Forest of Dean Posted August 8, 2018 Share Posted August 8, 2018 6 minutes ago, kingjoey said: I know that all Rangers fans will be revelling in this decision, but deep down they know, like the rest of us, that this is a pathetic outcome. They’ll never admit it, obviously. I think it's a decision that can go either way really. It is a kick out but doesn't really make contact. I'd bet that in most games most refs would only give a yellow for that. However I don't think a red is out of the question for it but neither is it blindingly obvious. Of course you'd be happy if your team's only fit striker had a 2 game suspension overturned. You'd be happy if Logan was available last weekend and this weekend right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pandarilla Posted August 8, 2018 Share Posted August 8, 2018 I think it's a decision that can go either way really. It is a kick out but doesn't really make contact. I'd bet that in most games most refs would only give a yellow for that. However I don't think a red is out of the question for it but neither is it blindingly obvious. Of course you'd be happy if your team's only fit striker had a 2 game suspension overturned. You'd be happy if Logan was available last weekend and this weekend right?On first viewing I thought the red was harsh. After seeing it a bit clearer I agreed with the analysis that it was a clear kick (rather than a flick). I'm absolutely amazed it's been rescinded. That's a really weird call. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desp Posted August 8, 2018 Share Posted August 8, 2018 Got to be honest and say I didn't think it was a red card offense. It's daft kick out, but it's not violent conduct. There's precedent from the review panel. Kipré got sent off for a daft kick out at Scott Brown last year and it was rescinded a few days later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanius Mullarkey Posted August 8, 2018 Share Posted August 8, 2018 1 minute ago, Desp said: Got to be honest and say I didn't think it was a red card offense. It's daft kick out, but it's not violent conduct. There's precedent from the review panel. Kipré got sent off for a daft kick out at Scott Brown last year and it was rescinded a few days later. And so continues the Motherwell/Sevco/SFA love triangle. Disgusting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodhull Posted August 8, 2018 Share Posted August 8, 2018 1 minute ago, Desp said: Got to be honest and say I didn't think it was a red card offense. It's daft kick out, but it's not violent conduct. There's precedent from the review panel. Kipré got sent off for a daft kick out at Scott Brown last year and it was rescinded a few days later. How do you non violently deliberatly kick someone? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dumpweed Posted August 8, 2018 Share Posted August 8, 2018 How can a kick/ violent conduct be downgraded? It's either a kick at someone or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted August 8, 2018 Share Posted August 8, 2018 It’s a kick out but not violent conduct [emoji1]Jesus f**k lads Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darren1872 Posted August 8, 2018 Share Posted August 8, 2018 He tried to make contact, but missed, just like he does with the ball 90% of the time. Guys a donkey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanius Mullarkey Posted August 8, 2018 Share Posted August 8, 2018 Have I missed the statement? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TrebleTwenty Posted August 8, 2018 Share Posted August 8, 2018 Expect more Sevco love in from the SFA as the season goes on. The more Sevco cry wolf, the more the SFA bend over. Sevco have put all the eggs in the basket this season to win the league.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jute Posted August 8, 2018 Share Posted August 8, 2018 Knew the red card would be rescinded as soon as they appealed. SFA are absolutely terrified of upsetting Sevco yet their moronic fans still think the SFA/entire world is against them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Desp Posted August 8, 2018 Share Posted August 8, 2018 If people honestly think that was violent conduct and a red card, then they should be shouting for half a dozen reds a game. How many times have we seen a player take someone out, violently kicking them, on the halfway line to stop a breakaway? Always a yellow, and nobody has a go about those kind of things. In this scenario, people can't see beyond the jersey he was wearing. Rangers were right to appeal it, and the decision to overturn it is absolutely correct. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NJ2 Posted August 8, 2018 Share Posted August 8, 2018 These decisions have been going against Rangers for years as well. Going to have to keep playing that huddy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rodhull Posted August 8, 2018 Share Posted August 8, 2018 4 minutes ago, Desp said: If people honestly think that was violent conduct and a red card, then they should be shouting for half a dozen reds a game. How many times have we seen a player take someone out, violently kicking them, on the halfway line to stop a breakaway? Always a yellow, and nobody has a go about those kind of things. Were these challenges off the ball? If not then it's not really the same is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EdTheDuck Posted August 8, 2018 Share Posted August 8, 2018 Just now, Desp said: If people honestly think that was violent conduct and a red card, then they should be shouting for half a dozen reds a game. How many times have we seen a player take someone out, violently kicking them, on the halfway line to stop a breakaway? Always a yellow, and nobody has a go about those kind of things. In this scenario, people can't see beyond the jersey he was wearing. Rangers were right to appeal it, and the decision to overturn it is absolutely correct. Hmm...never? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbornbairn Posted August 8, 2018 Share Posted August 8, 2018 14 minutes ago, Desp said: If people honestly think that was violent conduct and a red card, then they should be shouting for half a dozen reds a game. How many times have we seen a player take someone out, violently kicking them, on the halfway line to stop a breakaway? Always a yellow, and nobody has a go about those kind of things. In this scenario, people can't see beyond the jersey he was wearing. Rangers were right to appeal it, and the decision to overturn it is absolutely correct. bollocks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dons_1988 Posted August 8, 2018 Share Posted August 8, 2018 If people honestly think that was violent conduct and a red card, then they should be shouting for half a dozen reds a game. How many times have we seen a player take someone out, violently kicking them, on the halfway line to stop a breakaway? Always a yellow, and nobody has a go about those kind of things. In this scenario, people can't see beyond the jersey he was wearing. Rangers were right to appeal it, and the decision to overturn it is absolutely correct. Drivel Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted August 8, 2018 Share Posted August 8, 2018 Not sure about most of this... 17 minutes ago, Desp said: If people honestly think that was violent conduct and a red card, then they should be shouting for half a dozen reds a game. How many times have we seen a player take someone out, violently kicking them, on the halfway line to stop a breakaway? Always a yellow, and nobody has a go about those kind of things. In this scenario, people can't see beyond the jersey he was wearing. Rangers were right to appeal it, and the decision to overturn it is absolutely correct. ... But the final sentence is fair enough. Never a red card. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingjoey Posted August 8, 2018 Share Posted August 8, 2018 1 hour ago, Forest of Dean said: I think it's a decision that can go either way really. It is a kick out but doesn't really make contact. I'd bet that in most games most refs would only give a yellow for that. However I don't think a red is out of the question for it but neither is it blindingly obvious. Of course you'd be happy if your team's only fit striker had a 2 game suspension overturned. You'd be happy if Logan was available last weekend and this weekend right? If Logan played for Rangers or Celtic, he would have had his red card rescinded, and would have been available. But he doesn’t, so he wasn’t. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Forest of Dean Posted August 8, 2018 Share Posted August 8, 2018 1 minute ago, kingjoey said: If Logan played for Rangers or Celtic, he would have had his red card rescinded, and would have been available. But he doesn’t, so he wasn’t. Nice tin foil hat you've got there m8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.