scottsdad Posted December 22, 2022 Share Posted December 22, 2022 Time for some good old fashioned whataboutery Why is it ok to be vile and offensive if you're Left-wing? Jeremy Clarkson's Meghan column was plain nasty. But the backlash he's facing is infinitely harsher than the outcry over these repellent slurs, writes ROSS CLARK 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted December 22, 2022 Share Posted December 22, 2022 32 minutes ago, scottsdad said: Time for some good old fashioned whataboutery Why is it ok to be vile and offensive if you're Left-wing? Jeremy Clarkson's Meghan column was plain nasty. But the backlash he's facing is infinitely harsher than the outcry over these repellent slurs, writes ROSS CLARK Poor examples because there was a huge backlash over all of them, (apart from maybe Steve Bell's) and in most cases they were forced to apologise. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted December 22, 2022 Share Posted December 22, 2022 On 20/12/2022 at 13:54, williemillersmoustache said: Pretty much the perfect reply. Boy's proper losing it.. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williemillersmoustache Posted December 22, 2022 Share Posted December 22, 2022 4 minutes ago, welshbairn said: Boy's proper losing it.. Nah, this is just the inevitable circle of arsehole agitator on twitter closing. Say something cunty. Get called out. Accuse everyone calling you out of being obsessed. Repeat endlessly for attention. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
D Angelo Barksdale Posted December 23, 2022 Share Posted December 23, 2022 2 dead at a Kurdish Centre in Paris. Suspect believed to have previously attacked migrants with a sword. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherrif John Bunnell Posted December 24, 2022 Share Posted December 24, 2022 Guess who's not seeing his kids this Christmas 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miguel Sanchez Posted December 24, 2022 Share Posted December 24, 2022 10 minutes ago, Sherrif John Bunnell said: Guess who's not seeing his kids this Christmas How do you unwillingly rape someone? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFTD Posted December 24, 2022 Share Posted December 24, 2022 13 minutes ago, Miguel Sanchez said: How do you unwillingly rape someone? Lozza doesn't seem the type who'd have a ready supply of excuses for how a man could rape a woman without it being their fault. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bairnardo Posted December 24, 2022 Share Posted December 24, 2022 2 hours ago, Miguel Sanchez said: How do you unwillingly rape someone? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
effeffsee_the2nd Posted December 25, 2022 Share Posted December 25, 2022 (edited) On 20/12/2022 at 15:31, williemillersmoustache said: Convergence here of a topic on another thread. Is it worth ignoring obvious trolls? Or better to take their nonsense apart with wit, eloquence and an understanding of the subject matter the OP simply can only dream of. Again, I find the existence of these other bangers in the replies very challenging to my current approach. The correct answer is ignore. there is absolutely no point in trying to engage in a debate with an ignorant people, they are not interested in facts or other side. they are right, of story. if this takes place face to face then they will most likely just turn up the volume and increase the amount of swearing they use. you could tie then up in knots but they won't concede. weather deliberate or not they succeed in their aim by wearing down the willingness of their opponent to continue & also put others off having a go at the same time I once witnessed someone put across a very reasonable argument as to why leaving the EU would be possible but very difficult and costly at least in the short - medium term. the brexiteer simply responded with... FUCKIN SHITE! ABSOLUTE FUCKIN SHITE YA SLAVERIN c**t Edited December 25, 2022 by effeffsee_the2nd 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sherrif John Bunnell Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 Turn on your telly tonight to see the man the the woke lefties won't even allow on telly these days. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carpetmonster Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 13 minutes ago, Sherrif John Bunnell said: Turn on your telly tonight to see the man the the woke lefties won't even allow on telly these days. Hang on, surely they can’t all be buying this shi…. https://conservativehome.com/2022/12/27/our-survey-lee-anderson-is-backbencher-of-the-year/ oh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miguel Sanchez Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 37 minutes ago, Sherrif John Bunnell said: Turn on your telly tonight to see the man the the woke lefties won't even allow on telly these days. Uhhuh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salt n Vinegar Posted December 27, 2022 Share Posted December 27, 2022 For any Tories out there who regard Sunak's premiership as a bit boring, and long for the fun filled days of Bojo and Truss, they need not fret. Apparently if Sunak fails, none other than Jacob Rees-Mogg is prepared to chuck his top hat into the ring as the next Tory P.M. One of the born to rule cult. (No, CULT!) That'll help cement these rebellious Sots into the Union and no mistake! Rejoice! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted December 28, 2022 Share Posted December 28, 2022 20 hours ago, Sherrif John Bunnell said: Turn on your telly tonight to see the man the the woke lefties won't even allow on telly these days. The responses are hilarious: "Schroedinger's comedian: Simultaneously banned from TV and on TV." 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coprolite Posted December 28, 2022 Share Posted December 28, 2022 On 25/12/2022 at 11:14, effeffsee_the2nd said: The correct answer is ignore. there is absolutely no point in trying to engage in a debate with an ignorant people, they are not interested in facts or other side. they are right, of story. if this takes place face to face then they will most likely just turn up the volume and increase the amount of swearing they use. you could tie then up in knots but they won't concede. weather deliberate or not they succeed in their aim by wearing down the willingness of their opponent to continue & also put others off having a go at the same time I once witnessed someone put across a very reasonable argument as to why leaving the EU would be possible but very difficult and costly at least in the short - medium term. the brexiteer simply responded with... FUCKIN SHITE! ABSOLUTE FUCKIN SHITE YA SLAVERIN c**t I disagree. If someone is spouting superficially plausible shite and pretending to be reasonable i think a rebuttal is needed. I prefer either facts or a direct character assassination but i can see the attraction of a witty riposte or withering put down. No more than one or two posts (one factual, one "f**k off c**t") should suffice. What i think should be avoided is engaging in a point by point debate. Especially with new members on here who head directly to the politics forum to explain why Tommy Robinson is unfairly misunderstood. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
effeffsee_the2nd Posted December 28, 2022 Share Posted December 28, 2022 2 hours ago, coprolite said: I disagree. If someone is spouting superficially plausible shite and pretending to be reasonable i think a rebuttal is needed. I prefer either facts or a direct character assassination but i can see the attraction of a witty riposte or withering put down. No more than one or two posts (one factual, one "f**k off c**t") should suffice. What i think should be avoided is engaging in a point by point debate. Especially with new members on here who head directly to the politics forum to explain why Tommy Robinson is unfairly misunderstood. FUCKIN....SHITE! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted December 28, 2022 Share Posted December 28, 2022 4 hours ago, coprolite said: I disagree. If someone is spouting superficially plausible shite and pretending to be reasonable i think a rebuttal is needed. I prefer either facts or a direct character assassination but i can see the attraction of a witty riposte or withering put down. No more than one or two posts (one factual, one "f**k off c**t") should suffice. What i think should be avoided is engaging in a point by point debate. Especially with new members on here who head directly to the politics forum to explain why Tommy Robinson is unfairly misunderstood. Not sure you understand what a troll is. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coprolite Posted December 28, 2022 Share Posted December 28, 2022 15 minutes ago, Granny Danger said: Not sure you understand what a troll is. You want bile and ignorance spread without challenge, that's up to you. Other opinions are available. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fullerene Posted December 28, 2022 Share Posted December 28, 2022 If a troll appears on a thread, I might add to that thread without engaging with them directly or referencing them in anyway. If they respond to what I say, I go off to another thread and wait for them to get bored. That usually works. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.