Jump to content

Recommended Posts



Don’t think it’s Jack Brown, he’s a fair bit shorter than the mystery number 6

That’s what I recall as well. Whoever that is, he looks over six foot and Jack Brown looked fairly small when he came against Falkirk.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

eeerrmmm....I'm hearing Keatings appeal for the "dive" has been rejected?! 

Imagine that was James Forest or something, just imagine. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
eeerrmmm....I'm hearing Keatings appeal for the "dive" has been rejected?! 

Imagine that was James Forest or something, just imagine. 


I’ve very little idea of how this appeals process works. It’s quite clearly not a dive. He should have been cleared. I’ve also seen clear reds downgraded. That was Scott Brown.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Stoo61 said:

eeerrmmm....I'm hearing Keatings appeal for the "dive" has been rejected?! 

Imagine that was James Forest or something, just imagine. 

The game is fcucked  .The  folk who make these decisions at source and after ,  are not fit for purpose .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, Stoo61 said:

eeerrmmm....I'm hearing Keatings appeal for the "dive" has been rejected?! 

Imagine that was James Forest or something, just imagine. 

That's a fucking disgraceful decision. 

Thel second yellow was bad enough, but to not overturn he original error is appalling.

Never a dive in a million years....

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

ICT website hacked.

IMG_3476.jpg

That’s what you get if you go to their website.

Just waiting on them to post some porn again now.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Anyone able to post up the actual statement because I get what the guy above posted as well?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Wilson Robertson said:

IMG_1300.jpg

A statement that I can thoroughly appreciate and get behind, very well said ICT.

Wait till the beaks and blazers at Hampden take a huff and fury over this like a 2 year old toddler.

SFA Statement - Any club that in future dares release a statement criticising the SFA and disciplinary system in particular will be subject to the following without right of appeal 

1) Very heavy fine.

2) Very heavy points deduction. 

3) Stand closures 

Signed by the most dishonest and corrupt 

Stuart Regan

Edited by CaspianChris

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Our statements used to be the kind that had to be read between your fingers but that one released last night is really excellent (apart from some reference about dogs in the street).

An absolutely disgraceful decision. I don't think anything else needs to be said really.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Our statements used to be the kind that had to be read between your fingers but that one released last night is really excellent (apart from some reference about dogs in the street).

An absolutely disgraceful decision. I don't think anything else needs to be said really.


Not Jim Traynor found.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Burrows (Motherwell) and Dempster (Hibs) have both made twitter statements today backing up the ICT view 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...