BawWatchin Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 7 minutes ago, Sergeant Wilson said: I have, literally, run out of explanations. The thought of you, kuro or Wattoo on a jury or even voting is frightening. Why? Because we would dare to ask "where is the evidence"? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BawWatchin Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 7 minutes ago, Henderson to deliver ..... said: This was laughed off at the time, but we now know that this innocent looking tennis ball was in fact packed with deadly explosives. This was not Sergeant Wilson's first attempt to take the life of Scotland's First Minister , nor would it be his last ... Join me after the news at 10, as we take a look at THE WILSON FILES. Me and 9 other pals of mines are willing to testify to this in a court of law. We've already pieced our story together so know exactly what to say. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 2 minutes ago, BawWatchin said: Why? Because we would dare to ask "where is the evidence"? The Judge will do that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 The Judge will do that.But but but he’s an elite.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BawWatchin Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 minute ago, Sergeant Wilson said: The Judge will do that. But. There. Is. No. Evidence. Understand? The judge will be presented with words only. But because it's gone to a court case, he has the opportunity to throw the hammer down based on that alone. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mastermind Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Doesn’t matter because The Establishment will randomly draw a jury full of Rangers fans, Unionists, Tories etc etc 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BawWatchin Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 14 minutes ago, Mastermind said: Doesn’t matter because The Establishment will randomly draw a jury full of Rangers fans, Unionists, Tories etc etc Exactly my point. Money can achieve anything these days. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 29 minutes ago, BawWatchin said: But. There. Is. No. Evidence. Understand? The judge will be presented with words only. But because it's gone to a court case, he has the opportunity to throw the hammer down based on that alone. Bring in Sharia Law, in its strictest form there has to be four witnesses to a rape or illegal sexual conduct before its regarded as proven. That's evidence for you. Harvey Weinstein would love that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 40 minutes ago, BawWatchin said: But. There. Is. No. Evidence. Understand? The judge will be presented with words only. But because it's gone to a court case, he has the opportunity to throw the hammer down based on that alone. How would you address sexual assault cases? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BawWatchin Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 minute ago, Sergeant Wilson said: How would you address sexual assault cases? They would have to be brought forward sooner rather than later. DNA and forensics would need to be done, both on the victim and the accused, as well as the area where it's claimed to have happened. If claimed to have happened in a public place but no DNA/forensic evidence found, i'd be looking for possible security camera footage. As a judge, i'd be looking for at least some conclusive evidence that connects the victim with the accused. Not simply words from her and her pals. -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mastermind Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 They would have to be brought forward sooner rather than later. DNA and forensics would need to be done, both on the victim and the accused, as well as the area where it's claimed to have happened. If claimed to have happened in a public place but no DNA/forensic evidence found, i'd be looking for possible security camera footage. As a judge, i'd be looking for at least some conclusive evidence that connects the victim with the accused. Not simply words from her and her pals.[emoji23][emoji23][emoji23] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 minute ago, BawWatchin said: They would have to be brought forward sooner rather than later. DNA and forensics would need to be done, both on the victim and the accused, as well as the area where it's claimed to have happened. If claimed to have happened in a public place but no DNA/forensic evidence found, i'd be looking for possible security camera footage. As a judge, i'd be looking for at least some conclusive evidence that connects the victim with the accused. Not simply words from her and her pals. Nice one. Just remember lads, use a condom and don't leave it behind. And if you're just grabbing someone's arse, keep it out of the cameras even if her friends are watching, it be cool. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BawWatchin Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 10 minutes ago, welshbairn said: Nice one. Just remember lads, use a condom and don't leave it behind. And if you're just grabbing someone's arse, keep it out of the cameras even if her friends are watching, it be cool. and be sure to wear gloves so you don't leave any finger marks..... oh and shave your head so no hair follicles can be found on the clothes she was wearing...... better keep the mouth closed the whole time as well..... oh and be sure not to sneeze either..... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 (edited) 19 minutes ago, BawWatchin said: They would have to be brought forward sooner rather than later. DNA and forensics would need to be done, both on the victim and the accused, as well as the area where it's claimed to have happened. If claimed to have happened in a public place but no DNA/forensic evidence found, i'd be looking for possible security camera footage. As a judge, i'd be looking for at least some conclusive evidence that connects the victim with the accused. Not simply words from her and her pals. Mother of Suffering fùck! Edited November 21, 2019 by Sergeant Wilson 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 That’s wishful thinking of an incredibly high level.Not wishful thinking just what should happen (not what will happen). 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broomhill Ultra Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 They would have to be brought forward sooner rather than later. DNA and forensics would need to be done, both on the victim and the accused, as well as the area where it's claimed to have happened. If claimed to have happened in a public place but no DNA/forensic evidence found, i'd be looking for possible security camera footage. As a judge, i'd be looking for at least some conclusive evidence that connects the victim with the accused. Not simply words from her and her pals.A paedophile’s charter. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BawWatchin Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Just now, Broomhill Ultra said: A paedophile’s charter. Yeah, peadophiles would love to hear that DNA, forensics and footage would be used against them in court....... it's the mere words of a child that terrifies them the most. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 10 minutes ago, BawWatchin said: and be sure to wear gloves so you don't leave any finger marks..... oh and shave your head so no hair follicles can be found on the clothes she was wearing...... better keep the mouth closed the whole time as well..... oh and be sure not to sneeze either..... 1 minute ago, Broomhill Ultra said: A paedophile’s charter. @rape crisis @victim support 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 (edited) 2 minutes ago, BawWatchin said: Yeah, peadophiles would love to hear that DNA, forensics and footage would be used against them in court....... it's the mere words of a child that terrifies them the most. That wouldn't count going by your earlier posts. "Not simplywords" Edited November 21, 2019 by Sergeant Wilson 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BawWatchin Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 6 minutes ago, Sergeant Wilson said: That wouldn't count going by your earlier posts. "Not simplywords" Well yes, i've been saying from the very start that this court case is built on words alone. The "evidence" is the words of the women. Not anything of actual proof being provided. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.