Jump to content

The Ultimate Super Ayr Thread


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Trogdor said:

5cd0746141908_giphy(2).gif.06c6a115849f284fdfdacdeaebfed086.gif

He has a point tbf he's on the bench, surely he'd have been a better option than Hewitt, a completely right sided player in LB, could have put Roscoe LB and shuffled everyone over for Houston at RB

Edited by rb123!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, rb123! said:

He has a point tbf he's on the bench, surely he'd have been a better option than Hewitt, a completely right sided player in LB, could have put Roscoe LB and shuffled everyone over for Houston at RB

I'm guessing that the plastic shite has had a part in this decision 🙁

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2-0 HT completely flattering and undeserved on Hamilton, literally been in the box twice and scored twice.

Meanwhile we've been nowhere near clinical enough, going to be something special in the 2nd half if we can even get a draw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jazzar said:

I'm guessing that the plastic shite has had a part in this decision 🙁

Maybe... I think Houston will actually come on.

I just think they felt he couldn't do 70 mins. Meaning bringing on Hewitt but then they are maybe worried about subbing a sub (as that wouldn't be great for Hewitt) for Houston later.

I could be totally wrong with that but the only logic I can see in playing Hewitt at left back is so he wouldn't have to switch to left back when Houston comes on at right back later?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, dumpweed said:

Chambers is certainly a downgrade on harvie.

 

What's the deal with Houston? Is he not fit? Think he has a future

Chalmers?  He's playing centre mid :lol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Trogdor said:

Maybe... I think Houston will actually come on.

I just think they felt he couldn't do 70 mins. Meaning bringing on Hewitt but then they are maybe worried about subbing a sub (as that wouldn't be great for Hewitt) for Houston later.

I could be totally wrong with that but the only logic I can see in playing Hewitt at left back is so he wouldn't have to switch to left back when Houston comes on at right back later?

He came on to finish the game at left back through the week. 

Houston on for Roscoe please. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...