Jump to content

Nipper Salmond


RadgerTheBadger

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Clockwork said:

Seems AS isn’t quite ready to let things go following his acquittal. A distraction NS could well do without at present.
https://inews.co.uk/news/scotland/snp-alex-salmond-claims-nicola-sturgeon-misled-the-scottish-parliament-multiple-times-823179

No one resigns these days so it doesn't matter.

And given that Nicola Sturgeon has banned us from socialising this is small beer now to the vast majority of people if it wasn't before.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

Biteback is owned by Ian Dale, a failed Conservative candidate who writes for the Conservative Home website, and Michael Ashcroft, a former Conservative party deputy chair 

Kieran Andrews is the Times Scotland Political editor. 

Davie Clegg has worked for the Courier and the Daily Record and has been linked previously to Liz Lloyd, who worked for Nicola Sturgeon.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...
13 minutes ago, lichtgilphead said:

Weren't you the one that didn't want the alleged perjury to be investigated at the time that it happened?

I don't remember that. As I remember it I said that it was possible for 2 people to recollect events from a few years ago differently with neither party lying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 15/05/2020 at 22:37, welshbairn said:

You're the one who wants to re-examine the evidence and put one of the witnesses under further scrutiny. I'd have thought it would be better to let it rest for all concerned. If you think you can prove a political conspiracy to damage the political prospects of Salmond, whatever he had left, then beaver away. But I think the witnesses should be left alone.

Whilst you did also say that 2 people could remember eveimage.gif.0889121eb01c9ba8ded3d4d18960c2c2.gifnts differently, you specifically said in a number of posts that witness H should be left alone (see above for one example)

I must admit, however, that I find it a bit odd that this has resurfaced now. Is there an election in the offing, or something?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

Anyone in the future who wants to make a sexual harassment complaint against a powerful boss will certainly think twice about it now, however this enquiry plays out. 

I've heard this argument before, but for me reaching a truthful conclusion should be the sole aim of any court case or process.

Whilst we should encourage women to come forward whenever they've been assaulted, we should also discourage them not to do so if it hasn't happened.

Salmond could have died in jail for things he didn't do.

Edited by Duries Air Freshener
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Duries Air Freshener said:

I've heard this argument before, but for me reaching a truthful conclusion should be the sole aim of any court case or process.

Whilst we should encourage women to come forward whenever they've been assaulted, we should also discourage them not to do so if it hasn't happened.

Salmond could have died in jail for things he didn't do.

Glad to see you taking such a principled stance in defence of an SNP legend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, lichtgilphead said:

Anyone in the future who wants to make up a bunch of lies about a politically retired ex-boss should certainly think twice about it now, however this enquiry plays out. 

Anyone thinking of just getting a bit cuddly with a staff member and apologising the next morning should think twice about it too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

Glad to see you taking such a principled stance in defence of an SNP legend.

Cheers, and I don't mind that all.. I pride myself in being balanced.

It'd be foolish to let ones political stance cloud their judgement on such matters.  Tribalism has a lot to answer for.

I don't particularly see it as a defence either,.. just a rational take on the situation.

Edited by Duries Air Freshener
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

Anyone thinking of just getting a bit cuddly with a staff member and apologising the next morning should think twice about it too.

Agreed, but that's not neccesarily a criminal offence. See HMA v Salmond.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Duries Air Freshener said:

Cheers, and I don't mind that all.. I pride myself in being balanced.

It'd be foolish to let ones political stance cloud their judgement on such matters.  Tribalism has a lot to answer for.

I don't particularly see it as a defence either,.. just a rational take on the situation.

You wouldn't have had any comment on this if you weren't hoping it might eventually reflect badly on Nicola Sturgeon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other very revealing part of this is that if perjury charges are brought it will definitely lead to a huge political scandal but numerous Scottish political journalists who know all the details already are on Twitter saying that there should be no perjury investigation!

Scotland is an incestous, corrupt place. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...