Jump to content

Mexico v Scotland Sun 3rd June 2018


Enigma

Recommended Posts

Where has this idea that McLeish is a negative old dinosaur come from?

He was an attack-minded coach in his early manager jobs, particularly at Hibs. When he took the Scotland job the first time he took a team that had been somewhat effective but very defensive under Walter Smith, but made them a bit more expansive. The 3-1 v Ukraine was the best performance (in an attacking sense) that I have ever seen from a Scotland team, and I'm 36 years old!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 621
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Matt Ritchie plays for a team in the top half of the Premier League. James Forrest plays for a team in the 26th best league in Europe. There's a reason for that.

I get the point that if most of the premier league teams want Armstrong, Forrest or Griffiths they simply buy them as they have the finances and give the players a chance to play on a much higher level.

However when the Celtic players came in the last campaign there was a marked improvement in performances. Armstrong especially added something to the midfield that was missing the first half of the campaign. Scotlands international record in competitive matches when Armstrong has played has been played 4 won 3 drawn 1. (Against England)He’s only been in a losing team once in 6 internationals and that was when he came on as a 58 min sub against Costa Rica.

Having 4 or 5 players from same team also seemed to help in terms of understanding etc. Rogers also has his players on another fitness level to the likes of Snodgrass Ritchie Patterson etc.

I’m not a fan of the formation against Costa Rica preferred strachans 4-2-3-1.

I would play 4-2-3-1

Gordon

Tierney
Mckenna
Mulgrew
Robertson


Armstrong
mctominay

Fraser
Mcgregor
Phillips

Griffiths

If we were 3 at

Gordon

Mulgrew
Mckenna
Tierney
Robertson
Fraser

Forrest
Armstrong
Mctominay
McGregor

Griffiths

Link to comment
Share on other sites

                                                                                                           Gordon
                   Hendry                           McKenna                                                    Mulgrew                    Tierney
                                     McGregor                                     McTominey                                   Robertson
                                     Forrest                                                Griffiths                     Armstrong     

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JamesM82 said:

McLeish had basically the right idea in March, 3-4-2-1 with Robertson and Forrest as wing backs. It also negates the lack of a right back. I'm assuming he went 4-5-1 in these two games because he was trying to avoid an absolute pumping.

Gordon

McKenna - Mulgrew - Tierney

Forrest - McTominay - McGeouch - Robertson

Armstrong - McGregor

Griffiths

I'd go with that but would drop McGeouch for someone a bit more dynamic. MacDonald was crap against Costa Rica but was one of Fulham's best players last year. If he's performing in the top flight he's worth another go. Mcarthur is another decent option in there. I'm easy over Forrest vs Fraser. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

12 minutes ago, Marshmallo said:

I'd go with that but would drop McGeouch for someone a bit more dynamic. MacDonald was crap against Costa Rica but was one of Fulham's best players last year. If he's performing in the top flight he's worth another go. Mcarthur is another decent option in there. I'm easy over Forrest vs Fraser. 

This is about right. What I'm wary of is forcing a square peg (attacking midfielder) into a round hole (defensive midfielder). 

Regarding Forrest / Fraser, I feel that Forrest is the safer pick. Fraser would be more of an impact substitute, someone to go on if we need a goal with 25-30 to go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, EdiBairn said:

The idea of picking Dylan McGeouch over guys playing every week in the EPL is utter lunacy. 

How far does this go?  Do you think that every single one of the 220 players who start in the English Premier League every weekend are better than the 264 who start in the English Championship?  Does every player in a promoted team suddenly become better as soon as they go up, and every player in a relegated team get worse?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How far does this go?  Do you think that every single one of the 220 players who start in the English Premier League every weekend are better than the 264 who start in the English Championship?  Does every player in a promoted team suddenly become better as soon as they go up, and every player in a relegated team get worse?


I wonder if he would go as far as Charlie Adam and Darren Fletcher starting over Armstrong and McGregor?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Dullard Bluteau said:

75% failure rate for McLeish now. His only excuses seem to be " it wasn't a heavy defeat". That's a great comfort to the fans, no doubt. Did the idiots who selected him really expect anything other than failure ?

Michael O'Neill won one out of his first 18 games in charge of N. Ireland.

Let's see how the games that really matter go...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, John Lambies Doos said:

Nor are Uruguay and they have won it twice. 3 million is it?? Of course no play stations, Xboxes or ash pitches there

 

Iceland are an even better current example.  There are instances all through history of small countries punching above their weight, even we've done it (more so in club football).

Maintaining that over a lengthy period is more of a challenge.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bring back Phil Bardsley.

You know something mate???
That's an excellent shout!!![emoji1]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, craigkillie said:

How far does this go?  Do you think that every single one of the 220 players who start in the English Premier League every weekend are better than the 264 who start in the English Championship?  Does every player in a promoted team suddenly become better as soon as they go up, and every player in a relegated team get worse?

Obviously not every single player in the EPL will be better than those in the Premiership but with a few exceptions, the vast majority are. Most Championship players are also better.

It's not just about ability- it's about the level they're playing at. Guys used to playing against Agüero and Hazard are going to be much more used to the standards required than if they're playing against Connor Sammon and Andy Halliday.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Obviously not every single player in the EPL will be better than those in the Premiership but with a few exceptions, the vast majority are. Most Championship players are also better.
It's not just about ability- it's about the level they're playing at. Guys used to playing against Agüero and Hazard are going to be much more used to the standards required than if they're playing against Connor Sammon and Andy Halliday.


You’ve already showed how clueless you are with your proposed team mate. Just leave it there eh.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Lurkst said:

Michael O'Neill won one out of his first 18 games in charge of N. Ireland.

Let's see how the games that really matter go...

I get what you are saying, but surely every match Scotland play matters ? Every defeat plunges us further down the ratings.  McLeish is a very bad appointment, he did not deserve to be employed by our country again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Bob Mahelp
5 hours ago, C. Muir said:

In the last 2 years aswell Celtic have faced PSG, Bayern Munich, Man City and Barcelona in europe. Outwith top seeds (who we'd be expected to lose to anyway), any country that we've faced in qualifying in the last few years are nowhere near the level of they 4 sides. So to argue McGregor, Armstrong et al shouldn't be in the squad cause they lost a couple of games to opposition of that standard is strange. 

 

 

 

 

I wasn't saying that they shouldn't be in the squad, they're obviously the best we've got.

I was simply taking issue with the simplified reasoning that because some players play against other, better players, that somehow makes them always better players themselves.

Actually, a fairly decent example is Leigh Griffiths. 95% of his time in a Scotland shirt he's looked like a fish out of water, and his club manager rarely trusts him to start in European games.

But apparently he's the best we've got and we should be building a team around him. Doh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't saying that they shouldn't be in the squad, they're obviously the best we've got.
I was simply taking issue with the simplified reasoning that because some players play against other, better players, that somehow makes them always better players themselves.
Actually, a fairly decent example is Leigh Griffiths. 95% of his time in a Scotland shirt he's looked like a fish out of water, and his club manager rarely trusts him to start in European games.
But apparently he's the best we've got and we should be building a team around him. Doh.


That last paragraph.

Doh

There’s no apparently about it. He’s head and shoulders above any other striker we have
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...