Bring Your Own Socks Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 The story about the "first working day" seems a bit flawed. This from the SPFL site, posted on a Saturday. The day after the original hearing. I'd like to think the Clyde board is putting up a fight here. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Replays Posted April 15, 2019 Author Share Posted April 15, 2019 http://m.clydefc.co.uk/news/2019/04/15/6068/ Appeal chucked out, as expected really. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowden Cowboy Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 appeal unsuccessful 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the_bully_wee Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FREDDYFRY Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 Ach well, just have to do it the hard way☹️ 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
scot-gcar709 Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 Not really a surprise. It does now set a precedent so that I fully expect any other team who fields ineligible player should face the exact same punishment. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DutchBorderer Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 Oh well, our time in the SPFL was fun but all good things come to an end. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLClyde Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 Hearts field ineligible player during a win - 2 points deducted, nothing to other team. We do it - points deducted, 3-0 win to other team. Consistent. 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sammyreidloyal Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 Shameful 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HibeeJibee Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 For next season it needs codified in the rules what the punishment should be - whether that be 3pts deduction or 3-0 awards. You can't have each panel potentially deciding on 3pt deduction, replay, "keep it alive" deduction (e.g. Hearts = 2pts), or 3-0 awards, willy-nilly. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Officer Barbrady Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 Hmmmm The boardroom on Saturday will be a jolly plave to be, huh fellas? Now, for more hoping and wishing that we make a c**t of it from inside our own barracks than ever before. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David W Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 1 minute ago, SLClyde said: Hearts field ineligible player during a win - 2 points deducted, nothing to other team. We do it - points deducted, 3-0 win to other team. Consistent. The Hearts incident was a disgrace. This isn't. Now hopefully those resignations have been revisited. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Clyde FC Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 Forget them...we know, everyone knows who was the most consistent team in L2 this year. Who knows, we might get some referee decisions now rather than sending offs, denied penalties and fake yellows We're The Bullly Wee 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bring Your Own Socks Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 There's still time lads. It's Jum McInally you're up against.. Never say never, 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cowden Cowboy Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 7 minutes ago, SLClyde said: Hearts field ineligible player during a win - 2 points deducted, nothing to other team. We do it - points deducted, 3-0 win to other team. Consistent. yes - different competition with only 4 games to decide placings not 36 thus different approach is readily understandable 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Officer Barbrady Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 1 minute ago, Bring Your Own Socks said: There's still time lads. It's Jum McInally you're up against.. Never say never, Aye nae bother. I'm sure QP will be utterly committed in their 'play up' spirit on the 4th- nearly as bad as Elgin will be this week. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bully Wee Clyde FC Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 (edited) The decision on the Elgin matchday floored us...I hope and feel this might spur us on. The dressing room, the bench, the backroom and the support...I wouldn't want to take on any of us. Edited April 15, 2019 by Bully Wee Clyde FC 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clyde01 Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 yes - different competition with only 4 games to decide placings not 36 thus different approach is readily understandableThat’s complete shite. The punishment for the same offence should be consistent. Doesn’t matter how many games it’s over. The only reason the outcome was different is hearts would have kicked up a massive fuss if they got papped out the cup over it. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shawfielder Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 Never expected anything else, this is when we have to realise we are not such a big team. Both in making the mistake ( very amateurish ) and the penalty awarded. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLClyde Posted April 15, 2019 Share Posted April 15, 2019 1 minute ago, Cowden Cowboy said: yes - different competition with only 4 games to decide placings not 36 thus different approach is readily understandable No it isn’t. You can’t just pick and choose when you hand out full punishment and when you don’t. I didn’t expect the appeal to be successful but regardless the point stands on this. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.0f22cbd69b64158ca718c66b4e426366.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.