Jump to content

What is the point of Labour ?


pawpar

Recommended Posts

Just now, O'Kelly Isley III said:

The London centric media obsessing with Barnet, Wandsworth and Westminster councils, the last time I looked the Lib Dems were up 176 to Lanbour's +48.  If I were in Labour HQ I'd hold the champers for now.

Westminster and Wandsworth!

Starmer has proved he can win in the North and South (of London)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dianne Abbot saying she doesn’t think Starmer will be fined but if he is he should “consider his position”.

She’s wrong.  If he’s fined and does not successfully appeal it he should resign; no consideration required.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Labour shooting itself in the face for no apparent reason, again, now underway.
 
 
To which Bozo will laugh and quip don't let the door hit you on the arse on your way out as he carries on regardless. There is no moral high ground when it comes to an uber c**t like Johnson.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Billy Jean King said:
2 hours ago, williemillersmoustache said:
Labour shooting itself in the face for no apparent reason, again, now underway.
 
 

To which Bozo will laugh and quip don't let the door hit you on the arse on your way out as he carries on regardless. There is no moral high ground when it comes to an uber c**t like Johnson.

This is pretty much Labour’s (latest) miscalculation. They’re desperately trying to set up Starmer as the reasonable, honest, honourable politician  in contrast to Johnson and his government’s lying, corrupt charlatans. It’s a non-starter precisely because Johnson is a lying, corrupt charlatan - why would he give a shit? His supporters have always known what he is and not cared/rewarded him for it.

Starmer can’t gain anything from winning a more positive reputation than Johnson when Johnson has never had a good one (and has found that being a rogue has only enhanced his public persona amongst the people who hold the keys to No 10).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Antlion said:

This is pretty much Labour’s (latest) miscalculation. They’re desperately trying to set up Starmer as the reasonable, honest, honourable politician  in contrast to Johnson and his government’s lying, corrupt charlatans. It’s a non-starter precisely because Johnson is a lying, corrupt charlatan - why would he give a shit? His supporters have always known what he is and not cared/rewarded him for it.

Starmer can’t gain anything from winning a more positive reputation than Johnson when Johnson has never had a good one (and has found that being a rogue has only enhanced his public persona amongst the people who hold the keys to No 10).

I'll say this. It is politically brave, bold and principled of him if he does commit to resigning should he be fined. But I don't think it's going to work. 

All set for the optimum Tory and hilarious outcome of Starmer commiting political seppuku while BawJaws blunders on unscathed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, williemillersmoustache said:

Tough one with so much talent around. Looking at Streeting, Nandy, Burgon, or maybe get an ex MP in via the Lords, like Hugh Gaffney.

Maybe give Ed Miliband another chance.  If Mark McGhee deserves a job then so does Ed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...