Jump to content

What's the most "Tin Pot" thing you've seen in the SPFL


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said:

Tbf it's hard to argue they wouldn't be in physical threat when your "ultra" section is leaving "all *****s are targets" messages all over the country.

 

8 minutes ago, Leith Green said:

You are better than that Heart and Hand type answer imo................

So it’s your belief that Lennon and Sutton sitting inside a studio in Ibrox were likely to come into harms way as opposed to this being a reason for Rangers to play hardball with media/pundits?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AJF said:

 

So it’s your belief that Lennon and Sutton sitting inside a studio in Ibrox were likely to come into harms way as opposed to this being a reason for Rangers to play hardball with media/pundits?

In the past month your fans have organised a black jacket march through a city, started putting threatening messages all over the city, and have started speaking about the "war" they're in online. It feels like it's escalating towards something that causes everyone to realise its gone too far, so why wouldn't it be some completely fanny trying to get into the studio section? There's absolutely someone in your support who thinks that's a good idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RandomGuy. said:

In the past month your fans have organised a black jacket march through a city, started putting threatening messages all over the city, and have started speaking about the "war" they're in online. It feels like it's escalating towards something that causes everyone to realise its gone too far, so why wouldn't it be some completely fanny trying to get into the studio section? There's absolutely someone in your support who thinks that's a good idea.

And you think that’s the reason behind Sutton and Lennon being denied access to Ibrox?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, AJF said:

 

So it’s your belief that Lennon and Sutton sitting inside a studio in Ibrox were likely to come into harms way as opposed to this being a reason for Rangers to play hardball with media/pundits?

Straight from the horses mouth

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Clown Job said:

So you’re saying the board are lying publicly about the reasons?

What? No. I’m saying they’ve likely used “safety concerns” as a very broad term in order to deny access.

There has been no mention that these safety concerns had anything to do with the same expectation that they’d be attacked by fans.

Rangers could’ve fed them any old excuse under the term “safety concerns” such as the studio having dodgy wiring, the roof is about to collapse etc. None of which I believe are genuine and are simply a way of denying access to folk they don’t want inside Ibrox.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

guess that means they've either i) had a specific enough threat (maybe in the post) to panic and deny entry to sutton and lennon, ii) they're being paranoid that some rangers* goblin will start frothing at the mouth and attack one of them so they're being cautious, or iii) they're playing a nice little sash bash on their dog whistle/flute. Take your pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, AJF said:

Rangers could’ve fed them any old excuse under the term “safety concerns” such as the studio having dodgy wiring, the roof is about to collapse etc. None of which I believe are genuine and are simply a way of denying access to folk they don’t want inside Ibrox.

So you are saying they're lying, but you're just unwilling to type the actual words that concisely express what you're thinking.

 

Edited by Aim Here
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, AJF said:

Nobody has said that at all. Sutton cited “security reasons” which could be any number of things. They’ve likely used that as a blanket reason to stop them coming because saying “we just don’t want them there” probably wouldn’t cut it.

Im not saying I agree with it at all, just countering the claims from people that think Rangers genuinely believe they’d get attacked or harmed.

Sorry m9, hope I haven’t portrayed rangers in a negative light. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Dons_1988 said:

Sorry m9, hope I haven’t portrayed rangers in a negative light. 

Haha, they’ll be portrayed in a bad light regardless of what the reasons were, no issues with that.

If folk genuinely thought the reason they’re not these is because Rangers believed fans would attack them then they’d be saying well done for taking measures to get them out of harms way 😜

As it is though, folk are criticising them because they likely believe the exact same as me, that citing “security reasons” is complete bullshit just to avoid letting them in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...