Bring Back Paddy Flannery Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 Struggling to work out what that is tbh. 352 is the only thing that makes sense there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
optimistic Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 Smith dowie Hill dick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
son hawk Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 3 at the back with wing backs? Can’t see how they players can fit our usual system of 4-2-3-1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bring Back Paddy Flannery Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 3 at the back with wing backs? Can’t see how they players can fit our usual system of 4-2-3-1 Back 4 of Smith, Dowie, Barr and Dick? Smith dowie Hill dick If we're playing with a central midfield of Barr, Carswell and Hutton I'd be hugely surprised. That would be horribly defensive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Moonster Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 2 minutes ago, Boghead ranter said: Back 4 of Smith, Dowie, Barr and Dick? Where is Hill playing then? I think it's a back 3 of Dowie, Barr and Hill with Smith and Dick as wing backs. Carswell, Hutton and Walsh as the midfield 3 and Russell and Nisbitt up front. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lionel wickson Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 Maybe we're matching up with Livi's formation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boghead ranter Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 My bad - missed Hill's name in the lineup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jan Vojáček Posted January 27, 2018 Author Share Posted January 27, 2018 That looks like a 3-5-2. Fair play to Stevie, I said he needed to try something different. Wasn't expecting that though. The SeaGal dropped after scoring a double. Confirmation that Stevie is BBPF imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bring Back Paddy Flannery Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 That looks like a 3-5-2. Fair play to Stevie, I said he needed to try something different. Wasn't expecting that though. The SeaGal dropped after scoring a double. Confirmation that Stevie is BBPF imo. To be fair I just said to Moonster he persists with him all season when he's contributing nothing then drops him days after he scores a brace.Not that I'm complaining but I do fear how Dick and Smith will cope at wing back. McLaughlin and Wardrop wouldn't worry me as much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boghead ranter Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 When your working and having to listen to Open All Mics, and BBC Scotland have allocated your game ......... Chick Young Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boghead ranter Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 'Sake. Lithgow, 1-0 Livi. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bring Back Paddy Flannery Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 Another goal conceded from a set piece. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jan Vojáček Posted January 27, 2018 Author Share Posted January 27, 2018 Honest to God I've never seen a team so unable to defend dead balls. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jan Vojáček Posted January 27, 2018 Author Share Posted January 27, 2018 Ayr or Raith in the playoffs then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bring Back Paddy Flannery Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 I assume the 352 will be binned at half time?7 defensive players on the park and we're 2-0 down after 30 mins. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pleslie99 Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 Honest to God I've never seen a team so unable to defend dead balls. It will come from lack of confidence in our goalkeeper. He needs to command his area and come clear everything in front of him which he doesn't do. This just invites every free kick/corner/long throw to be dropped inside our 6 yard box. If I was the opposing manager that's exactly what I would be doing. Our defenders can't win every high ball but they get no help from the man behind them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lorenzo71 Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 3-5-2 no need.Would put c gall on for hill and move to a back 4. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jan Vojáček Posted January 27, 2018 Author Share Posted January 27, 2018 33 minutes ago, Bring Back Paddy Flannery said: I assume the 352 will be binned at half time? 7 defensive players on the park and we're 2-0 down after 30 mins. Ironically it's not actually too bad going forward, but we've got nothing on the wings (Dick and Smith aren't going to run at a man) and the the second goal was a horrible mix up between Dill, Scott Gal and the wind. 25 minutes ago, pleslie99 said: 40 minutes ago, Sonsteam of 08 said: Honest to God I've never seen a team so unable to defend dead balls. It will come from lack of confidence in our goalkeeper. He needs to command his area and come clear everything in front of him which he doesn't do. This just invites every free kick/corner/long throw to be dropped inside our 6 yard box. If I was the opposing manager that's exactly what I would be doing. Our defenders can't win every high ball but they get no help from the man behind them. I agree he has to take a share of the blame, but guys like Dowie and Mango should be making sure nobody is free. I can deal with a few lapses, but we gift the opposition a goal (or more) every single week. At any level that's criminal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pleslie99 Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 I agree he has to take a share of the blame, but guys lol Dowie and Mango should be making sure nobody is free. I can deal with a few lapses, but we gift the opposition a goal (or more) every single week. At any level that's criminal. Yes I agree they do need to take blame. But if you have a GK that u know is going to come and claim anything near him you concentrate on your man and your man alone. As soon as 1 player (especially the keeper) casts doubt on their ability to win the ball then everyone else starts to worry about other players rather than their 1 designated opponent. If gallagher comes and wipes everything in front of him, team mates and all, then the issue would be sorted (probably). If your not going to come and claim high balls you shouldn't be a keeper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bring Back Paddy Flannery Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 Yes I agree they do need to take blame. But if you have a GK that u know is going to come and claim anything near him you concentrate on your man and your man alone. As soon as 1 player (especially the keeper) casts doubt on their ability to win the ball then everyone else starts to worry about other players rather than their 1 designated opponent. If gallagher comes and wipes everything in front of him, team mates and all, then the issue would be sorted (probably). If your not going to come and claim high balls you shouldn't be a keeper. The defence have to take a huge portion of the blame. It's wildly unfair to simply blame Gallagher. Our defenders are fuckin woeful at defending set pieces. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.