Jump to content

Nipper Salmond


RadgerTheBadger

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, RadgerTheBadger said:

Why are you quoting @Al666

To give context to your reply obviously. You dribbling simpleton.

34 minutes ago, RadgerTheBadger said:

You’ve just made a massive c**t of yourself

 

1 hour ago, RadgerTheBadger said:

The irony

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...
1 hour ago, UsedToGoToCentralPark said:

Now we need to waste more money having an inquiry into this as well.

Add in the fees of the government as well and the figure of £500k is just a small part of the total bill.

Sturgeon should go.

Your arse. The senior civil servants in the Scottish Govt determined that this case should go forward. Sturgeon had to respect the decisions they were making. Can you imagine the outcry if she'd shut down an investigation into Alex Salmond against the express wishes and recommendations of Lesley Evans and her team?  Sturgeon would have been hounded by the media and opposition for years for getting her predecessor off the hook from that investigation. Whatever way this goes at trial, Sturgeon is on a hiding to nothing so she must steer the middle path as best she can. If you'd made the point that those who pushed for this path should consider their position them aye, fair enough. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, HTG said:

Your arse. The senior civil servants in the Scottish Govt determined that this case should go forward. Sturgeon had to respect the decisions they were making. Can you imagine the outcry if she'd shut down an investigation into Alex Salmond against the express wishes and recommendations of Lesley Evans and her team?  Sturgeon would have been hounded by the media and opposition for years for getting her predecessor off the hook from that investigation. Whatever way this goes at trial, Sturgeon is on a hiding to nothing so she must steer the middle path as best she can. If you'd made the point that those who pushed for this path should consider their position them aye, fair enough. 

Yet shes referred herself to the standards commission to investigate her several meeting with Alex Salmond whilst the complaints were being investigated and Salmonds legal team are saying the half a million could increase to £750,000 with unbilled costs still to be added on. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UsedToGoToCentralPark said:

Now we need to waste more money having an inquiry into this as well.

Add in the fees of the government as well and the figure of £500k is just a small part of the total bill.

Sturgeon should go.

Sturgeon should go for the expenses racked up by UK civil servants? Including their illegal handling of the case?

Bizarre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Malky3 said:

Yet shes referred herself to the standards commission to investigate her several meeting with Alex Salmond whilst the complaints were being investigated and Salmonds legal team are saying the half a million could increase to £750,000 with unbilled costs still to be added on. 

Who do you thinks running up the costs here?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Malky3 said:

Yet shes referred herself to the standards commission to investigate her several meeting with Alex Salmond whilst the complaints were being investigated and Salmonds legal team are saying the half a million could increase to £750,000 with unbilled costs still to be added on. 

What problem do you have with a self referral to the Standards Commission? Had she not referred herself then she'd have got pelters for lack of transparency. If the Standards Commission concludes that those meetings were relevant and appropriate, you'll not believe them anyway. If they conclude otherwise you'll be like a dog with 2 cocks.  

This is because you hate Sturgeon and what she stands for so whatever she does, no matter where she does it it or what it achieves, people like you will always start their next sentence with "but" or one of its close relations - just as you have here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, HTG said:

What problem do you have with a self referral to the Standards Commission? Had she not referred herself then she'd have got pelters for lack of transparency. If the Standards Commission concludes that those meetings were relevant and appropriate, you'll not believe them anyway. If they conclude otherwise you'll be like a dog with 2 cocks.  

This is because you hate Sturgeon and what she stands for so whatever she does, no matter where she does it it or what it achieves, people like you will always start their next sentence with "but" or one of its close relations - just as you have here. 

It's the classic Yoon stuff. They cannot defend getting dragged out of Europe or the 100k + deaths due to the tories so they play personality politics. I might have voted for Indy but that Salmond is fat/shifty/loudmouth etc...now it's Sturgeon she's nippy/barren/divisive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, UsedToGoToCentralPark said:
31 minutes ago, dirty dingus said:
It's the classic Yoon stuff. They cannot defend getting dragged out of Europe or the 100k + deaths due to the tories so they play personality politics. I might have voted for Indy but that Salmond is fat/shifty/loudmouth etc...now it's Sturgeon she's nippy/barren/divisive. 

Who's a Yoon?

I actually work with a guy called Yoon, I should try and get him into Scottish politics.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yet shes referred herself to the standards commission to investigate her several meeting with Alex Salmond whilst the complaints were being investigated and Salmonds legal team are saying the half a million could increase to £750,000 with unbilled costs still to be added on. 
Unionist not used to politician with principals.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Now we need to waste more money having an inquiry into this as well.

Add in the fees of the government as well and the figure of £500k is just a small part of the total bill.

Sturgeon should go.
Sturgeon didn't investigate Salmond, sport. All scottish civil servants are uk civil servants and (technically) agents of the Crown.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Baxter Parp said:
4 hours ago, Malky3 said:
Yet shes referred herself to the standards commission to investigate her several meeting with Alex Salmond whilst the complaints were being investigated and Salmonds legal team are saying the half a million could increase to £750,000 with unbilled costs still to be added on. 

Unionist not used to politician with principals.

Want to talk about stealing from food banks, fiddling trust funds and wife beating. Three high profile SNP politians all guilty. I'm never surprised to hear just how unprincipled power hungry politians are. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Want to talk about stealing from food banks, fiddling trust funds and wife beating. Three high profile SNP politians all guilty. I'm never surprised to hear just how unprincipled power hungry politians are. 
Gonna need a link to those three convictions in the history of the SNP, champ.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sturgeon has a mandate as First Minister and we will have to await the inquiry she promised- there is a fair backlog of inquiries building up- to find out if she behaved properly in her dealings relating to these complaints.

Evans could already be sacked going by the decision of the court of session. That she isn't on gardening leave stinks. The timing of Salmond's charges were extremely fortuitous for the pair of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...