Jump to content
  • Announcements

    • Div

      Pie and Bovril Nostalgia Mobile Phone Cases!   12/09/18

      We are delighted to have partnered up with Nostalgia Cases to offer a huge range of fantastic Scottish Football phone cases to our visitors. These high quality cases are available in a range of retro and up to date designs and there variations available for all Premiership, Championship and League 1 clubs as well as four of the League 2 teams. Within each club there are a range of choices. You'll find it difficult to choose! This is an Edinburgh based start-up, and they also provide a custom design service so if there is a kit you don't see that you'd love for your phone you can get in touch with them and they'll add it to their range. Naturally there is a HUGE support for all the major phone manufacturers and models and what's more delivery in the UK is completely FREE. What's even better is that Pie and Bovril users can get 10% off their order using the coupon code PIEANDBOV Take a look and browse the full range for your favourite club by clicking through to the website below. https://bit.ly/2M5laZs
Sign in to follow this  
Peppino Impastato

Absolute shocker

Recommended Posts

Politicians lying.....shut up, never happened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Reads to me like Porton Down are saying they can't establish the source and never would have been able to, that their evidence needs triangulated with other evidence to establish the origin.

Of course you will have the two sides of the coin equally unable to understand this. The BoJos who see evidence as absolute confirmation and those who see lack of absolute confirmation as a rebuttal of the theory of Russian origin.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, invergowrie arab said:

Reads to me like Porton Down are saying they can't establish the source and never would have been able to, that their evidence needs triangulated with other evidence to establish the origin.

Of course you will have the two sides of the coin equally unable to understand this. The BoJos who see evidence as absolute confirmation and those who see lack of absolute confirmation as a rebuttal of the theory of Russian origin.

Uh huh. The crucial point being they said porton down had confirmed it is russian.  'categorically'.  Now porton down say that's not possible.  Our government have been lying in an attempt to Lin the blame on Russia.

The natural reaction of anyone with a quarter of a brain should be to ask why.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Nobody believes a word Boris says, not even himself. Porton Down said weeks ago that they could only confirm that it was a nerve agent of a type developed by Russia, not where that particular sample was made.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Peppino Impastato said:

About matters of this importance it's a rather big deal actually champ.

You really are a fucking grade a bampot.

eta champ...

Edited by Romeo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

Nobody believes a word Boris says, not even himself. Porton Down said weeks ago that they could only confirm that it was a nerve agent of a type developed by Russia, not where that particular sample was made.

No the British government said that.  It is also developed by the UK, USA and France.  Probably others too.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Peppino Impastato said:

No the British government said that.  It is also developed by the UK, USA and France.  Probably others too.

How do you know?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, welshbairn said:

Putin has been given the power to order the assassination of "those slandering the individual occupying the post of president of the Russian Federation".

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6188658.stm

Is the slant the BBC puts on something the UK has been doing for a hundred years you mean. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Peppino Impastato said:

Is the slant the BBC puts on something the UK has been doing for a hundred years you mean. 

It's a black and white law, it's not open to interpretation. Who has been assassinated merely for badmouthing the Queen or Prime Minister in the last hundred years?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, welshbairn said:

It's a black and white law, it's not open to interpretation. Who has been assassinated merely for badmouthing the Queen or Prime Minister in the last hundred years?

We'll never know...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

It's a black and white law, it's not open to interpretation. Who has been assassinated merely for badmouthing the Queen or Prime Minister in the last hundred years?

Maybe there's a white Fiat Panda in the Russian equivalent of Porton Down.... 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, welshbairn said:

It's a black and white law, it's not open to interpretation. Who has been assassinated merely for badmouthing the Queen or Prime Minister in the last hundred years?

You've got me there.

Can I think of anyone who has had anything bad to say about Margaret Thatcher, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, David Cameron or Theresa May?
Not sure I can think of anyone.

.. and as for the idea that anyone has ever had anything bad to say about the Queen - utterly ridiculous.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, welshbairn said:

It's a black and white law, it's not open to interpretation. Who has been assassinated merely for badmouthing the Queen or Prime Minister in the last hundred years?

Do you speak Russian?  Of course it's open to interpretation. 

The UK has been extra judicially killing people it considers a threat to both national security and it's economic interests, including democratically elected leaders, for at least a hundred years. Just cause the language is more obtuse (and you'd think you'd have learned by now the BBC is hardly an objective source) makes no difference.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×