Jump to content

What is the point of Labour ?


pawpar

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, DeeTillEhDeh said:
56 minutes ago, Highland Capital said:
The Scottish Labour MEP David Martin became quite independence neutral in the last few years and I assume Henry McLeish is still a party member (will he ever finally come out for Yes?!).

I would not be surprised if someone like Dugdale or Findlay came out in favour of independence

I don't think Findlay will. He's really critical of his colleagues at Holyrood so I doubt he thinks there's enough radicalism or independent spirt for a leftward drive in an indy Scotland. I imagine part of the reason he's bowing out anaw is because he doesn't see the point of working inside either of the parliaments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

customary post to say if Scottish Labour supported Scotland's right to decide they'd be well on the way to my vote.   

We need a better choice or at least another social demoratic/socialist party that's not hung up in daft factions.  Age old problems though

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, tirso said:

customary post to say if Scottish Labour supported Scotland's right to decide they'd be well on the way to my vote.   

We need a better choice or at least another social demoratic/socialist party that's not hung up in daft factions.  Age old problems though

I believe we will get a new left of centre( socialist?) part once we get independence.  Labour in Scotland ( and the UK) are withering away painfully on the vine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just watched Angela Rayner on Breakfast show refusing to answer the question. She, rightly, criticised the Tory offer of 1% to Nurses but repeatedly waffled and refused to answer when asked what Labour would offer but instead kept up her rant about the Tory Offer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, oneteaminglasgow said:

Aye, because they only passed a budget for Scotland this week with the backing of the Greens and Lib Dems. There is a very obvious point that Labour will NEVER sign up to any SNP proposals but will on occasion sign up to TORY proposals. So, his definition of fighting for the Scottish people is somewhat coloured. In short, it's bollocks, he's a cock and his party is starting a purge of people who are soft on Indy. That'll work out well for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, NotThePars said:

Even the studiously neutral Sienna Rodgers is turning on Keir. What a disaster that man is.
 

No idea who she is but her attack there seems unfair and self absorbed.  Starmer is a squeaky disappointment though.  No doubt.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/03/2021 at 16:02, Highland Capital said:

Didn't Blair McDougall expect Henry McLeish to endorse Yes at one point?  Seem to remember something like that a couple of months before the vote but in the end he never did.

McLeish was fairly apathetic about the whole thing and any comment positivity on anything no relatd, he kept on giving a very soft no vibe and tearing into Westminster. McDougall just gave some ridiculously unsubtle hints that he heard McLeish was in support of 'Yes' so the press again questioned him on it and he reiterated his position of being opposed to independence. This then solidified him into the no campaign publicly and printed the headlines he wanted which helped in a pretty weak news cycle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, tirso said:

No idea who she is but her attack there seems unfair and self absorbed.  Starmer is a squeaky disappointment though.  No doubt.

 

She's the editor for Labour List and has spent the last year pretty much just reporting directly on Labour news. If even she's attacking Kier's messaging then he's not doing well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Elric said:

Just watched Angela Rayner on Breakfast show refusing to answer the question. She, rightly, criticised the Tory offer of 1% to Nurses but repeatedly waffled and refused to answer when asked what Labour would offer but instead kept up her rant about the Tory Offer. 

That's because Labours proposal is something equally pathetic like 2.1%.

Basically, it's exactly what the Tory voters in the focus groups say it should be and not a penny more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, G51 said:

That's because Labours proposal is something equally pathetic like 2.1%.

Basically, it's exactly what the Tory voters in the focus groups say it should be and not a penny more.

It's even more dumb because you can expect the Tories to cave on this with a higher amount than Labour offered and once again the Tories win the day. Cons 43% (+5)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's because Labours proposal is something equally pathetic like 2.1%.
Basically, it's exactly what the Tory voters in the focus groups say it should be and not a penny more.
Except Labour don't have a proposal - the 2.1% is what the Tories had already promised and budgeted for. Labour have said that is the minimum they should get, and a starting point for negotiation - which I think is fair.
Did you expect Rayner to deliver an entire budget on the hoof? Her party would have vastly different spending priorities to the Tories, so spending on Public Sector wages could be paid for by cutting back on nonsense like HS2, for example. Oh, sorry, that would be the Labour party before she helped stab Corbyn in the back - you know, the one that offered a genuine alternative to the cűnts in power.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s actually quite amusing to watch SLAB implode from the party that dominated Scotland for decades. They’ve continually doubled down on “Union at all costs” when unlike the Tories their membership are split on independence. Every election they get destroyed as the hardcore Unionists vote goes to the Tories while they keep pushing their own Yes voters or open to Yes voters away. They honestly seem to believe that if they help block IndyRef2 everyone will just forget about independence and everything will go back to how it was with Labour ruling Scotland. Membership around 16,000 they probably used to get that in Glasgow alone. With Sarwar and Starmer now calling the shots while wrapped in Union Jacks I just can’t see anyway they’ll ever recover. They’re so out of touch it’s shocking.

Popcorn?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, NotThePars said:

It's even more dumb because you can expect the Tories to cave on this with a higher amount than Labour offered and once again the Tories win the day. Cons 43% (+5)

 

excuse me how did you know this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...