Jump to content

The Celtic All Seasons thread


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Monkey Tennis said:

Why were we fortunate to have them here?

I'd have preferred it if neither had played in Scotland.  In what possible way did it benefit anyone in Scotland, other than the clubs they played for?

Ambassadors!  What does that even mean?  Generous with the Ferrero Rocher, were they?

1. Just an opinion, in the same way I felt Dobbie added a bit of class to the Championship in his latter years - sorry to have angered you.

2. Di Stefano signed him for Dundee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Grangemouth Bairn said:

1. Just an opinion, in the same way I felt Dobbie added a bit of class to the Championship in his latter years - sorry to have angered you.

2. Di Stefano signed him for Dundee

For No. I Think youre getting mixed up with the signing of Fablolly Ravioli.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Monkey Tennis said:

Why were we fortunate to have them here?

I'd have preferred it if neither had played in Scotland.  In what possible way did it benefit anyone in Scotland, other than the clubs they played for?

 

I think having highly talented players does benefit the league. For instance Eremenko for Kilmarnock was one that made me watch their highlights with greater attention. Obviously the teams that have them benefit the most but higher profile players will get our league more attention when we struggle to compete with the EPL for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, gannonball said:

I think having highly talented players does benefit the league. For instance Eremenko for Kilmarnock was one that made me watch their highlights with greater attention. Obviously the teams that have them benefit the most but higher profile players will get our league more attention when we struggle to compete with the EPL for that.

To what end?

People who'd watch anyway might put their chair a bit nearer the telly?

 

The benefits are clearly simply incalculable.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said:

To what end?

People who'd watch anyway might put their chair a bit nearer the telly?

 

The benefits are clearly simply incalculable.

Just because the aren’t directly calculable doesn’t mean there are no benefits. Having higher profile players, higher talented players and managers means more exposure. More exposure generally means more cash for sponsorship tv deals etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, gannonball said:

Just because the aren’t directly calculable doesn’t mean there are no benefits. Having higher profile players, higher talented players and managers means more exposure. More exposure generally means more cash for sponsorship tv deals etc.

Oh ffs.

These things are so intangible.  Any real cash advantage would be miniscule.  The reality is that the presence of such players in our country, just makes the clubs they play for, more attractive to people throughout it.  That's the very last thing that would benefit our game.

I'd be behind the idea of generating a bigger overall pot, if it got distributed fairly.   However, it doesn't and it was even worse back then. 

The idea that it benefited our game is just something people say.  When challenged, however, as we're seeing, they struggle.

Having Larsson and Laudrup play in Scotland was great for Celtic and Rangers.  It was actively bad for the Scottish game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said:

Oh ffs.

These things are so intangible.  Any real cash advantage would be miniscule.  The reality is that the presence of such players in our country, just makes the clubs they play for, more attractive to people throughout it.  That's the very last thing that would benefit our game.

I'd be behind the idea of generating a bigger overall pot, if it got distributed fairly.   However, it doesn't and it was even worse back then. 

The idea that it benefited our game is just something people say.  When challenged, however, as we're seeing, they struggle.

Having Larsson and Laudrup play in Scotland was great for Celtic and Rangers.  It was actively bad for the Scottish game.

Starting to think football isn’t the sport for you 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Monkey Tennis said:

Oh ffs.

These things are so intangible.  Any real cash advantage would be miniscule.  The reality is that the presence of such players in our country, just makes the clubs they play for, more attractive to people throughout it.  That's the very last thing that would benefit our game.

I'd be behind the idea of generating a bigger overall pot, if it got distributed fairly.   However, it doesn't and it was even worse back then. 

The idea that it benefited our game is just something people say.  When challenged, however, as we're seeing, they struggle.

Having Larsson and Laudrup play in Scotland was great for Celtic and Rangers.  It was actively bad for the Scottish game.

I’m not saying it was a massive benefit as a whole but there are benefits. And tbh I’m not sure why you are so bothered about it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, gannonball said:

I’m not saying it was a massive benefit as a whole but there are benefits. And tbh I’m not sure why you are so bothered about it. 

Benefits you've not really been able to identify?

I'm bothered because I'm  a Scot who lives in Scotland and likes football.  Sorry if it's confusing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Monkey Tennis said:

Benefits you've not really been able to identify?

I'm bothered because I'm  a Scot who lives in Scotland and likes football.  Sorry if it's confusing.

I literally said them and you wrote it off as miniscule whilst having a bit of a rant over something that is pretty trivial and I can’t be arsed arguing about it tbh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, gannonball said:

I literally said them and you wrote it off as miniscule whilst having a bit of a rant over something that is pretty trivial and I can’t be arsed arguing about it tbh.

What, this bit: "More exposure generally means more cash for sponsorship tv deals etc." ?

Yes, I'd probably give up too, if I were in your shoes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 26/07/2022 at 22:10, gannonball said:

I literally said them and you wrote it off as miniscule whilst having a bit of a rant over something that is pretty trivial and I can’t be arsed arguing about it tbh.

See this is the different perspectives. 

It isn’t trivial to those of us who consume football in this country and don’t follow one of two teams. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...