Jump to content
RadgerTheBadger

Nipper Salmond

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, John Lambies Doos said:
On 19/03/2020 at 23:00, Pet Jeden said:
What an unpleasant tit of a man (?) you are.

Ffs... What a woooooosh

Yep. I was whooshed. But if you think it's okay to call his wife "fat/auld/barren"  in order to make your "in" joke, then I think you are indeed an unpleasant tit of a man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Yep. I was whooshed. But if you think it's okay to call his wife "fat/auld/barren"  in order to make your "in" joke, then I think you are indeed an unpleasant tit of a man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Bairn Necessities said:

Two jurors dismissed this morning for undisclosed reasons. Down to 13 now. Improves the situation for Salmond 

Why so?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, welshbairn said:

Why so?

You still need 8 for a guilty verdict  so that now has to be 8 from13 not 8 from 15. The two who have been dismissed are by default voting for him 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 minutes ago, Bairn Necessities said:

You still need 8 for a guilty verdict  so that now has to be 8 from13 not 8 from 15. The two who have been dismissed are by default voting for him 

Maybe they were swaying the jury against conviction though, we can't know.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, welshbairn said:

Maybe they were swaying the jury against conviction though, we can't know.

I don't think this is 12 Angry Men. This is a massive boost to Salmond. 

Edited by Bairn Necessities

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Bairn Necessities said:

I don't think this is 12 Angry Men. This is a massive boost to Salmond. 

Haven't been on a jury myself but friends who have say some jurors can be very influential at directing the vote. It's of no use to Salmond whatsoever if they were intending to acquit.

Edited by welshbairn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

Haven't been on a jury myself but friends who have say some jurors can be very influential at directing the vote. It's of no use to Salmond whatsoever if they were intending to acquit.

True, though if you are a juror pushing to convict, and you are currently short of 8, you have a smaller pool of people to try and convince, which could make things harder.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Dele said:

Dangerous precedent. 

Nah, he was only ever First Minister. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

No surprise there, there was no way the nat friendly legal services were going to let one of their own down. If he had been a tory this place would have went into a meltdown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...