SandyCromarty Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 14 hours ago, Highland Capital said: Number 6 was also McCart's number. Wouldn't be at all surprised if we've signed him and not announced it. Is it Jack Brown who is out on loan to Rothes, long shot I know. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Central Belt Caley Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 Is it Jack Brown who is out on loan to Rothes, long shot I know.Don’t think it’s Jack Brown, he’s a fair bit shorter than the mystery number 6 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Highland Capital Posted February 17, 2020 Share Posted February 17, 2020 Don’t think it’s Jack Brown, he’s a fair bit shorter than the mystery number 6That’s what I recall as well. Whoever that is, he looks over six foot and Jack Brown looked fairly small when he came against Falkirk. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennis_WYNESS Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dennis_WYNESS Posted February 18, 2020 Share Posted February 18, 2020 Looks like Ryan 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stoo61 Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 eeerrmmm....I'm hearing Keatings appeal for the "dive" has been rejected?! Imagine that was James Forest or something, just imagine. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 eeerrmmm....I'm hearing Keatings appeal for the "dive" has been rejected?! Imagine that was James Forest or something, just imagine. I’ve very little idea of how this appeals process works. It’s quite clearly not a dive. He should have been cleared. I’ve also seen clear reds downgraded. That was Scott Brown. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
weeredbook Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 30 minutes ago, Stoo61 said: eeerrmmm....I'm hearing Keatings appeal for the "dive" has been rejected?! Imagine that was James Forest or something, just imagine. The game is fcucked .The folk who make these decisions at source and after , are not fit for purpose . 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MacArab Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 47 minutes ago, Stoo61 said: eeerrmmm....I'm hearing Keatings appeal for the "dive" has been rejected?! Imagine that was James Forest or something, just imagine. That's a fucking disgraceful decision. Thel second yellow was bad enough, but to not overturn he original error is appalling. Never a dive in a million years.... 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
St Innes Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 Disgraceful decision by the panel. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gkneil Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 ICT website hacked.That’s what you get if you go to their website.Just waiting on them to post some porn again now. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ludo*1 Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 Anyone able to post up the actual statement because I get what the guy above posted as well? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Robertson Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Robertson Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Robertson Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Newbornbairn Posted February 19, 2020 Share Posted February 19, 2020 Ridiculous decision - is there any further option for appeal? 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CaspianChris Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 (edited) 1 hour ago, Wilson Robertson said: A statement that I can thoroughly appreciate and get behind, very well said ICT. Wait till the beaks and blazers at Hampden take a huff and fury over this like a 2 year old toddler. SFA Statement - Any club that in future dares release a statement criticising the SFA and disciplinary system in particular will be subject to the following without right of appeal 1) Very heavy fine. 2) Very heavy points deduction. 3) Stand closures Signed by the most dishonest and corrupt Stuart Regan Edited February 20, 2020 by CaspianChris 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RiG Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 Our statements used to be the kind that had to be read between your fingers but that one released last night is really excellent (apart from some reference about dogs in the street). An absolutely disgraceful decision. I don't think anything else needs to be said really. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Savage Henry Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 Our statements used to be the kind that had to be read between your fingers but that one released last night is really excellent (apart from some reference about dogs in the street). An absolutely disgraceful decision. I don't think anything else needs to be said really.Not Jim Traynor found. 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Green Day Posted February 20, 2020 Share Posted February 20, 2020 Burrows (Motherwell) and Dempster (Hibs) have both made twitter statements today backing up the ICT view 0 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.