glassnahalf Posted October 23, 2017 Share Posted October 23, 2017 On 22/10/2017 at 10:50, RiG said: The vast majority of those articles will have appeared in the printed editions as well. Things like letter drops, whilst a good idea on paper, would become prohibitively expensive given the number of consultations which take place every year. Unless you have been living under a rock *chuckle* for the last year and a bit there is no way you couldn't have known about this topic. Agree with you about the expense of flyers, and anyway I suppose 99% of them would be in the bin unread. What about a full page ad in a couple of the most read newspapers? That wouldn't be cost prohibitive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkoRaj Posted October 23, 2017 Share Posted October 23, 2017 This is the most embarrassing, pathetic troll I've ever seen. What an absolute loser.Stop replying to him for feck sake Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
doulikefish Posted October 24, 2017 Share Posted October 24, 2017 Banned the vote is 91 to 28 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bob the tank Posted October 24, 2017 Share Posted October 24, 2017 If you think mcspreader is trolling what about these arseholes who tweeted this earlier on tonight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mjw Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 It was SLab pressure that put rangers out the cup on Sunday as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crossbill Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 Another victory for Monica Lennon! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparky88 Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 Importing fracked fuel provides no economic or environmental benefit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeeTillEhDeh Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 "We" got the M25 so swings and roundabouts... ... [emoji20] Circles in Dundee, not roundabouts . . . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 1 hour ago, sparky88 said: Importing fracked fuel provides no economic or environmental benefit. Cheers up the Nimby's though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Afro Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 Quite encouraging to see the SNP, Greens, Labour and the Lib Dems broadly agree here and vote against the Tories. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sparky88 Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 1 hour ago, Bairnardo said: Do we import fracked fuel? First I have ever heard of this Shale gas ifrom the US is processed at grangemouth Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Crossbill Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 Genuine question - If the Scottish government wanted to ban the import of fracked gas as a chemical feedstock for a private company would it be possible? They can't just ban the import of gas, so it would have to be based on the method of recovery. Is there any precedence for banning chemicals not based on the chemical substance itself, but how it it has been produced. Even if this was possible, is the ability to restrict imports a power that has been devolved to Holyrood? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DublinMagyar Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 Genuine question - If the Scottish government wanted to ban the import of fracked gas as a chemical feedstock for a private company would it be possible? They can't just ban the import of gas, so it would have to be based on the method of recovery. Is there any precedence for banning chemicals not based on the chemical substance itself, but how it it has been produced. Even if this was possible, is the ability to restrict imports a power that has been devolved to Holyrood? If the SG banned such products and England didn't.......what's the fucking point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glassnahalf Posted October 25, 2017 Share Posted October 25, 2017 Isn't it about protecting our own environment? We should protect ourselves and if other countries want to ruin theirs for a profit, then let 'em! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
welshbairn Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 4 hours ago, glassnahalf said: Isn't it about protecting our own environment? We should protect ourselves and if other countries want to ruin theirs for a profit, then let 'em! We live on a planet McFuckwit. The atmosphere doesn't stop at the Channel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 13 hours ago, Crossbill said: Genuine question - If the Scottish government wanted to ban the import of fracked gas as a chemical feedstock for a private company would it be possible? They can't just ban the import of gas, so it would have to be based on the method of recovery. Is there any precedence for banning chemicals not based on the chemical substance itself, but how it it has been produced. Even if this was possible, is the ability to restrict imports a power that has been devolved to Holyrood? No. Fracking in Scotland is "banned" on the grounds of health and safety, the SG has no powers to stop the import of anything on any grounds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glassnahalf Posted October 26, 2017 Share Posted October 26, 2017 7 hours ago, welshbairn said: We live on a planet McFuckwit. The atmosphere doesn't stop at the Channel. I don't think fracking interferes with the atmosphere, isn't it a geological issue? And what part of agreeing with the majority on this subject don't you get? Bellend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baxter Parp Posted October 27, 2017 Share Posted October 27, 2017 Of note. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SandyCromarty Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 There's been fracking offshore since the early eighties and I remember explosives being used. I have no thoughts of fracking for or against. And from an environmental view I have no experience of UK onshore drilling rigs and how well maintained they are environmentally, the same can't be said for some middle eastern land rigs I surveyed which are a environmental feckin disaster, raw sewage from the camp flowing openly in a trench to a pit for instance, one I did had watermelons growing out of the trench. I surveyed a land rig south of Milan for a customer some years back just outside of a small town, and if it hadn't been for the derrick it would have been difficult to find as it it blended in with the surrounding countryside. The Italian land drilling laws were so environmentally strict that the inside rig perimeter was absolutely spotless, by law the crew could not even take snacks etc into the rig area in case it attracted vermin, meals were had at the local town, so if UK land rigs were controlled environmentally who knows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glassnahalf Posted October 28, 2017 Share Posted October 28, 2017 11 hours ago, SandyCromarty said: There's been fracking offshore since the early eighties and I remember explosives being used. I have no thoughts of fracking for or against. And from an environmental view I have no experience of UK onshore drilling rigs and how well maintained they are environmentally, the same can't be said for some middle eastern land rigs I surveyed which are a environmental feckin disaster, raw sewage from the camp flowing openly in a trench to a pit for instance, one I did had watermelons growing out of the trench. I surveyed a land rig south of Milan for a customer some years back just outside of a small town, and if it hadn't been for the derrick it would have been difficult to find as it it blended in with the surrounding countryside. The Italian land drilling laws were so environmentally strict that the inside rig perimeter was absolutely spotless, by law the crew could not even take snacks etc into the rig area in case it attracted vermin, meals were had at the local town, so if UK land rigs were controlled environmentally who knows. No replies after 11 hours? you should have used my name! Guaranteed response! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.