Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
Scott-Replay

The Clyde FC 2018-19 Thread

Recommended Posts

Two have offered to resign and had their resignations rejected. 
if you have any dignity you simply walk these characters will hang on with their finger nails to a seat on the board as said this is the second time in 3 years

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Bully Wee Villa said:

Two have offered to resign and had their resignations rejected. 

Usually in a player registration foul up, it's the club secretary who carries the can.

He /she is responsible for such matters.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Pie Of The Month said:

I think the punishment is probably the correct one but Clyde would have a reasonable point if they were to question why Hearts were only deducted 2 points in the league cup group sections earlier in the season for fielding an ineligible player.

The points deduction is based on the fact we won the first and drew the second game the player was involved in.. The points are basically just being recinded and the match results are 3-0 wins for the opposition. 

Edited by Karpaty Lviv

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Pie Of The Month said:

I think the punishment is probably the correct one but Clyde would have a reasonable point if they were to question why Hearts were only deducted 2 points in the league cup group sections earlier in the season for fielding an ineligible player.

Just looked at that. As well as the two point deduction, Hearts were fined & 10k. We have had £1,500 off (of which all but £500 is suspended) so maybe we chose to have an extra point off rather than a larger fine? Total guesswork, though. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I think the punishment is probably the correct one but Clyde would have a reasonable point if they were to question why Hearts were only deducted 2 points in the league cup group sections earlier in the season for fielding an ineligible player.
we have previous Ross Millen ( I think) three years ago couldn't make it up

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Karpaty Lviv said:

The points deduction is based on the fact we won the first and drew the second games. The points are basically just being recinded and the match results are 3-0 wins for the opposition. 

Hearts won the game they played an ineligible player in and were deducted 2 points rather than the full 3 though. Might be a different offence of course but I just found the difference in punishment strange.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Karpaty Lviv said:

The points deduction is based on the fact we won the first and drew the second games. The points are basically just being recinded and the match results are 3-0 wins for the opposition. 

Yes but Hearts won the game in question so, by the same logic, should have lost three points not two. 

Also, their opponents, Cove Rangers, should have been awarded three points but weren't. 

Odd. 

Edited by Bully Wee Villa

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, cfcuk said:
9 minutes ago, Bully Wee Villa said:
Two have offered to resign and had their resignations rejected. 

if you have any dignity you simply walk these characters will hang on with their finger nails to a seat on the board as said this is the second time in 3 years

What part of offered to resign don't you understand?

Their fellow Directors rejected their resignation. 

David Dishon took full and sole responsibility for the f**k up 3 years ago, offered to resign and his resignation was rejected. It would be hypocritical for him now as Chairman to insist someone else resigns.

Continue to back the manager and continue to back the Chairman and his decisions and we'll still get promoted. Keep the faith.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I did wonder about the hearts 2 point deduction, it meant they just managed to get through their betfred Cup group as opposed to being knocked out. Don’t know the ins and outs but seems strange to give more of a punishment to one than the other. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, bullyweehutch said:

Whoever is responsible has just cost us a league title. Angry doesn't even describe how I feel right now. f**k off Clyde

:lol:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What part of offered to resign don't you understand?
Their fellow Directors rejected their resignation. 
David Dishon took full and sole responsibility for the f**k up 3 years ago, offered to resign and his resignation was rejected. It would be hypocritical for him now as Chairman to insist someone else resigns.
Continue to back the manager and continue to back the Chairman and his decisions and we'll still get promoted. Keep the faith.
That's ok then say hello to your pals on board

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What’s the betting we win and both Peterhead and Edinburgh drop points today.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
What. a total embarrassment! Whoever is responsible should be sacked
oh dear Fat Sally will be after you, they are doing a great job don't you know

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...