Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • Div

      Pie and Bovril Nostalgia Mobile Phone Cases!   12/09/18

      We are delighted to have partnered up with Nostalgia Cases to offer a huge range of fantastic Scottish Football phone cases to our visitors. These high quality cases are available in a range of retro and up to date designs and there variations available for all Premiership, Championship and League 1 clubs as well as four of the League 2 teams. Within each club there are a range of choices. You'll find it difficult to choose! This is an Edinburgh based start-up, and they also provide a custom design service so if there is a kit you don't see that you'd love for your phone you can get in touch with them and they'll add it to their range. Naturally there is a HUGE support for all the major phone manufacturers and models and what's more delivery in the UK is completely FREE. What's even better is that Pie and Bovril users can get 10% off their order using the coupon code PIEANDBOV Take a look and browse the full range for your favourite club by clicking through to the website below. https://bit.ly/2M5laZs
Burntonian

Craigmark Burntonians 18/19

Recommended Posts

Highlights of the game against Glencairn

 

Think it shows quite clearly ours was a penalty. Yours probably. Still don’t see the touch but can see why given and the free kick is still a conundrum. Good footage though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, VORman said:


Think it shows quite clearly ours was a penalty. Yours probably. Still don’t see the touch but can see why given and the free kick is still a conundrum. Good footage though.

Both penalties in my opinion.   Third goal looked a free kick to Craigmark

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I wasn't at the game, so I can only view from Gerry's video.

At the debated free kick, it looked to me like the referee was playing advantage for what he deemed to be a foul on Ryan McArdle, as he stopped the game when he got in the way and gave a foul to Glencairn about 10 yards away where the ball had originally come from.

Glencairn's penalty is a penalty. No debate for me. Craigmark's non-penalty looked like it probably could/should have been given, although the player looks like he wants to go down before the tug by Jay McKay.

If the referee has shown two yellow cards to a Craigmark player and not produced a red card, as has been alleged, then that balances out the non-award of a penalty to Craigmark.

As has been pointed out above, the game ended 5-1 with the Craigmark goalie making several fine saves.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The game finished 5-1, debating a free kick or a penalty is clutching at straws.

Just you worry about your team Spanks. Playing 60 minutes against 10 men and loosing 3-1. No wonder your were sacked from the club.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The game finished 5-1, debating a free kick or a penalty is clutching at straws.

You’ve totally misread the thread. Was about a ref not a result.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Just you worry about your team Spanks. Playing 60 minutes against 10 men and loosing 3-1. No wonder your were sacked from the club.


The young lad took you guys to places you will never see or achieve again. A bit of respect where it's due...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I wasn't at the game, so I can only view from Gerry's video.

At the debated free kick, it looked to me like the referee was playing advantage for what he deemed to be a foul on Ryan McArdle, as he stopped the game when he got in the way and gave a foul to Glencairn about 10 yards away where the ball had originally come from.

Glencairn's penalty is a penalty. No debate for me. Craigmark's non-penalty looked like it probably could/should have been given, although the player looks like he wants to go down before the tug by Jay McKay.

If the referee has shown two yellow cards to a Craigmark player and not produced a red card, as has been alleged, then that balances out the non-award of a penalty to Craigmark.

As has been pointed out above, the game ended 5-1 with the Craigmark goalie making several fine saves.

Again the thread was started about the ref not the result. But a fair appraisal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
51 minutes ago, glensmad said:

I wasn't at the game, so I can only view from Gerry's video.

At the debated free kick, it looked to me like the referee was playing advantage for what he deemed to be a foul on Ryan McArdle, as he stopped the game when he got in the way and gave a foul to Glencairn about 10 yards away where the ball had originally come from.

Glencairn's penalty is a penalty. No debate for me. Craigmark's non-penalty looked like it probably could/should have been given, although the player looks like he wants to go down before the tug by Jay McKay.

If the referee has shown two yellow cards to a Craigmark player and not produced a red card, as has been alleged, then that balances out the non-award of a penalty to Craigmark.

As has been pointed out above, the game ended 5-1 with the Craigmark goalie making several fine saves.

I may be wrong but I have always believed that penalties awarded when teams are tied can alter the course of the game. Glens were the best team and deserved to win however if the penalty had been given then who knows

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I may be wrong but I have always believed that penalties awarded when teams are tied can alter the course of the game. Glens were the best team and deserved to win however if the penalty had been given then who knows
Fair point. My first instinct on watching it from the camera angle was that the Craigmark player was already on his way to the ground before McKay tugged his arm. Perhaps that was the referee's view as well, and he doesn't get to watch a slow-motion replay like we do. I wouldn't have complained much if it had been given, though. The other penalty claim that wasn't given at the other end (the challenge on McKay) isn't too clear on the video.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


The young lad took you guys to places you will never see or achieve again. A bit of respect where it's due...

Respect!!!! He was applying for jobs while here. And that’s why he was sacked. Ask the players who the REAL manager last season was. I understand your backing your manager. But what he says to your face and what he says behind your back are 2 different things.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


The young lad took you guys to places you will never see or achieve again. A bit of respect where it's due...

Your comment lacks respect to craigmark!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Respect!!!! He was applying for jobs while here. And that’s why he was sacked. Ask the players who the REAL manager last season was. I understand your backing your manager. But what he says to your face and what he says behind your back are 2 different things.


Nothing to do with girvan.

So, if we are to believe the story above and let's say another individual was to be congratulated for the success, why did you keep hold of spank the full season if he was useless??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

You called him “useless” not me. But it is a accurate description of his abilities.
I don’t know why he was kept for the season. He didn’t take training and when he got involved in team talks it was like Saturday at the comedy club.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You called him “useless” not me. But it is a accurate description of his abilities.
I don’t know why he was kept for the season. He didn’t take training and when he got involved in team talks it was like Saturday at the comedy club.


So given you were privy to team talks you must either be a player who played under him or one of the coaching staff??

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


So given you were privy to team talks you must either be a player who played under him or one of the coaching staff??

Yes I was privy to his David Brent specials.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

IMG_3810.jpg

I’ve managed to get a clip of spanks half time team talk from Saturday. It was all coming flooding back to me.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
IMG_3810.jpg.0d2259682086c2bf049689f7c7094804.jpg

I’ve managed to get a clip of spanks half time team talk from Saturday. It was all coming flooding back to me.


Pretty embarrassing that you seem to be the spokesperson for Craigmark...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


Pretty embarrassing that you seem to be the spokesperson for Craigmark...


I’m the spokesperson for myself. all I’m doing is echoing the thoughts of the dressing room.
I have 1st hand experience of him being totally inept. Your the embarrassment coming on and defending him. He’s a joke figure. He’s still phoning players and they’re laughing at it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×