Unbelievable. You only get a one match ban for a red,given him two is worse than a red? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 LOL Why do we even bother Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanius Mullarkey Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 11 minutes ago, wastecoatwilly said: Scott McKenna: Aberdeen defender faces ban over tackle on Odsonne Edouard - BBC Sport A bit late but worse than a red. Should be charged by the Glesga Polis IMO. Hang the c**t. How dare he. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wastecoatwilly Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 5 minutes ago, Dons_1988 said: LOL Why do we even bother I also think this is a joke,if he had got a yellow nothing else would've happened,if he got a red it would be a one match ban,the fact he got nothing during the game he gets a two match ban. For me this is wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
betting competition Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 I thought McKenna won the ball although his momentum caught the player after it. To get a 2 game ban is saying that McKenna tried to deliberately injure Edouard and that is wrong. The SFA really have it in for Aberdeen this season and we must try and change this system to make it fair as possible for all clubs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted October 3, 2018 Author Share Posted October 3, 2018 People still think getting the ball means no foul? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guts Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 32 minutes ago, kingjoey said: How can it be worse than a red? Some other colour? And he wasn’t late, because he got the ball. This retrospective panel are having a whale of a time this season. Unbelievable. It was an outrageous challenge. He should have been red carded during the game for a waist high two footed tackle, even if he did get a touch on the ball. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wastecoatwilly Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 1 minute ago, betting competition said: The SFA really have it in for Aberdeen It's not the SFA it's a independent panel of ex-referees that decides. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 It is better to booteth your opponents squarely up the fundament than it is to make an honest & fair challenge that annoyeths ra sellik or ra bearz.Here endeth the lesson. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jute Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 4 minutes ago, betting competition said: I thought McKenna won the ball although his momentum caught the player after it. To get a 2 game ban is saying that McKenna tried to deliberately injure Edouard and that is wrong. The SFA really have it in for Aberdeen this season and we must try and change this system to make it fair as possible for all clubs. Exactly. There is clearly no intent to make contact with Edouard but SFA are give him a ban that suggest violent conduct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingjoey Posted October 3, 2018 Share Posted October 3, 2018 13 minutes ago, wastecoatwilly said: It's not the SFA it's a independent panel of ex-referees that decides. Someone that actually knows how the system works. You should go on Sportsound. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.