Jump to content

Nipper Salmond


RadgerTheBadger

Recommended Posts

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...
38 minutes ago, NewBornBairn said:

Did anyone get a read of the Neil Mckay article on Salmond in the Herald?

 

 

Looks like it's been pulled https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/18289812.neil-mackays-big-read-great-trials-century/

May have been pulled as the Bulger family were also not best pleased with it.

Image

Edited by dirty dingus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nick Robinson (R4) and Sarah Smith  really struggling to conceal the undisguised glee in their voices as they described and discussed the charges facing AS . Never before in the history of UK politics has any party leader, or first minister ever faced such serious criminal charges......the worst charges since records began, blah, blah and fucking blah.

Cont/ P94

 

 

Edited by ICTJohnboy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, ICTJohnboy said:

Nick Robinson (R4) and Sarah Smith  really struggling to conceal the undisguised glee in their voices as they described and discussed the charges facing AS . Never before in the history of UK politics has any party leader, or first minister ever faced such serious criminal charges......the worst charges since records began, blah, blah and fucking blah.

Cont/ P94

 

 

I agree with you re the journalists creating a shitstorm.

Edited by SandyCromarty
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ICTJohnboy said:

Nick Robinson (R4) and Sarah Smith  really struggling to conceal the undisguised glee in their voices as they described and discussed the charges facing AS . Never before in the history of UK politics has any party leader, or first minister ever faced such serious criminal charges......the worst charges since records began, blah, blah and fucking blah.

Cont/ P94

 

 

Sarah Smith sounded like she was getting off on the gory details, sure she was licking her lips.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 26/12/2019 at 11:09, Lee Van Tee said:

A couple of women I work next to have already made their minds up that he's guilty. They will always believe he's guilty because 'you can just imagine him behaving like that' and something to do with his wife being about 80. It's not even worth arguing that he deserves a fair trial and that people should keep an open mind.

Maybe TEN women being involved has helped people come to an early conclusion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, SouthLanarkshireWhite said:

Maybe TEN women being involved has helped people come to an early conclusion?

Maybe they've brought ten as cumulative force as none of them stand up to scrutiny on their own? Some of the accusations are pretty flimsy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, SouthLanarkshireWhite said:

Maybe TEN women being involved has helped people come to an early conclusion?

I'm merely mentioned the reasons why they think he must be guilty, which were because of his wife's age and the way he looks.

Sadly, people this stupid get to serve on jury duty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SouthLanarkshireWhite said:

Are you suggesting that the TEN are lying or just that it is TEN not very serious episodes?

No, just that I haven't come to a conclusion that he must be guilty because of the number of charges. Some of the accusations are very serious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...