BawWatchin Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 6 minutes ago, Highlandmagyar 2nd Tier said: Not guilty? Aye right! You should report it to the police and take it up with the court, m8. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 26 minutes ago, The DA said: Totally agree from the second paragraph onward. Impact-wise, 'not guilty' and 'not proven' are the same but the latter has always been taken to mean 'we think you did it but the prosecution didn't prove their case' or 'not guilty and don't do it again'. If he's not guilty, he didn't do it in the first place. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 3 minutes ago, Detournement said: Salmond believes that Sturgeon set him up according to multiple sources close to him. Again, who? And how do you know this? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark Connolly Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 1 hour ago, Alan Stubbs said: I’ve worked in a Ministerial Private Office (not FM’s) and found the consternation about Sturgeon saying she doesn’t deal with her emails amusing. Of course she doesn’t. I work in a normal office and found the idea of any senior manager dealing with their own emails hilarious. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thane of Cawdor Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 21 minutes ago, topcat(The most tip top) said: I was wondering whether there’s a joke I’ve missed or whether they can’t spell Heimlich Sensitive pronoun use. Typical of the gallantry on this site. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 18 minutes ago, BawWatchin said: Because you're just a seething, drooling mess in general. Ok. 8 minutes ago, welshbairn said: Again, who? And how do you know this? Sky news mentioned it earlier, whether it's true or not who knows. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 She doesn't campaign for independence. She doesn't talk about independence. Her closest political allies are unionists and one of her circle who was put forward as an SNP candidate for parliament described herself in court as a "lukewarm supporter of independence". Join the dots. She is happy managing Scotland within the UK.Oh H_B!![emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23][emoji23] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jim McLean's Ghost Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 Any "comeback" Alex Salmond thinks he is going to have is going to be derailed by his admitting of a "sleepy cuddle" even if it didn't rise to the level of criminality. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairn Necessities Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 Just now, Jim McLean's Ghost said: Any "comeback" Alex Salmond thinks he is going to have is going to be derailed by his admitting of a "sleepy cuddle" even if it didn't rise to the level of criminality. I think the taxi admission was worse. Thats creepy as f**k. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 15 minutes ago, Jacksgranda said: If he's not guilty, he didn't do it in the first place. But one of the charges was found to be 'not proven' rather than 'not guilty'. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detournement Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 Just now, Jim McLean's Ghost said: Any "comeback" Alex Salmond thinks he is going to have is going to be derailed by his admitting of a "sleepy cuddle" even if it didn't rise to the level of criminality. He doesn't need a proper comeback. He just needs to take the party away from Sturgeon and her cohort. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carpetmonster Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 1 minute ago, The DA said: But one of the charges was found to be 'not proven' rather than 'not guilty'. Which are, in law, exactly the same. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 It's hardly tinfoil. The Court of Session found that the Scottish government acted unlawfully towards Salmond. Salmond believes that Sturgeon set him up according to multiple sources close to him. There is a lot more to come in this.I generally rubber your drivel these days. My rule of thumb is that more than one line won't be worth reading and will be tinfoil hat shite. Sorry. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 5 minutes ago, The DA said: But one of the charges was found to be 'not proven' rather than 'not guilty'. You're the one who posted "not guilty and don't do it again". I'm saying if he's not guilty he didn't do it in the first place. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 3 minutes ago, carpetmonster said: Which are, in law, exactly the same. 'Not proven' has a stigma attached. Quote Impact-wise, 'not guilty' and 'not proven' are the same but the latter has always been taken to mean 'we think you did it but the prosecution didn't prove their case' or 'not guilty and don't do it again'. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 Just now, Jacksgranda said: You're the one who posted "not guilty and don't do it again". I'm saying if he's not guilty he didn't do it in the first place. It's a fucking legal joke. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carpetmonster Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 2 minutes ago, The DA said: 'Not proven' has a stigma attached. In the court of public opinion; which legally, does not matter worth a f**k. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacksgranda Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 1 minute ago, The DA said: It's a fucking legal joke. Lawyers must have a strange sense of humour. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Villa Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 1 hour ago, Hymlick Manouvre said: Can't you read properly 2 hours ago, Hymlick Manouvre said: Leeds Rhino's Oh dear. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The DA Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 1 minute ago, carpetmonster said: In the court of public opinion; which legally, does not matter worth a f**k. To a politician? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.