welshbairn Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 6 minutes ago, Bairn Necessities said: You still need 8 for a guilty verdict so that now has to be 8 from13 not 8 from 15. The two who have been dismissed are by default voting for him Maybe they were swaying the jury against conviction though, we can't know. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairn Necessities Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 (edited) Just now, welshbairn said: Maybe they were swaying the jury against conviction though, we can't know. I don't think this is 12 Angry Men. This is a massive boost to Salmond. Edited March 23, 2020 by Bairn Necessities 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Bairn Necessities said: I don't think this is 12 Angry Men. This is a massive boost to Salmond. Haven't been on a jury myself but friends who have say some jurors can be very influential at directing the vote. It's of no use to Salmond whatsoever if they were intending to acquit. Edited March 23, 2020 by welshbairn 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
renton Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 43 minutes ago, welshbairn said: Haven't been on a jury myself but friends who have say some jurors can be very influential at directing the vote. It's of no use to Salmond whatsoever if they were intending to acquit. True, though if you are a juror pushing to convict, and you are currently short of 8, you have a smaller pool of people to try and convince, which could make things harder. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pet Jeden Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 1 hour ago, welshbairn said: Why so? Dry cough? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pet Jeden Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 Oooft 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derry Alli Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 Dangerous precedent. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inanimate Carbon Rod Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 Cant believe he got not guilty. Ffs. Always opt for trial by jury kids. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanius Mullarkey Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 Ooaft. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D.A.F.C Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 Touching up random women is legal.Okaaaaaay 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ayrmad Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 1 minute ago, Dele said: Dangerous precedent. Nah, he was only ever First Minister. 12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sophia Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 he walked from court a free man 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colkitto Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 Lad! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hymlick Manouvre Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 No surprise there, there was no way the nat friendly legal services were going to let one of their own down. If he had been a tory this place would have went into a meltdown. -9 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BawWatchin Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 Feels good man. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BawWatchin Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 3 minutes ago, D.A.F.C said: Touching up random women is legal. Okaaaaaay It's just harmless office banter m8. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pet Jeden Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 Nicola Sturgeon won't take this lying down. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lofarl Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 Weinstein will be kicking himself he never had his lawyer’s. I take it they never took his football leanings into account. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 Called it - acquitted on all charges.Still does not change my view that he is a pervy old b*****d. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BawWatchin Posted March 23, 2020 Share Posted March 23, 2020 Just now, DeeTillEhDeh said: Called it - acquitted on all charges. Still does not change my view that he is a pervy old b*****d. He is a pervy old b*****d. But being a pervy old b*****d isn't a crime. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.