Jump to content

Minimum Alcohol Pricing


scottsdad

Recommended Posts

On 20/08/2021 at 12:23, Suspect Device said:

Could be a blip but more likely the price increase has only had a short term effect?

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/08/25/women-began-drinking-high-risk-levels-lockdown/amp/

Women began drinking at ‘high-risk’ levels during lockdown
652,000 young adults took up smoking, and the number of men drinking at a high-risk level rose by 31 per cent

It's the lockdown effect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Minimum alcohol pricing in Scotland had 'minimal impact' on crime - BBC News

And surprise surprise they want it raised. I guess that if they raise it enough then it might just have an effect. Whether that effect will be the one they're hoping for is another question altogether.

65p is the next target. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Minimum alcohol pricing in Scotland had 'minimal impact' on crime - BBC News
And surprise surprise they want it raised. I guess that if they raise it enough then it might just have an effect. Whether that effect will be the one they're hoping for is another question altogether.
65p is the next target. 
Policy not intended to reduce crime had "minimal impact on crime", shock.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Suspect Device said:

Minimum alcohol pricing in Scotland had 'minimal impact' on crime - BBC News

And surprise surprise they want it raised. I guess that if they raise it enough then it might just have an effect. Whether that effect will be the one they're hoping for is another question altogether.

65p is the next target. 

Unless I’m missing something I always thought it was about health not crime?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely it would be an additional benefit of people drinking less?

 

The main reason would have been to improve health but crime is also a result of our relationship with alcohol?

 

I would think that it would have been under social harms of alcohol.

 

Quote

The evaluation programme seeks to answer two questions:

  • has minimum unit pricing contributed to reducing the health and social harms related to alcohol?

 

Edited by Suspect Device
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alcohol deaths at record levels. No reduction in crime. 
This is supposedly a success?
The rise in alcohol deaths in 2020 is surely as a result of lockdown, they were on the way down before that. As for crime it's sole purpose was as a public health measure. Any result in crime would simply be a bonus.
The fact the likes of Spoons still has beer at about £2 a pint suggests it not exactly onerous. Probably need to rise the minimum unit price in a more targeted way.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Billy Jean King said:

The rise in alcohol deaths in 2020 is surely as a result of lockdown, they were on the way down before that. As for crime it's sole purpose was as a public health measure. Any result in crime would simply be a bonus.
The fact the likes of Spoons still has beer at about £2 a pint suggests it not exactly onerous. Probably need to rise the minimum unit price in a more targeted way.

Yip can't have poor people enjoying a pint. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, scottsdad said:

Alcohol deaths at record levels. No reduction in crime. 

This is supposedly a success?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-57293223

Minimum unit alcohol price has 'lasting impact'

https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/one-in-three-adults-drank-more-alcohol-during-first-lockdown

One in three adults drank more alcohol during first lockdown

Guess which ones?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Detournement said:

The issue with minimum pricing is that it's only targeted at low income people despite problem drinking being society wide. 

 

 

Targeting rich people by increasing prices ?

Rich people can afford the price increase so that will not stop them from being dead before they should be dead from alcohol abuse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Detournement said:

Yip can't have poor people enjoying a pint. 

 

1 hour ago, Detournement said:

The issue with minimum pricing is that it's only targeted at low income people despite problem drinking being society wide. 

 

As if you give a shiny shite about poor people.

Away and play with your tin foil.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s good to see we are back to the old argument of “Alchies will always find a way to drink”.  The point of minimum pricing was not to catch those already addicted, but to discourage those who aren’t yet, and help reduce the chances of them become addicted.  It is one of those rare policies where the main benefits are in 20 years time, not today.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 19/08/2021 at 19:28, Baxter Parp said:

Why did alcohol deaths go down in the previous year then?

"The number of alcohol-specific deaths has decreased by 10%, from 1,136 in 2018 to 1,020 in 2019,"

https://www.nrscotland.gov.uk/news/2020/alcohol-deaths-decrease

A reduction of 0.3 deaths per day is not exactly a roaring success, especially when coupled with increased drug related deaths.

Great example of confirmation bias.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Wee Bully said:

It’s good to see we are back to the old argument of “Alchies will always find a way to drink”.  The point of minimum pricing was not to catch those already addicted, but to discourage those who aren’t yet, and help reduce the chances of them become addicted.  It is one of those rare policies where the main benefits are in 20 years time, not today.

😂

The "wait two weeks" of the MUP world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont really get that point that the price of alcohol is the deterrent to becoming addicted to it, education and less poverty must be the 2 biggest drivers.

maybe im wrong but putting prices up so people who cant afford a drink cant enjoy one seems a bit class based if thats really their argument for doing it

Edited by BigDoddyKane
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Todd_is_God said:

😂

The "wait two weeks" of the MUP world.

Or, actually quite a brave policy for politicians who normally want / need an instant hit. 
 

It’s part of a suite of things aimed at reducing the harms from alcohol. Another one is education - nobody is suggesting education is going to change a jakies mind or behaviour. MUP is the same. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...