Dan Steele Posted January 8, 2023 Share Posted January 8, 2023 4 minutes ago, White Thunder said: It is a derogatory term for someones skin colour therefore racist. But when they're not a raging, blustering mess sending their blood pressure through the roof, they'll not be gammon coloured, so is calling them gammon just temporary racist? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Steele Posted January 8, 2023 Share Posted January 8, 2023 3 minutes ago, White Thunder said: It is racist full stop. Imagine if you used a derogatory term to describe a black person's skin colour. This place would be in melt down. Blimey, you're angry. I hope your face isn't turning red. Ooops. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coprolite Posted January 8, 2023 Share Posted January 8, 2023 13 minutes ago, White Thunder said: It is racist full stop. Imagine if you used a derogatory term to describe a black person's skin colour. This place would be in melt down. I thought you gammony types objected to it being ageist as well? Apparently we're not allowed to call you c**t or just tell you to f**k off any more so i won't do that. I would be delighted to enter into good faith discussions with you, so long as you can accept the following axioms: Increased representation of women and minorities on the BBC is a good thing. Wind power is great. Meghan Markle is a good addition to the royal family. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Suspect Device Posted January 8, 2023 Share Posted January 8, 2023 2 minutes ago, coprolite said: I thought you gammony types objected to it being ageist as well? Apparently we're not allowed to call you c**t or just tell you to f**k off any more so i won't do that. I would be delighted to enter into good faith discussions with you, so long as you can accept the following axioms: Increased representation of women and minorities on the BBC is a good thing. Wind power is great. Meghan Markle is a good addition to the royal family. Even I wouldn't accept those 'axioms'. Wind power is only a good addition to other sources. There is no such thing as no good addition to the royal family since it should have been binned a long time ago. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coprolite Posted January 8, 2023 Share Posted January 8, 2023 3 minutes ago, Suspect Device said: Even I wouldn't accept those 'axioms'. Wind power is only a good addition to other sources. There is no such thing as no good addition to the royal family since it should have been binned a long time ago. But i'm not trying to give you an aneurysm 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo Posted January 8, 2023 Share Posted January 8, 2023 (edited) I’ll take a beef with black bean sauce, fried rice and prawn crackers. Send it to Jesus, care of the Pentagon. ETA: Edited January 8, 2023 by Joey Jo Jo Junior Shabadoo 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjamin_Nevis Posted January 8, 2023 Share Posted January 8, 2023 Has this White Thunder loser been binned already? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salt n Vinegar Posted January 8, 2023 Share Posted January 8, 2023 2 hours ago, Benjamin_Nevis said: Has this White Thunder loser been binned already? It's ok, I'm sure that there'll be another one along in a minute. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirkieRR Posted January 8, 2023 Share Posted January 8, 2023 If only buses were like trolls 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carpetmonster Posted January 8, 2023 Share Posted January 8, 2023 4 hours ago, Suspect Device said: Even I wouldn't accept those 'axioms'. Wind power is only a good addition to other sources. There is no such thing as no good addition to the royal family since it should have been binned a long time ago. As far as ‘wid’ additions go, she’s the best possibly ever. Certainly more so than Mike Tindall. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carpetmonster Posted January 8, 2023 Share Posted January 8, 2023 17 minutes ago, KirkieRR said: If only buses were like trolls In this case it’d be one bus with 10 numbers, so probably less useful than you’d reckon. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted January 10, 2023 Share Posted January 10, 2023 A small indication how far right Starmer is taking Labour. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tory-quit-labour-claire-perry-starmer-b2259000.html 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottsdad Posted January 10, 2023 Share Posted January 10, 2023 12 minutes ago, Granny Danger said: A small indication how far right Starmer is taking Labour. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tory-quit-labour-claire-perry-starmer-b2259000.html Nah, this always happens ahead of an election when there is a clearly forecast winner. Loads of Tories went to Labour in the mid-90s; loads went back the other way ahead of 2010, and since. Some folk just want to be with the winning team. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clown Job Posted January 10, 2023 Share Posted January 10, 2023 The state of this 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scottsdad Posted January 10, 2023 Share Posted January 10, 2023 20 minutes ago, Clown Job said: The state of this Scexit? Jeezo 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted January 10, 2023 Share Posted January 10, 2023 1 hour ago, Clown Job said: The state of this Shouldn’t that article read “Labour peer, former MSP and habitual drunk”? Just for accuracy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Granny Danger Posted January 10, 2023 Share Posted January 10, 2023 1 hour ago, scottsdad said: Nah, this always happens ahead of an election when there is a clearly forecast winner. Loads of Tories went to Labour in the mid-90s; loads went back the other way ahead of 2010, and since. Some folk just want to be with the winning team. It might often/always happen but there are many Tories who would be very comfortable in Starmer’s Labour Party. Let’s see if you can figure out why. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KirkieRR Posted January 10, 2023 Share Posted January 10, 2023 I hope there are still some Labour types whose contempt for the Express is matched by their contempt for the has-been Foulkes. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StellarHibee Posted January 10, 2023 Share Posted January 10, 2023 1 minute ago, KirkieRR said: I hope there are still some Labour types whose contempt for the Express is matched by their contempt for the has-been Foulkes. The Labour voters left in Scotland don't even have any contempt for the tories anymore which they're quite happy to switch between. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MazzyStar Posted January 12, 2023 Share Posted January 12, 2023 Labour centrists. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.