Jump to content

Junior football, what is the future?


Burnie_man

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, GNU_Linux said:

None of those clubs have juniors as part of their name. The only clubs who use junior in their name are Cumnock, Beith, Neilston, Gartcairn, Wishaw & Greenock.

 

Of the ex-juniors out east Camelon & Tranent kept it as part of their name with Glenrothes choosing to drop it.

Darvel & Muirkirk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we’re talking about ‘years of uncertainty’ if something similar happens to EoS(tier 6 conferences one year, premier division + tier 7 conferences and then settling down to a more permanent structure) then you just need to look at what happens to the current structure, that won’t be stable for years yet either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, GNU_Linux said:

 

 

 

 

 

None of those clubs have juniors as part of their name. The only clubs who use junior in their name are Cumnock, Beith, Neilston, Gartcairn, Wishaw & Greenock.

 

Of the ex-juniors out east Camelon & Tranent kept it as part of their name with Glenrothes choosing to drop it.

 

 

Sauchie kept it aswell 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes "geographical identity" is the LL's mantra for the West, and has already been adhered to in the East.
However the Luncarty/Tayport situation may challenge the boundary principle/rule ?
******
As an aside,  Brechin may not finish the season as Club 42.  The current situation is :
Albion Rovers   26 - 24   (10 games to play,including Cove once, & Edinburgh City twice)
Brechin City       27 - 17  (9 games to play, but 'easier' fixtures 'on paper')


No chance Brechin will overtake Albion they’ve got 17 points from 27 games, I’d be amazed if they can even catch Albions current points total of 24 as on current points per game they’ll only get 23 and even then they’d need Albion to lose every game. Brechin are a beaten team and they’re going to the playoff. They need to hope Brora/Kelty/Bonnyrigg don’t turn up or they’re heading out the leagues.

Saw it mentioned earlier about the West Lothian teams possibly finding the EOSFL is full in the future, that must never happen any club wanting to join meeting the criteria should be accepted. There must be no closed shops and once we have a WOSFL the bottle necks for promotion to the LL and SPFL need to be looked at. Any pyramid should be free flowing with the only hurdles to promotion being minimum ground standards i.e floodlights at Tier 5. Once WOSFL is up and running hopefully the HL/NCL/NRJFA and Tayside clubs can sort something out.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, GNU_Linux said:

 

 

 

 

 

None of those clubs have juniors as part of their name. The only clubs who use junior in their name are Cumnock, Beith, Neilston, Gartcairn, Wishaw & Greenock.

 

Of the ex-juniors out east Camelon & Tranent kept it as part of their name with Glenrothes choosing to drop it.

 

 

Port Glasgow, Lesmahagow, Muirkirk, Maybole, Darvel as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It will be really interesting to hear what Mr Ronney has to say and how much of it will be bluster, it is my one sincere hope that the delegates who go tonight put him through the wringer and see through any smoke screen or even veiled threats that he may come up with.I for one hope that the WOSL becomes a reality as there has been no progress on or off the park, seems to many of the blazers are in it for themselves. A thought any of the teams who do move over will they drop the juniors tag and become,  eg Pollock FC, Kilbirnie FC, Auchinleck FC, etc.  


No need to drop the Junior name from any club it just reflects their history, Hamilton still carry the name “Academical”
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, gogsy said:

Wishaw Juniors committee member Alex Young said the club had “declared an interest” in both meetings and were still leaving their options open.

He notes that the club have “put their faith” in club secretary Robert Watson to make the decision for the League One strugglers.

Doesn't matter which way he votes surely "putting their faith" in one man is a crazy way to run a club.

Then again its the Daily Record:unsure2:

Doesn't the Wishaw secretary post on here?

Robert is one of the games good guys, and good people are involved with Wishaw, I doubt they'll just blindly follow either option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The1andonly said:

A thought any of the teams who do move over will they drop the juniors tag and become,  eg Pollock FC, Kilbirnie FC, Auchinleck FC, etc.  

 

1 hour ago, GNU_Linux said:

None of those clubs have juniors as part of their name. The only clubs who use junior in their name are Cumnock, Beith, Neilston, Gartcairn, Wishaw & Greenock.

Of the ex-juniors out east Camelon & Tranent kept it as part of their name with Glenrothes choosing to drop it.

Indeed so.

Pollok (no "c", please note) have only ever been just "Pollok FC" despite numerous attempts by ignorant journos etc to re-christen them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reading Record articles is like reading the outpourings of Talbot fans here. Gosh, what a coincidence. "Uncertainty" = I'm too thick to understand anything that isn't exactly as it has always been, apparently.

 

"Always" meaning "since 2002", of course.

Edited by Bad Wolf
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Ginaro said:

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/local-sport/lanarkshire-junior-football-chiefs-fear-21665812

The usual every sentence is a  paragraph from the Record. A weird mention of tier 7, apparently years of uncertainty with WOS conferences despite the fact that the WRJFA don't seem to have a plan to integrate the non-Juniors, and an absurd mention of the SPFL for a club like Bellshill.

And of course if you don't want to be one of the 18 left behind, then simply move over to the WOS...

It's not that bad an article.

It mentions clubs from lower down the Junior west pecking order which are considering their futures. A number of them hadn't been flagged up here on P&B previously.

In any case they have to consider the future before making any move.

It also picks up the point about the SFA not being in a position to block a WoS set up by the Lowland League, even if it desired to do so.

There's also club reps stating that, in effect,  they see the west Juniors as having an uncertain future. Obviously only time will tell.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Marten said:

Unsurprisingly, Mr. Ronney can't back up any of his claims that the SFA can somehow force the WRJFA in the pyramid with an AGM vote...

 

Most clubs will have picked up on this!

edit: Every time Mr Ronney goes onto the media with such comments it under-mines what he seems to be trying to do. Sometimes I wonder if he really does support the efforts of the "enemy"  after all?

Edited by Dev
add
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, San Starko Rover said:

 


No chance Brechin will overtake Albion they’ve got 17 points from 27 games, I’d be amazed if they can even catch Albions current points total of 24 as on current points per game they’ll only get 23 and even then they’d need Albion to lose every game. Brechin are a beaten team and they’re going to the playoff. They need to hope Brora/Kelty/Bonnyrigg don’t turn up or they’re heading out the leagues.

Saw it mentioned earlier about the West Lothian teams possibly finding the EOSFL is full in the future, that must never happen any club wanting to join meeting the criteria should be accepted. There must be no closed shops and once we have a WOSFL the bottle necks for promotion to the LL and SPFL need to be looked at. Any pyramid should be free flowing with the only hurdles to promotion being minimum ground standards i.e floodlights at Tier 5. Once WOSFL is up and running hopefully the HL/NCL/NRJFA and Tayside clubs can sort something out.

 

Agreed but there may be some total numbers of teams which might be awkward to fit in without wholesale restructuring below the Premier Division, which is what I was getting at. How would teams respond to that in order let in late-comers?

I previously suggested the current two East Region south divisions coming in as parallel to divisions one and two next season as a way to integrate them at about the most appropriate level - but could that still happen with conferences now planned? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dev said:

Agreed but there may be some total numbers of teams which might be awkward to fit in without wholesale restructuring below the Premier Division, which is what I was getting at. How would teams respond to that in order let in late-comers?

I previously suggested the current two East Region south divisions coming in as parallel to divisions one and two next season as a way to integrate them at about the most appropriate level - but could that still happen with conferences now planned? 

 

Yea they'd defiantly need to keep on looking at how the bottom is structured be it single tier, more local parallel tiers or conferences.  The EOS seem to be good at this and ultimately let their members make the final decision which is the best way.  I know a few on here are against the conferences at tier 7 again next season but ultimately accept that it's what the members voted for.  hopefully there won't be many more years of large influx of clubs so major changes won't be required.  Tier 8 or 9 might want to look at a geographical split to reduce travel for the smaller clubs.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, LongTimeLurker said:

The EoS have not been accepting applications from north of the Tay Bridge boundary, so Lochee are probably in limbo in pyramid terms at the moment given Tayside clubs have not been part of the recent north pyramid negotiations. 

It was previously mentioned on here that EoS had knocked back a Tayside club.

For clarity, some Tayside clubs have applied and been refused on geographical grounds ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, San Starko Rover said:

Yea they'd defiantly need to keep on looking at how the bottom is structured be it single tier, more local parallel tiers or conferences.  The EOS seem to be good at this and ultimately let their members make the final decision which is the best way.  I know a few on here are against the conferences at tier 7 again next season but ultimately accept that it's what the members voted for.  hopefully there won't be many more years of large influx of clubs so major changes won't be required.  Tier 8 or 9 might want to look at a geographical split to reduce travel for the smaller clubs.  

Yes. The lowest division could do with a regional split if there are enough teams for this to happen. It would make it easier for new teams to make the transition to the pyramid. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Robert James said:

Yes "geographical identity" is the LL's mantra for the West, and has already been adhered to in the East.

However the Luncarty/Tayport situation may challenge the boundary principle/rule ?

******

As an aside,  Brechin may not finish the season as Club 42.  The current situation is :

Albion Rovers   26 - 24   (10 games to play,including Cove once, & Edinburgh City twice)

Brechin City       27 - 17  (9 games to play, but 'easier' fixtures 'on paper')

Did you put a bet on Brechin  avoiding the drop ? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...