Jump to content

c***s on the road


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Paxo said:

I haven't checked, but I reckon I could get close to 70 in second in my car.

 

3 hours ago, Bairnardo said:

Yeah there are plenty of cars youl get 70 in secind. An M reg maroon 1.6 escort is among them.

 

All depends on the gearing ratio, probably a bit more scope the bigger the engine size but most cars will do 70 in second as long as you dont mind rebuilding your engine and gearbox every other weekend

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Left Back said:

Getting clocked multiple times, if ive read that right, by fixed speed cameras is mightilly impressive. Surely she'd clock other more savvy drivers/people more familiar with the area around her slowing heavily for the cameras and twig? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 16/07/2022 at 17:23, Craig fae the Vale said:

Is it just me or is there an increasing number for folk who refuse to go any faster than 40 in a 60mph zone?

It is not just you. But speed kills. The government said so. 

The drones have fell for it. 41mph = Peter Sutcliffe levels of criminality. 

Dare overtake them. See them shake their fists vigorously. Hear the tooting of the horn. Laugh as you dissappear off into the distance. Then look forward to appearing on the YouTube dash cam nightmares video where the footage will more likely incriminate the doddery old cuntbag filming than the devil incarnate doing the overtaking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 17/07/2022 at 11:32, Empty It said:
On 17/07/2022 at 00:23, supermik said:
Don’t care if I am now considered to be a c**t on the road now. With the current cost of fuel, my cruise control is now set at 56mph on every motorway or dual carriageway that I have to cross. There is a second lane which you are free to pass me on, but if you do, then, I will probably pass you whilst you are refuelling at the next garage.

As others have said the 56mph thing is utter shite, it depends on what car, size of engine, driving conditions and many other factors as to what the most "efficient" speed is.

 

On 17/07/2022 at 12:34, Loonytoons said:


 

 


Irrespective of any of the above. 56mph will be more fuel efficient than 70mph which, I suspect, is what the poster was getting at.

 

 

On 17/07/2022 at 13:24, Bairnardo said:
On 17/07/2022 at 12:34, Loonytoons said:





Irrespective of any of the above. 56mph will be more fuel efficient than 70mph which, I suspect, is what the poster was getting at.

Wouldn't 56 in the wrong gear potentially be less efficient than 70 in the right one, for example? When you also account for the fact that the greater speed is balanced by a lesser time?

 

On 17/07/2022 at 14:06, Bairnardo said:

Point is its not as simple as just saying 56 is more efficient in all circumstances. 

Lower speed doesn't neccersarily mean grater efficiency

 

On 17/07/2022 at 14:19, Newbornbairn said:

The highest gear at the lowest speed would brie the best option. 

Where the engine produces peak torque is the most efficient part of the rev range. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 17/07/2022 at 17:36, red23 said:

Not sure if i posted this one yet but a while ago i saw a driver who was weaving all over the road, had pass plates on the car so thought oh well maybe only just passed test. 

Pulled along side and low and behold she had 2 hands on the wheel while still holding her phone in the palm of her hand, occasionally flipping it over to check the messages occasionally. 

Also driving out a backroad coming round a bend, yet another woman way over the line because she was on her phone (was dark and could see the glow)

To sum it up a number of woman struggle to drive competently as it is, add in using a mobile phone at the same time makes them a danger to everyone.

See people on their phones all the time. I live on the third floor next to a fairly busy road and notice people driving with one hand on their phone texting, usually just below the steering wheel. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 17/07/2022 at 04:19, hk blues said:

It's a bit chicken and egg maybe - if less folk were to drink and drive then maybe there would be more demand for taxis. 

Im not sure, even the towns and citys where you can get taxis or an uber easily the percentage who drink drive is nuts 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, cambozpar said:

Im not sure, even the towns and citys where you can get taxis or an uber easily the percentage who drink drive is nuts 

 

Yep, agreed.  

It's probably where the UK was 30 + years ago with regards to the attitude to drinking and driving.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SuperSaints1877 said:

It also helps to reduce drag. Highly fuel efficient.

 

Save money on windscreen wash by driving really close to coaches and trucks so the spray washes over you. 

 

This also helps to reduce drag. Highly fuel efficient.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Thistle_do_nicely said:

Getting clocked multiple times, if ive read that right, by fixed speed cameras is mightilly impressive. Surely she'd clock other more savvy drivers/people more familiar with the area around her slowing heavily for the cameras and twig? 

 Knowing all these locations well, you'd need to be a blithering idiot to get caught. There are warning signs everywhere. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We travelled south on the A82 yesterday and saw life itself drift away.

As we overtook, the previously dawdling driver closed the gap to the campervan and caused a scenario fraught with risk. On this occasion the only consequence was bewilderment.

A few minutes further south the traffic halted, in the distance there was CPR and a rescue helicopter landing. Expertise and emergency responses were ineffective and the motorcycle rider lost his life.

As we abandoned our journey and turned northwards I dwelled upon the juxtaposition of the two incidents and the very different outcomes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...