Jump to content

What is the point of Labour ?


pawpar

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Clown Job said:

Is that meant to help convince Scot’s to vote for Labour or is that meant to appeal to English voters?

1A0DE9C8-5D2D-444B-8D59-7337A10593E9.jpeg

“Sure, you can push for a divisive referendum on whether or not to remain locked in Brexit Britain, or…”

EDA2E1DE-1828-4843-916E-FF291A2F7BBE.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chance for [mention=37891]WhiteRoseKillie[/mention] to meet a genuine working class hero!
Apart from the geographic clue in my username, the only chance of our paths crossing would be if he decided to attend Durham Miners Gala. Can't see it, tbh - he might catch Socialism.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

In this clip, the bold Jack Straw who last came to my notice, alongside Malcolm Rifkind, during the cash for access scandal, does his best to win over the wavering SNP vote 
 
The only guest speaker at over twenty years of POA conference that I ever walked out on. A vain, lying, cheating cűnt who personified the very worst of Blair's government.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would certainly help if Labour took this opportunity to actually put some policy proposals on the table, on say the economy. health and crime. This is their chance to make a 'big' offer, not in 2 years time. They could also be taking about how they will 'clean up' politics. All they are asking for at the moment is VAT to be scrapped on energy bills (albeit it should be)

Edited by Jedi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Jedi said:

Would certainly help if Labour took this opportunity to actually put some policy proposals on the table, on say the economy. health and crime. This is their chance to make a 'big' offer, not in 2 years time. They could also be taking about how they will 'clean up' politics. All they are asking for at the moment is VAT to be scrapped on energy bills (albeit it should be)

You can only think that they're waiting for the Tories to implode before risking advocating spending plans and policies that a percentage of focus groups might not like, and financial journalists might pick apart. It's what you get when you put a cautious lawyer in charge of a political party.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree...but think they need to really start outlining what they will do differently...big chance for them build momentum while Johnson stays on..they have to start controlling the narrative on policy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What is clear is that now Starmer has a chance to be "heard" by the electorate. Rolling out policies would be a good idea and allow him to seize the agenda. Johnson is planning to do a policy blitz soon - he gets it - and Starmer needs to get in first. 

"Green new deal" isn't enough. It was around when Corbyn was in charge but doesn't have the same impact with the public as crime/NHS/schools does. He needs something on one of these. Something substantial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those with long memories may remember John Smith as Labour leader. He took over after Kinnock's defeat to Major in 1992 and followed a cautious path immediately after the election- Starmer is reminiscent of that.

Major's government eventually got embroiled in sleaze and splits and Smith's untimely death meant that it was Blair who enjoyed electoral success. 

To my mind if Labour announced policies now then the mainly Tory supporting UK press would tear into them (or Boris nick them). I would guess there is a manifesto ready for a snap election in a locked safe somewhere but meanwhile as another election could be a few years away it's better to sit and watch Boris make an arse of things meanwhile. 

Oh, and Smith who was seen as a Labour centrist, if not slightly to the right of the party, would probably now be seen as some kind of dangerous left winger...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Clown Job said:

Winning the argument makes no difference if you can never be in power because of the way the system is set up 

Governments in Holyrood can be held to account

Looks like the dozy arsehole has scored a bit of an own goal there: claiming that independence from Westminster is a weak solution to Westminster arbitrarily doing bad things is … odd.

A bit like saying “ugh - imprisoning serial killers so they can’t stab people is weak. Locking people up is so lazy!”

Moron.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...