18May1991 Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 McGregor? Really? I think he’s a cracking player. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gannonball Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 7 hours ago, Snifter Pee Rot said: Making joke bids of 5m means you needn't bother God. I know he’s powerful but calling Lawwell god is an absolute ruddy. Also how on earth is 5 million a joke bid? 24 minutes ago, 18May1991 said: McGregor? Really? I think he’s a cracking player. Agreed. He scores and creates goals,tackles,covers ground and dictates play if you play him further back. I don’t know what else you can really expect from a midfielder, he’s consistent too. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 What are Aberdeen basing their valuation of McKenna on? Average player at best, do not want. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melanius Mullarkey Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 26 minutes ago, Romeo said: What are Aberdeen basing their valuation of McKenna on? Average player at best, do not want. £5m is tantamount to telling Scott McKenna to go home to where he came from. Not surprising from Celtic tbh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheep62 Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, gannonball said: Also how on earth is 5 million a joke bid? Sunday morning bag of fag packet arithmetic Victims value Glass Jaw @ £25m Arsenal offer 60% of that and cue outrage calling it insulting, derisory, a joke etc etc. Aberdeen value McKenna @ £10m and have previously turned down circa £6.5/£7m for him. Victims offer 50% of asking price and they think it isn't a joke. Go figure bhoys. £10m and decent sell on percentage or f**k off (apologies for language on a Sunday) Preferably you chose the second option. Edited June 23, 2019 by Sheep62 -2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 £5m is tantamount to telling Scott McKenna to go home to where he came from. Not surprising from Celtic tbh.Thought so. Aberdeen are at it. We should not be singing a defender from one of the bottom 9 teams. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gannonball Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 (edited) 36 minutes ago, Sheep62 said: Sunday morning bag of fag packet arithmetic Victims value Glass Jaw @ £25m Arsenal offer 60% of that and cue outrage calling it insulting, derisory, a joke etc etc. Aberdeen value McKenna @ £10m and have previously turned down circa £6.5/£7m for him. Victims offer 50% of asking price and they think it isn't a joke. Go figure bhoys. £10m and decent sell on percentage or f**k off (apologies for language on a Sunday) Preferably you chose the second option. I rate McKenna but I dont think anyone truly rates him at 10 million including Aberdeen. His stock is arguably less than what it was a year ago. Tierney has proven to perform well at the highest level (champions league) where McKenna has been questionable at international level against low level opposition. TIerney has played alot more games than McKenna despite being nearly a year younger too.The two really aren't comparable in terms of value. Offering 3 times your previous transfer record for one of your players can't really be seen as a 'joke'. FWIW I think he can be a good defender at a decent level but given Van Dijk went for 12 million he is nowhere near the level he was at when we sold him. Edited June 23, 2019 by gannonball 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Empty It Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 Celtic would be mental not to cash in on Tierney, the money offered is more than enough to get a great player in to cover LB and plenty to strengthen the squad elsewhere ( or line lawwells pockets) 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennett Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 1 hour ago, Romeo said: What are Aberdeen basing their valuation of McKenna on? Average player at best, do not want. Quite right Romeo, Aberdeen's greed is holding him back from his dream move. The SFA must step in here and force Aberdeen to sell the player! -1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sheep62 Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 (edited) 27 minutes ago, gannonball said: I rate McKenna but I dont think anyone truly rates him at 10 million including Aberdeen. His stock is arguably less than what it was a year ago. Tierney has proven to perform well at the highest level (champions league) where McKenna has been questionable at international level against low level opposition. TIerney has played alot more games than McKenna despite being nearly a year younger too.The two really aren't comparable in terms of value. Offering 3 times your previous transfer record for one of your players can't really be seen as a 'joke'. FWIW I think he can be a good defender at a decent level but given Van Dijk went for 12 million he is nowhere near the level he was at when we sold him. I'm not foolish enough to attempt to compare the two in terms of value. However the selling club in both instances hold the aces here, given length of contract the relative players are on. My point is purely in terms of percentages of selling club's valuation and that is where I view Celtic's offer as a joke Edited June 23, 2019 by Sheep62 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Romeo Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 Not sure why Aberdeen don't sell McKenna to real Madrid or Barcelona. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guts Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 What a shocker of transfer window we are having. McKenna is a fucking donkey. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Moomintroll Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 Not sure why Aberdeen don't sell McKenna to real Madrid or Barcelona. a) It is Real Madrid.b) Bore off you insufferable one eyed troll & take wasteofspacewilly with you on the way out. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukDukGoose Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 50 minutes ago, gannonball said: I rate McKenna but I dont think anyone truly rates him at 10 million including Aberdeen. His stock is arguably less than what it was a year ago. Tierney has proven to perform well at the highest level (champions league) where McKenna has been questionable at international level against low level opposition. TIerney has played alot more games than McKenna despite being nearly a year younger too.The two really aren't comparable in terms of value. Offering 3 times your previous transfer record for one of your players can't really be seen as a 'joke'. FWIW I think he can be a good defender at a decent level but given Van Dijk went for 12 million he is nowhere near the level he was at when we sold him. Tierney's stock is arguably less than it was a year ago. Celtic limped out of the champions league at the Diddy stage and he's been injured. McKenna's worth in comparison to our transfer record is not relevant at all. Bizarre statement. Van Dijk was sold years ago. The market has changed. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KTID26 Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 10 hours ago, DavieCFC said: See we're linked with McKenna from Aberdeen again Plz for the love of god no, especially for what they want for him. Don't rate the guy at all A donkey would be embarrassed to be compared to this guy. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloPerth Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 £5m is a more than generous offer for McKenna. If Celtic seriously sell Tierney and McGregor, and are going to be bringing in the standard of Turnbull and McKenna, then we really could have quite an interesting league on our hands next season. Was the Celtic fan who said he wasn't bothered if McGregor left, implying he didn't rate him, actually serious?!! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukDukGoose Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 4 minutes ago, KTID26 said: A donkey would be embarrassed to be compared to this guy. Yet SSC rates him higher than Stuart Findlay 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KTID26 Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 1 minute ago, Merkland Red said: Yet SSC rates him higher than Stuart Findlay After his performances for SSC I would suspect that is not the case. Time alone will tell. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RussellAnderson Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 “McKenna’s not good enough!!”“Why won’t Aberdeen sell us McKenna?!!”Fuckin make up yer mind min. 5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DukDukGoose Posted June 23, 2019 Share Posted June 23, 2019 1 minute ago, KTID26 said: After his performances for SSC I would suspect that is not the case. Time alone will tell. Just accept you're wrong and move on. Makes it easier for everyone else. There's a reason McKenna had had bids from the teams that have come in for him. He's nowhere near the finished article and never will be at Aberdeen. He's also far away from shite. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.