D Angelo Barksdale Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 That's some list. If he's guilty I hope he goes down and doesn't manage to wriggle out of jail time. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweeperDee Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Crown prosecutors literally throwing shite at the wall and hoping it sticks with that number of charges. It’s like police tactics 101, literally designed to scare the defendant into pleading guilty to SOMETHING. Hope he fights it all the way. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweeperDee Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Also WATTOO, you shouldn’t touch anyone without them giving prior indication and consent that that’s alright for you to do. Imagine going up to someone in a nightclub and brushing their hair away. [emoji23] 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 11 minutes ago, SweeperDee said: Also WATTOO, you shouldn’t touch anyone without them giving prior indication and consent that that’s alright for you to do. Imagine going up to someone in a nightclub and brushing their hair away. I was with them though !! (incidentally, I've never had any complaints about my hair touching or brushing aside, maybe next year) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 13 minutes ago, SweeperDee said: Also WATTOO, you shouldn’t touch anyone without them giving prior indication and consent that that’s alright for you to do. Imagine going up to someone in a nightclub and brushing their hair away. Even worse, imagine going up to someone and requesting their permission to speak to them !!! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gordon EF Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 To be fair, if all he was accused of was touching someone's hair or arm, he wouldn't be facing charges. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiG Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 (edited) Have a Charles for "sex walrus" Edited November 21, 2019 by RiG 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweeperDee Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Even worse, imagine going up to someone and requesting their permission to speak to them !!!I mean, that’s not what I said. By all means speak to people (they might not want to speak to you though, and customarily tell you to f**k off). Don’t be surprised if you end up getting a sore jaw cause you touch someone without their permission though. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Well excuse me I thought it was a free country but if it's come to not being able to strip naked and launch myself at a woman like some kind of sex walrus then I don't think I want to live in this country anymore.^^^ Next POTUS found. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 minute ago, SweeperDee said: I mean, that’s not what I said. By all means speak to people (they might not want to speak to you though, and customarily tell you to f**k off). Don’t be surprised if you end up getting a sore jaw cause you touch someone without their permission though. Well, it's never happened yet and I've never seen it happen to anyone in real life, not to mention that "getting a sore jaw" would be serious assault so we seem to be ok with violently punching someone but totally against tapping someone on the shoulder or moving their hair aside ?? Strange and just a tad hypocritical, don't you think ?? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sergeant Wilson Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 1 hour ago, Lex said: Those allegations Got to feel for his alleged victims. That's what got him in to this mess 50 minutes ago, WATTOO said: Seriously ? Have you never been clubbing ? Anyway, how the fcuck is moving someone's hair "sexual assault" ? The manner and context that it was done. Male in position of power imposing unwanted touching, maybe what he said will be relevant. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweeperDee Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Well, it's never happened yet and I've never seen it happen to anyone in real life, not to mention that "getting a sore jaw" would be serious assault so we seem to be ok with violently punching someone but totally against tapping someone on the shoulder or moving their hair aside ?? Strange and just a tad hypocritical, don't you think ??Officer: “So, what caused the lady to punch you in the face?”WATTOO: “Well I just went up to her and started speaking to her, I couldn’t hear her very well so I just put my hands toward her face and moved her hair, like the kind bloke that I am, nothing out of the ordinary officer” 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 6 minutes ago, SweeperDee said: Officer: “So, what caused the lady to punch you in the face?” WATTOO: “Well I just went up to her and started speaking to her, I couldn’t hear her very well so I just put my hands toward her face and moved her hair, like the kind bloke that I am, nothing out of the ordinary officer” Well Yes, that sounds perfectly normal to me. The fact that YOU find that strange gives me great cause for concern..................... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SweeperDee Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Well Yes, that sounds perfectly normal to me. The fact that YOU find that strange gives me great cause for concern.....................I’m going to leave it at that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuro Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 (edited) Most obvious stitch up job in history and very sad. This is what happens if you threaten the British establishment. They will protect paedophiles on their side but woe betide anyone who.threatens them. Craig Murray yes the sqme.one published an article months ago with quotes.from two women stating they were visited by the police and encouraged to make allegations. One of them talked about.He patted her arm at a reception something and the police repeatedly and aggressively tried to get her to.characterise it as sexual assault when she said it.was.nothing of the sort. Its as.obvious a stitch up as.Julian assange and for.the exact same reasons. Edited November 21, 2019 by Kuro 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kuro Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Of kissed her cheek maybe, anyway point he's as innocent as oswald like another poster said. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Broomhill Ultra Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Most obvious stitch up job in history and very sad. This is what happens if you threaten the British establishment. They will protect paedophiles on their side but woe betide anyone who.threatens them. Craig Murray yes the sqme.one published an article months ago with quotes.from two women shocking they were visited by the police and encouraged to make allegations. One of them talked about.He patted her arm at a receptionist something and the police repeatedly and aggressively tried to get her to.characterise it as sexual assault when she said it.was.nothing of the sort. Its as.obvious a stitch up as.Julian assange and for.the exact same reasons.You’ve convinced me. Free the Banffshire one [emoji110] 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICTChris Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 This is going to be a grim trial in so many ways, partly by what’s revealed in court and partly by the reaction to it as shown by this thread.Hopefully justice is done in the end. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz FFC Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Fully expect Unionists to claim Salmond is guilty as f**k regardless of how this goes. The women could break down and claim they made it all up and we will still read on FB how there is "no smoke without fire" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Van Tee Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 8 minutes ago, ICTChris said: This is going to be a grim trial in so many ways, partly by what’s revealed in court and partly by the reaction to it as shown by this thread. Hopefully justice is done in the end. Good to see somebody else just wants the truth to come out rather assuming Salmond is innocent/guilty purely down to their own political allegiances. It'll never really catch on though, will it? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.