Jump to content

BBC bias


Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...

The headline on the BBC website about Corbyn suggesting that we shouldn’t blame Iran for the sinking of two tankers in the Gulf of Oman without proof is “Corbyn branded ‘pathetic’ over Iran comments”.

What a shocking headline from the state owned broadcaster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Granny Danger said:

The headline on the BBC website about Corbyn suggesting that we shouldn’t blame Iran for the sinking of two tankers in the Gulf of Oman without proof is “Corbyn branded ‘pathetic’ over Iran comments”.

What a shocking headline from the state owned broadcaster.

 

This is the headline I'm seeing on their website :

"Jeremy Hunt brands Labour leader 'pathetic' over Iran comments"

I'm inclined to agree with him (Hunt)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The headline on the BBC website about Corbyn suggesting that we shouldn’t blame Iran for the sinking of two tankers in the Gulf of Oman without proof is “Corbyn branded ‘pathetic’ over Iran comments”.
What a shocking headline from the state owned broadcaster.
I believe it was Hunt that used the term pathetic, not the BBC...they only reported it. Nothing really in that one..
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ICTJohnboy said:

 

This is the headline I'm seeing on their website :

"Jeremy Hunt brands Labour leader 'pathetic' over Iran comments"

I'm inclined to agree with him (Hunt)

Jeremy Corbyn is saying that we shouldn’t blame anyone until there’s reasonable proof.  You disagree with that.

No wonder the country is fucked up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, John Lambies Doos said:

I believe it was Hunt that used the term pathetic, not the BBC...they only reported it. Nothing really in that one..

An equally valid and less prejudicial headline would be “Corbyn says let’s not blame Iran for Gulf of Oman tanker sinking without proof”.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

An equally valid and less prejudicial headline would be “Corbyn says let’s not blame Iran for Gulf of Oman tanker sinking without proof”.
 
Fair enough. Just a stronger headline when the foreign secretary calls the leader of opposition pathetic I guess. BBC had a headline last week quoting sturgeon calling the conservative leadership contest abhorrent.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Granny Danger said:

Jeremy Corbyn is saying that we shouldn’t blame anyone until there’s reasonable proof.  You disagree with that.

No wonder the country is fucked up.

 

So it's my fault the country is fucked up?

I suspect Corbyn has got this one wrong, just as he did with the Salisbury poisoning case. Did you agree with his stance on that one?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ICTJohnboy said:

 

So it's my fault the country is fucked up?

I suspect Corbyn has got this one wrong, just as he did with the Salisbury poisoning case. Did you agree with his stance on that one?

He didn't get the Sailisbury poisoning case wrong though did he? Because he never claimed to know who did it. He simply called for evidence to be presented before jumping the bandwagon, as any sensible person would.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, BawWatchin said:

He didn't get the Sailisbury poisoning case wrong though did he? Because he never claimed to know who did it. He simply called for evidence to be presented before jumping the bandwagon, as any sensible person would.

 

He got completely wrong. He refused to accept or believe that Russia had anything to do with it.

The man's a complete arsehole - no wonder the country is fucked up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Iran.

Another terrorist Regime that Jezza supports.

And in the past has been paid by them.

As Cilla said, surprise surprise.

Edited by sureiknow
Because some bed wetters wet themselves with glee seeing a spelling mistake!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ICTJohnboy said:

He got completely wrong. He refused to accept or believe that Russia had anything to do with it.

The man's a complete arsehole - no wonder the country is fucked up.

No he never. He asked for conclusive evidence to be provided before jumping to any assumptions.

I'm no fan of Corbyn. But you're talking utter baws here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sureiknow said:

Iran.

Another terririst Regime that Jezza supports.

And in the past has been paid by them.

As Cilla said, surprise surprise.

 

Cilla's dead.

She was probably poisoned by far left extremists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, sureiknow said:

Iran.

Another terririst Regime that Jezza supports.

And in the past has been paid by them.

As Cilla said, surprise surprise.

Funny how all of these "terrorist regimes" have one thing in common.

Iran (4th largest oil reserve in the world)

Iraq (5th largest oil reserve in the world)

Lybia (9th largest oil reserve in the world)

Venezuela (Largest oil reserve in the world)

Funny.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BawWatchin said:

No he never. He asked for conclusive evidence to be provided before jumping to any assumptions.

I'm no fan of Corbyn. But you're talking utter baws here.

 

There was conclusive evidence as to who was behind these poisonings.

Corbyn got it wrong - completely wrong. Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong.

I know it's difficult but try and get your head round that.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ICTJohnboy said:

There was conclusive evidence as to who was behind these poisonings.

Corbyn got it wrong - completely wrong. Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong.

I know it's difficult but try and get your head round that.

 

Not sure if you're at the wind up or not. But i'll assume you are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ICTJohnboy said:

 

There was conclusive evidence as to who was behind these poisonings.

Corbyn got it wrong - completely wrong. Wrong wrong wrong wrong wrong.

I know it's difficult but try and get your head round that.

 

Can you please point me to a credible link as to the guilty party in the Salisbury cases? By 'credible', I don't mean the main stream media, I'm looking for someone reliable outlining evidence, rather than supposition.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...