Zing. Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 We lost Griffiths and Doyle and brought in Vine and Collins 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dudu Dahan pal Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 (edited) Looking at Lennon's signings at celtic. Good signings: Mulgrew (free) Ledley (free) Hooper (2.4 million) Kayal (1.2 million) Izaguirre (600k) Forster (loan then 2 million) Stokes (1.2 million) Commons (300k) Matthews (free) Wanyama (900k) Lustig (free) Rogic (free) Van Dijk (2.6 million) Bitton (700k) Johansen (2 million) Griffiths (1 million) poor signings: Cha Du Ri (free) Murphy (800k) Juarez (3 million ) Kapo (free) Ljungberg (free) Bangura (2.2 million) El Kaddouri (loan) Blackman (free) Ibrahim (loan) Brozek (loan) Miku (loan) Kamenar (loan) Lassad (free) Gershon (loan) Noring (loan) Balde (1.8 million) Moulyokolo (free) Boerrigter (1 million) Pukki (2.4 million) Oberschmidt (loan) Watt (100k) meh signings: Majstorovic (free) Wilson (free) Ambrose (1.5 million) Edited June 25, 2017 by Hibeesbounce75 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gannonball Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 Watt a poor signing? Scores against Barca then we sell him for 15 times what we paid for him? Ps theres a few others like back up keepers on loan you wouldnt even classify. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Grass Is Greener. Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 I'm not sure Lennon was making the signings at Celtic tbh. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
djchapsticks Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 1 hour ago, Hibeesbounce75 said: Will be seriously worried if McGinn goes. You're losing the energy in your midfield. It would also leave us with Bartley, McGeouch and Martin as our only central midfielders. I'd be asking for at least 3 million. and even then I wouldn't trust lennon to spend it if he ever even sees the money from that and the Cummings deal. £3m in real terms would be £2m to Hibs, I'd imagine the 33% sell on would have a massive impact on what your board would reasonably see him depart for. Either way, I'd happily see you take £3m for McGinn, we've never got close to a seven figure transfer fee since we sold Ian Ferguson to original Rangers so a million quid would be a massive boost for us. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zing. Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 Saw elsewhere that Rod Petrie had previously said at a Hibs AGM the 33% sell on for St Mirren was a load of pish and well wide of the mark. So we've got the word of the St Mirren chairman against Rod. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dudu Dahan pal Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 yeah apparently its closer to 20% 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billyg Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 18 minutes ago, Zing. said: Saw elsewhere that Rod Petrie had previously said at a Hibs AGM the 33% sell on for St Mirren was a load of pish and well wide of the mark. So we've got the word of the St Mirren chairman against Rod. Who are you more likely to believe ? The club who's having to pay it , or the club that's due to receive it. If Gilmour says it's 33% , and he negotiated it , then it's 33% ! It was the only reason that the deal went through in the first place ! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zing. Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 (edited) 6 minutes ago, billyg said: Who are you more likely to believe ? The club who's having to pay it , or the club that's due to receive it. If Gilmour says it's 33% , and he negotiated it , then it's 33% ! It was the only reason that the deal went through in the first place ! Aye, cool story. Gilmour says it's 33% to appease the fans who are disgruntled that they've just lost their prize asset for next to nothing. It can work both ways. Rod Petrie/Leeann Dempster negotiated the deal, they say it's not 33%, then it's not 33%. Edited June 25, 2017 by Zing. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bambino7 Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 59 minutes ago, Hibeesbounce75 said: Looking at Lennon's signings at celtic. Good signings: Mulgrew (free) Ledley (free) Hooper (2.4 million) Kayal (1.2 million) Izaguirre (600k) Forster (loan then 2 million) Stokes (1.2 million) Commons (300k) Matthews (free) Wanyama (900k) Lustig (free) Rogic (free) Van Dijk (2.6 million) Bitton (700k) Johansen (2 million) Griffiths (1 million) poor signings: Cha Du Ri (free) Murphy (800k) Juarez (3 million ) Kapo (free) Ljungberg (free) Bangura (2.2 million) El Kaddouri (loan) Blackman (free) Ibrahim (loan) Brozek (loan) Miku (loan) Kamenar (loan) Lassad (free) Gershon (loan) Noring (loan) Balde (1.8 million) Moulyokolo (free) Boerrigter (1 million) Pukki (2.4 million) Oberschmidt (loan) Watt (100k) meh signings: Majstorovic (free) Wilson (free) Ambrose (1.5 million) John Park signings mair like. Bolton and us last year would be a better comparison. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddie Holly Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 2 minutes ago, billyg said: Who are you more likely to believe ? The club who's having to pay it , or the club that's due to receive it. If Gilmour says it's 33% , and he negotiated it , then it's 33% ! It was the only reason that the deal went through in the first place ! i read somewhere that mcginn is due 10% of any transfer fee as well as saints 33%.hibs will need to work hard if they're to get much out of it. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bambino7 Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 3 minutes ago, Zing. said: Aye, cool story. Gilmour says it's 33% to appease the fans who are disgruntled that they've just lost their prize asset for next to nothing. It can work both ways. Rod Petrie/Leean Dempster negotiated the deal, they say it's not 33%, then it's not 33%. Correct. 15%tops. He signs a new deal they will get zip. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bambino7 Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 1 minute ago, Buddie Holly said: i read somewhere that mcginn is due 10% of any transfer fee as well as saints 33%.hibs will need to work hard if they're to get much out of it. Probably a Jambo website. McGinn owes the percentage to himself apparently. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zing. Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 So we are to believe we are giving away 43% of any fee for McGinn? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buddie Holly Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 3 minutes ago, Zing. said: Aye, cool story. Gilmour says it's 33% to appease the fans who are disgruntled that they've just lost their prize asset for next to nothing. It can work both ways. Rod Petrie/Leean Dempster negotiated the deal, they say it's not 33%, then it's not 33%. saints fans were hardly "disgruntled".we knew well in advance john would be leaving and we would do ok out of a development fee.to get hibs to include a 33% sell on was genius.sounds like it's the hibs fans who are "disgruntled" 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billyg Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 6 minutes ago, Zing. said: Aye, cool story. Gilmour says it's 33% to appease the fans who are disgruntled that they've just lost their prize asset for next to nothing. It can work both ways. Rod Petrie/Leean Dempster negotiated the deal, they say it's not 33%, then it's not 33%. Nope ! Someone passed comment on twitter last year , well after McGinn had departed, asking if anyone knew the actual % agreed. Gilmour wasn't even part of the conversation so had no need to contribute , but he did , and stated it was 33% ! Who am I most likely to believe ? Gilmour who made sure the club didn't fall into the wrong hands , or Petrie , who would sell his granny down the river ? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St. Jude Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 i read somewhere that mcginn is due 10% of any transfer fee as well as saints 33%.hibs will need to work hard if they're to get much out of it. So add an agent fee of roughly 10% on to this and Hibs will get 47% of the transfer fee? Not a chance Petrie negotiated that. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billyg Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 2 minutes ago, Zing. said: So we are to believe we are giving away 43% of any fee for McGinn? Why are you bothering about it now anyway , it's been out there for years. Petrie's just covering his arse now 'cos of the grief he'll get from the nuggets. Like you 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billyg Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 2 minutes ago, St. Jude said: So add an agent fee of roughly 10% on to this and Hibs will get 47% of the transfer fee? Not a chance Petrie negotiated that. You'll need to take that up with Petrie. Gilmour just said that he wishes Hibs would hurry up and sell because "a third of McGinn is ours" ! Gilmour has truly played a blinder here ! 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St. Jude Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 Just now, billyg said: You'll need to take that up with Petrie. Gilmour just said that he wishes Hibs would hurry up and sell because "a third of McGinn is ours" ! Gilmour has truly played a blinder here ! He's certainly played a blinder pulling the wool over your eyes. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.